Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T16:16:28.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the specificity of pheromone-baited traps for Cydia funebrana (Treitschke) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. V. Alford
D. V. Alford
Affiliation:
Entomology Department, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Brooklands Avenue, Cambridge CB2 2DR, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sticky traps baited with (Funemone cis-8-dodecenyl acetate or (Codlemone trans-8,trans-10 dodecadien-1-ol) were operated in plum orchards in Cambridgeshire, England, from 1974 to 1976. In addition to large numbers of the target species Cydia funebrana (Treitschke), males of 24 other tortricids were captured. These included species of Cnephasia, Celypha, Epiblema, Pammene and Cydia. As an aid to the correct identification and interpretation of trap catches, details are given of the more important species attracted by the pheromone baits.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , April 1978 , pp. 97 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, D. V. (1976). Pammene suspectana (Zeller) (Lep., Tortricidae), a moth new to Britain.—Entoinologists' Gaz. 27, 148.Google Scholar
Arn, H., Schwarz, C., Limacher, H. & Mani, E. (1974). Sex attractant inhibitors of the codling moth Laspeyresia pomonella L.—Experientia 30, 1142–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baggiolini, M., Charmillot, P.-J., Flaux, G. & Delley, B. (1974). Possibilités pratiques d'emploi des attractifs sexuels synthétiques dans les vergers.—Rev. suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic. 6, 57–61.Google Scholar
Chambon, J. P. & d'Aguilar, J. (1974). Remarques sur Ia spécificitéde quelques phéromones sexuelles de synthése: analyse faunistique des Tortricides en vergers.—Ann. Zool.-Écol. anim. 6, 423–430.Google Scholar
Comeau, A. & Roelofs, W. L. (1973). Sex attraction specificity in the Tortricidae.—Ent. exp. appl. 16, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delley, B., Baggiolini, M., Charmillot, P. J. & Arn, H. (1975). Contribution à I'étude du piégeage de Grapholitha funebrana Tr. (Lep. Tortr.), le carpocapse des prunes, part attractif sexuel synthétique.—Mitt. schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 48, 121–131.Google Scholar
Granges, J. & Baggiolini, M. (1971). Une phéromone sexuelle synthétique attractive pour le carpocapse des prunes (Grapholitha funebrana Tr. [Lép. Tortricidae]).—Rev. suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic. 3, 93–94.Google Scholar
Krämer, K. (1967). Zur angewandten Entomologie im Warndienst.—Z. PflKrankh. PflPath. PflSchutz 74, 627–634.Google Scholar
Neuffer, G. (1973). Pheromonfallen im Warndienst.—Mitt. biol. BundAnst. Ld.-u. Forstw. 151, 311–312.Google Scholar
Touzeau, J. (1975). Les phéromones sexuelles des insectes. Perspectives de leur utilisation pratique en arboriculture et en viticulture.—Phytoma 27 (264), 16–18.Google Scholar
Vernon, J. D. R. (1971). Observations on the biology and control of the plum fruit moth.—Pl. Path. 20, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar