Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T22:19:29.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The population ecology of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the Lambwe Valley, Kenya. I. Feeding behaviour and activity patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. A. Turner
D. A. Turner
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigations into feeding behaviour and activity patterns, basically by biconical trap sampling, were carried out as part of a study of the population ecology and dynamics of Glossina pallidipes Austen in the Lambwe Valley, Kenya. Host-preference determinations from blood-meal analyses showed that over 80% of feeds constantly derived from bushbuck, buffalo and bushpig, in roughly equal proportions. Activity cycles in relation to feeding and pregnancy, investigated by mark-release-recapture and physiological methods, indicated four-day feeding intervals for males and three-day ones for females. The periodicity was more variable in males, and in females was contingent upon reproductive events, with feeding mainly taking place just before the in-utero moult of the second-instar larva to the third instar, just after larviposition and again at a more variable time during pregnancy. Comparisons of nutritional status from size, weight, and fat and haematin levels showed that flies from thicket had consistently greater fat reserves than flies from Acacia woodland and conifer plantation. No seasonal differences were found, nor any relationships between other variables. Based on hourly sample data, both sexes showed unimodal diel activity patterns, but with clear differences. Activity was most closely correlated with temperature, to a lesser extent with saturation deficit and least with light intensity, and better correlations were obtained with females than males. Diel activity patterns in both sexes were also age-related, and from the close similarity found between male and virgin female activity patterns it was inferred that male activity around traps was partly sexually oriented. Using electric screens in conjunction with biconical traps, comparisons between flies attracted to traps and those actually caught showed that traps were relatively more efficient in catching males than females, but captures were representative of the active population in terms of age and pregnancy.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 317 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, J. & Crump, A. J. (1978). The control of circadian activity rhythms in tsetse flies: environment or physiological clock?—Physiol. Entomol. 3, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1955). The natural history of tsetse flies. An account of the biology of the genus Glossina (Diptera).—816 pp. London, H. K. Lewis (Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. trop. Med. no. 10).Google Scholar
Challier, A. (1965). Amélioration de la méthode de détermination de l'âge physiologique des glossines. Etudes faites sur Glossina palpalis gambiensis Vanderplank, 1949.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 58, 250–259.Google Scholar
Challier, A. (1973). Écologie de Glossina palpalis gambiensis Vanderplank, 1949 (Diptera-Muscidae) en savane d'Afrique Occidentale.—274 pp. Paris, ORSTOM (Mem. ORSTOM no. 64).Google Scholar
Challier, A. & Laveissière, C. (1973). Un nouveau piège pour la capture des glossines (Glossina: Diptera, Muscidae): description et essais sur le terrain.—Cah. ORSTOM, Sér. Entomol. méd. Parasitol. 11, 251–262.Google Scholar
Crump, A. J. & Brady, J. (1979). Circadian activity patterns in three species of tsetse fly: Glossina palpalis, austeni and amorsitans.—Physiol. Entomol. 4, 311–318.Google Scholar
England, E. C. & Baldry, D. A. T. (1972). The hosts and trypanosome infection rates of Glossina pallidipes in the Lambwe and Roo valleys.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 47, 785–788.Google ScholarPubMed
Glasgow, J. P. (1961). The feeding habits of Glossina swynnertoni Austen.—J. Anim. Ecol. 30, 77–85.Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. P. (1963). The distribution and abundance of tsetse.—241 pp. Oxford, Pergamon Press (Int. Ser. Monogr. Pure Appl. Biol. vol. 20).Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. P. & Duffy, B. J. (1961). Traps in field studies of Glossina pallidipes Austen.—Bull. ent. Res. 52, 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, J. W. (1981). Discrepancies between estimates of tsetse fly populations using mark-recapture and removal trapping techniques.—J. appl. Ecol. 18, 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, J. M. B. (1965). Activity cycles of Glossina pallidipes Aust., G. palpalis fuscipes Newst. and G. brevipalpis Newst.—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, J. M. B. (1966). Seasonal and diurnal variations in physiological age and trypanosome infection rate of females of Glossina pallidipes Aust., G. palpalis fuscipes Newst. and G. brevipalpis Newst.—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1946). An artificially isolated generation of tsetse flies (Diptera).—Bull. ent. Res. 37, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, C. H. N. (1948). The analysis of a tsetse-fly population. III.—Ann. Eugen. 14, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenson, T. G. T. (1981). Ecology and behaviour of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) in southern Kenya.—Bull. ent. Res. 71, 703–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph, S. E. & Rogers, D. J. (1981). Physiological correlates of the availability of Glossina morsitans centralis Machado to different sampling methods.—Ecol. Entomol. 6, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph, S. E. & Rogers, D. J. (1986). The use of discriminant analysis for the estimation of sampling biases for female tsetse.—Ecol. Entomol. 11, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, D. (1977). Study of a natural population of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes Newstead and a model of fly movement.—J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, D. J. (1984). The estimation of sampling biases for male tsetse.—Insect Sci. Applic. 5, 369–373.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. J. & Randolph, S. E. (1978). Metabolic strategies of male and female tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the field.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, D. J. & Randolph, S. E. (1986). Detection of activity cycles of tsetse from capture-recapture data.—Ecol. Entomol. 11, 95–109.Google Scholar
Saunders, D. S. (1970). Reproduction of Glossina.—pp. 327–344in Mulligan, H. W. (Ed.). The African trypanosomiases.—950 pp. London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Turner, D. A. (1980). A novel marking/release/recapture method for possible use in determining aspects of tsetse fly behaviour.—Insect Sci. Applic. 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
Turner, D. A. (1981). The colonization by the tsetse, Glossina pallidipes Austen, of a unique habitat—exotic coniferous plantation—with special reference to the Lambwe Valley, Kenya.—Insect Sci. Applic. 1, 243–248.Google Scholar
Turner, D. A. (1986). Tsetse and trypanosomiasis in the Lambwe Valley, Kenya.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 80, 592–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, D. A. & Brightwell, R. (1986). An evaluation of a sequential aerial spraying operation against Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the Lambwe Valley of Kenya: aspects of post-spray recovery and evidence of natural population regulation.—Bull. ent. Res. 76, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. A. & Golder, T. K. (1986). Susceptibility to topical applications of endosulfan and dieldrin in sprayed and unsprayed populations of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) in Kenya.—Bull. ent. Res. 76, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. A. & Snow, W. F. (1984). Reproductive abnormality and loss in natural populations of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) in Kenya.—Bull. ent. Res. 74, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplank, F. L. (1948). Studies of the behaviour of the tsetse-fly, Glossina pallidipes, in the field: influence of climatic factors on activity.—J. Anim. Ecol. 17, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Etten, J. (1982). Comparative studies on the diurnal activity pattern in two field and laboratory populations of Glossina pallidipes.—Entomologia exp. appl. 32, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1974). New field methods for studying the responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to hosts.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz, B. G. F. (1970). Hosts of Glossina.—pp. 317–326in Mulligan, H. W. (Ed.). The African trypanosomiases.—950 pp. London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar