Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:54:51.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orientation by gravid Australian sheep blowflies, Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae), to fleece and synthetic chemical attractants in laboratory bioassays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

C.H. Eisemann
C.H. Eisemann*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
*
C.H. Eisemann, Division of Tropical Animal Production, CSIRO, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gravid females of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedeman) in a laboratory cage orientated positively to samples of fleece. Newly-wetted fleece was significantly more attractive than dry fleece, an effect resulting from the action of water on the fleece and not just addition of water vapour to the volatile fleece kairomones. Fleece contaminated with serous exudate, resulting from myiasis by L. cuprina, was much more attractive than wet, uncontaminated fleece from the same sheep. Kairomones from wetted fleece consistently augmented the attractive effects of 2-mercaptoethanol and indole in separate experiments, and of hydrogen sulphide (released from saturated aqueous sodium sulphide solution) in one trial out of three, but not overall. It is suggested that volatile fleece kairomones play a part in eliciting orientation to sheep by gravid L. cuprina. Fleece kairomones may augment the efficacy of kairomones released by putrefactive conditions in the fleece, which are known to predispose sheep to fly strike. They may also provide an input which helps to retain L. cuprina populations in the sheep’s peridomestic precinct.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 85 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 473 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton Browne, L. & Rogoff, W.M. (1959) The “sheep factor” and oviposition in Lucilia cuprina. Australian Journal of Science 21, 189–190.Google Scholar
Cragg, J.B. (1950) The reactions of Lucilia sericata (Mg.) to various substances placed on sheep. Parasitology 40, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cragg, J.B. (1956) The olfactory behaviour of Lucilia species (Diptera) under natural conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 44, 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, J.B. & Cole, P. (1956) Laboratory studies on the chemosensory reactions of blowflies. Annals of Applied Biology 44, 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, J.B. & Ramage, G.R. (1945) Chemotropic studies on the blowflies Lucilia sericata (Mg.) and Lucilia caesar (L.). Parasitology 36, 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisemann, C.H. (1985) A study of aspects of the host-finding behaviour of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) and of the structure, distribution and behavioural significance of its antennal and palpal sensilla. PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Eisemann, C.H. (1988) Upwind flight by gravid Australian sheep blowflies, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in response to stimuli from sheep. Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisemann, C.H. & Rice, M.J. (1987) The origin of sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), attractants in media infested with larvae. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmens, R.L. & Murray, M.D. (1982) The role of bacterial odours in oviposition by Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), the Australian sheep blowfly. Bulletin of Entomological Research 72, 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmens, R.L. & Murray, M.D. (1983) Bacterial odours as oviposition stimulants for Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), the Australian sheep blowfly. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73, 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, R.P. (1935) Sheep blowfly investigations. II. Substances which induce Lucilia sericata Mg. to oviposit on sheep. Annals of Applied Biology 22, 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, R.P. (1936) Sheep blowfly investigations. III. Observations on the chemotropism of Lucilia sericata Mg. Annals of Applied Biology 23, 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackerras, I.M. & Mackerras, M.J. (1944) Sheep blowfly investigations: the attractiveness of sheep for Lucilia cuprina. Bulletin of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia 181, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Merritt, G.C. & Watts, J.E. (1978a) An in vitro technique for studying fleece-rot and fly strike in sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 54, 513–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, G.C. & Watts, J.E. (1978b) The changes in protein concentration and bacteria of fleece and skin during the development of fleece-rot and body strike in sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 54, 517–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulcock, A.P. & Fraser, I.E.B. (1958) Total counts of microorganisms in the fleece of two Corriedale fleece types. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 704–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M.J. (1986a) Semiochemicals and sensory manipulation strategies for behavioural management of Heliothis species. pp. 27–45in Twine, P.H. & Zalucki, M.P. (Eds) Proceedings of the Heliothis Ecology Workshop 1985. Brisbane, Queensland Department of Primary Industries.Google Scholar
Rice, M.J. (1986b) Peridomesticity (a behavioural characteristic of Lucilia blowflies) and primary sheep strike. News Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Queensland 14, 29–36.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. & Torrie, J.H. (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics-a biometrical approach. 2nd edn. 633 pp. New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R.J. & Seddon, H.R. (Eds) (1933) The sheep blowfly problem in Australia. Report no. 1 of the Joint Blowfly Committee. Pamphlet of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia 37, 136 pp.Google Scholar
Watts, J.E., Merritt, G.C. & Goodrich, B.S. (1981) The ovipositional response of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina to fleece rot odours. Australian Veterinary Journal 57, 450–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodburn, T.L. & Vogt, W.G. (1982) Attractiveness of Merino sheep before and after death to adults of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 21, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar