Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T11:48:45.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The possible use of methyl 4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate, an ant trail pheromone, as a component of an improved bait for leaf-cutting ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. W. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Zoology, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
J. M. Cherrett
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Zoology, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.

Abstract

A trail pheromone, methyl 4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate (M4MP2C), of Atta texana (Buckley) was tested in the laboratory as a possible component of attractive poison bait for the leaf-cutting ants A. cephalotes (L.), A. sexdens (L.) and Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich). For all three species, M4MP2C when impregnated onto paper discs increased pick-up of the discs. It also increased pick-up by Atta sexdens of a citrus-pulp bait. The addition of M4MP2C made them easier to find, although at high concentrations it was repellent. It did not affect the average number of ant investigations before the bait was picked up. The pheromone remained on citrus-pulp bait in active concentrations for approximately four days. To test -the effect of M4MP2C as a foraging stimulant for A. cephalotes, an apparatus was constructed in which the ants passed in single file over a transparent section of the trail where they were counted with a photoelectric cell. When bait impregnated with M4MP2C was placed on the foraging table, large increases in activity were recorded away from the nest but only small increases were recorded in the nest and at the nest entrance. When air containing M4MP2C vapour was injected into the fungus chamber, an increase in activity was recorded at the nest entrance, but this increase was not repeated when known amounts of the pheromone impregnated onto baits of filter-paper discs were added directly to the fungus chamber. It is suggested that factors other than M4MP2C are also involved in the stimulation of foraging activity. The experiments suggest that M4MP2C could play some part in the formulation of an attractive bait for the control of leaf-cutting ants.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, N. T. J. (1959). Statistical methods in biology.—200 pp. London, English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Cherrett, J. M. (1968). The foraging behaviour of Atta cephalotes L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). I. Foraging pattern and plant species attacked in tropical rain forest.—J. Anim. Ecol. 37, 387403.Google Scholar
Cherrett, J. M. (1972). Chemical aspects of plant attack by leaf-cutting ants, pp. 1324 in Harborne, J. B. (Ed.). Phytochemical ecology.—272 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cherrett, J. M. & Seaforth, C. E. (1970). Phytochemical arrestants for the leaf-cutting ants, Atta cephalotes (L.) and Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich), with some notes on the ants' response.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 615625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibley, G. C. & Lewis, T. (1972). An ant counter and its use in the field.—Entomologia exp. appl. 15, 499508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T. (1972). Aerial baiting to control leaf-cutting ants.—PANS 18, 7174.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. (1973). Aerial baiting to control leaf-cutting ants (Formicidae, Attini) in Trinidad. II. Field application, nest mortality and the effect on other animals.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 275287.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. & Phillips, F. T. (1973). Aerial baiting to control leaf-cutting ants (Formicidae, Attini) in Trinidad. I. The bait, its production, and the effects of weathering on attractiveness and persistence of toxicants.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 263273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, J. C. (1967). Trails of the leafcutters.—Nat. Hist. N.Y., 76, 3235.Google Scholar
Mustafa, A. H. I. (1971). Synthetic baits for leaf-cutting ants.—M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Wales.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. W. & Cherrett, J. M. (1973). Studies on the use of leaf-cutting ant scent trail pheromones as attractants in baits.—Proc. Congr. Int. Un. Study soc. Insects VII, 332338.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. W. & Cherrett, J. M. (1975). Some reactions of leaf-cutting ants (Attini: Formicidae) to a synthetic scent trail pheromone, pp. 9197in Noirot, Ch., Howse, P. E. and LeMasne, G. (Eds.). Pheromones and defensive secretions in social insects. —Proceedings of a symposium.—248 pp. Dijon, International Union for the Study of Social Insects.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. W., Moser, J. C., Blum, M. S. & Amante, E. (1974). Laboratory investigations of the trail-following responses of four species of leaf-cutting ants with notes on the specificity of a trial pheromone of Atta texana (Buckley).—Insectes Soc. 21, 8794.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology.—5th ed., 534 pp. Ames, Iowa St. Coll. Pr.Google Scholar
Tumlinson, J. W., Silverstein, R. M., Moser, J. C., Brownlee, R. G. & Ruth, J. M. (1971). Identification of the trail pheromone of the leaf-cutting ant Atta texana (Buckley).—Nature, Lond. 234, 348349.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1962). Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith). I. The organization of mass-foraging.—Anim. Behav. 10, 134147.Google Scholar