Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T18:33:17.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A rapid radioimmunoassay for the detection of Mansonia antigen (Diptera: Culicidae): its potential use as a sensitive method for studying predator- prey relationships1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Donald L. Bailey ,
Angela L. Choate  and
Michael J. P. Lawman
Donald L. Bailey
Affiliation:
Insects Affecting Man and Animals Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, Florida 32604, USA
Angela L. Choate
Affiliation:
Insects Affecting Man and Animals Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, Florida 32604, USA
Michael J. P. Lawman
Affiliation:
Insects Affecting Man and Animals Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, Florida 32604, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A radioimmunoassay (RIA) was developed that utilizes 125I-linked Protein A as a tracer to detect the presence of antibodies to an antigen of Mansonia larvae. Antiserum was made by periodic injections of ground gut of fourth-instar larvae of M. dyari Belkin, Heinemann & Page into a rabbit, bleeding the rabbit by cardiac puncture and separating the serum. Using the rabbit antiserum at various dilutions, the specificity of the antibody to Mansonia was examined in tests with seven other mosquito species of different genera. Although there was low-level cross-reactivity with all the other species, the differences in reactivity between those and Mansonia larvae ranged between 2·5 and 8·4-fold; therefore, positive identification was possible. Furthermore, one fourth-instar Mansonia larva could be detected within a predator (fourth-instar larvae of Toxorhynchites rutilus rutilus (Coquillett) 48 h after consumption using the RIA.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 141 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1981). Bio-Rad protein assay.—Bio-Rad Tech. Bull. no. 1069, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Boreham, P. F. L. & Ohiagu, C. E. (1978). The use of serology in evaluating invertebrate prey- predator relationships: a review.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, M. M. & Proske, H. O. (1946). Precipitin test for determining natural insect predators of immature mosquitoes.—J. natn. Malar. Soc. 5, 45–56.Google Scholar
Engvall, E. & Perlmann, P. (1971). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G.—Immunochemistry 8, 871–874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenstone, M. H. (1977). A passive haemagglutination inhibition assay for the identification of stomach contents of invertebrate predators.—J. appl. Ecol. 14, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagmann, L. E. (1953). Biology of “Mansonia perturbans” (Walker).—Proc. New Jers. Mosq Exterm. Ass. 40, 141–147.Google Scholar
Hildreth, S. W. & Beaty, B. J. (1984). Detection of eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus anc Highlands J virus antigens within mosquito pools by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). I. A laboratory study.—Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 33, 965–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. V., Bradley, G. H. & McNeel, T. E. (1942). The mosquitoes of the southeasterr states.—Misc. Publs U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 336, 96 pp.Google Scholar
Laurence, B. R. (1960). The biology of two species of mosquito, Mansonia africana (Theobald) and Mansonia uniformis (Theobald), belonging to the subgenus Mansonioides (Diptera Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 51, 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawman, M. J. P., Thurmond, M. C., Reis, K. J., Gauntlett, D. R. & Boyle, M. D. P. (1984). Solid-phase radioimmunoassay for the detection of immunoglobulins against bovine Brucella abortus.—Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 6, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, J. L. & Lu, L. C. (1973). Preference of Mansonia uniformis (Theob.) for specific water hyacinth plants.—Mosquito News 33, 466–467.Google Scholar
Murray, M. D. (1970). The identification of blood meals in biting midges (Culicoides Ceratopogonidae).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 64, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öuchterlony, O. (1958). Diffusion-in-gel methods for immunological analysis.—pp. 1–78 in Kollos, P. (Ed.). Progress in allergy, Volume 5.—508 pp. Basel, Switzerland, Karger Publishers.Google Scholar
Reis, K. J., Ayoub, E. M. & Boyle, M. D. P. (1983). Detection of receptors for the Fc region o IgG on streptococci.—J. Immunol. Methods 59, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1973a). Mortalities of the larvae of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex and detection of predators by the precipitin test.—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1973b). Study of the natural predators of Aedes cantans (Meigen) using the precipitin test.—J. med. Entomol. 10, 503–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tempelis, C. H. & Rodrick, M. L. (1972). Passive hemagglutination inhibition technique for the identification of arthropod blood meals.—Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 21, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Assem, J. (1958). Some experimental evidence for the survival value of the rootpiercing habits of Mansonia larvae (Culicidae) to predators.—Entomologia exp. appl. 1, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz, B. (1956). Identification of blood meals of blood-sucking arthropods.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org 15, 473–490.Google ScholarPubMed
Wide, L. & Porath, J. (1966). Radioimmunoassay of proteins with use of sephadex-coupled antibodies.—Biochim. & Biophys. Acta 130, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, D. A. Jr (1948). Notes on a Mansonia perturbans problem at Edgewood Arsenal Maryland.—Mosquito News 8, 57–60.Google Scholar