Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T05:19:12.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resynthesized lines and cultivars of Brassica napus L. provide sources of resistance to the cabbage stem weevil (Ceutorhynchus pallidactylus (Mrsh.))

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2010

M. Eickermann ,
B. Ulber  and
S. Vidal
M. Eickermann
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, Agricultural Entomology, Georg-August-University, Grisebachstrasse 6, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
B. Ulber
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, Agricultural Entomology, Georg-August-University, Grisebachstrasse 6, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
S. Vidal*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, Agricultural Entomology, Georg-August-University, Grisebachstrasse 6, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +49 (0)551 3912105 E-mail: svidal@gwdg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cabbage stem weevil (Ceutorhynchus pallidactylus (Mrsh.)) (Col., Curculionidae) is a serious pest of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera Metzg.) in central and northern Europe. Although host-plant resistance is a key tool in integrated pest management systems, resistant genotypes are not yet available for this species. Resynthesized rapeseed lines (B. oleracea L.×B. rapa L.) are broadening the genetic diversity and might have potential as sources of resistance to pest insects. The host quality, of nine resynthesized rapeseed lines and six genotypes of B. napus to cabbage stem weevil, was evaluated in laboratory screening tests and in a semi-field experiment. In dual-choice oviposition tests, female C. pallidactylus laid significantly fewer eggs on five resyntheses and on swede cv ‘Devon Champion’ than on the moderately susceptible oilseed rape cv ‘Express’, indicating a lower host quality of these genotypes. Results of laboratory screenings were confirmed in a semi-field experiment, in which twelve genotypes were exposed to C. pallidactylus females. The number of larvae was significantly lower in two resyntheses and in cv ‘Devon Champion’ than in oilseed rape cv WVB 9. The total, as well as individual, glucosinolate (GSL) content in the leaves differed substantially among the genotypes tested. The amount of feeding by larvae of C. pallidactylus, as measured by a stem-injury coefficient, was positively correlated with the indolyl GSL compounds 3-indolylmethyl and 4-methoxy-3-indolylmethyl, and with the aromatic GSL 2-phenylethyl, whereas it was negatively correlated with 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl. Thus, the composition and concentration of GSL compounds within the plant tissue might be a key factor in breeding for pest resistance in oilseed rape.

Keywords

glucosinolateslarval performanceoilseed raperesynthesissemi-field trialstem injury coefficient
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 287 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åhman, I. (1984) Larval feeding period and growth of Dasineura brassicae (Diptera) on Brassica host plants. Oikos 44, 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, D.V., Nilsson, C. & Ulber, B. (2003) Insect pests of oilseed rape crops. pp. 9–41 in Alford, D.V. (Ed.) Biocontrol of Oilseed Rape Pests. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlet, E., Parsons, D., Williams, I.H. & Clark, S.J. (1994) The influence of glucosinolates and sugars on feeding by the cabbage stem flea beetle, Psylliodes chrysocephala. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 73, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H.C., Enqvist, G.M. & Karlsson, B. (1995) Comparison of rapeseed cultivars and resynthesized lines based on allozyme and RFLP markers. Theoretic and Applied Genetics 91, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckmann, K., Möllers, C., Becker, H.C. & Kopisch-Obuch, F.J. (2007) Genetic variation of glucosinolates in young leaves of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). pp. 258–260 in Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress. 26–30 March 2007, Wuhan, China.Google Scholar
Broschewitz, B., Steinbach, P. & Goltermann, S. (1993) The effect of insect larval damage upon the attack of winter oilseed rape by Phoma lingam and Botrytis cinerea. Gesunde Pflanzen 45, 106–110.Google Scholar
Cleemput, S. & Becker, H.C. (2008) Glucosinolate content and composition in the seeds, stems and leaves of Brassica napus. pp. 570–574 in Prohens, J. & Badenes, M.L. (Eds) Modern Variety Breeding for Present and Future Needs. Valencia, Spain, Editorial Universidad Poltécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
Cole, R.A. (1997) The relative importance of glucosinolates and amino acids to the development of two aphid pests Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae on wild and cultivated brassica species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 85, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S.M., Watts, N.P., Castle, L.M. & Williams, I.H. (2006) Determining the sex of insect pests of oilseed rape for behavioural bioassys. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 29(7), 205–211.Google Scholar
Dechert, G. & Ulber, B. (2004) Interactions between the stem-mining weevils Ceutorhynchus napi Gyll. and Ceutorhynchus pallidactylus (Mrsh.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in oilseed rape. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 6, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diederichsen, E. & Sacristan, M.D. (1996) Disease response of resynthesized Brassica napus L. lines carrying different combinations of resistance to Plasmodiophora brassicae Wor. Plant Breeding 115, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, A.W., Klukowski, Z., Walczak, B., Clark, S.J., Mugglestone, M.A., Perry, J.N. & Williams, I.H. (2003) Spatial distribution of pest insects in oilseed rape: implications for integrated pest management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giamoustaris, A. & Mithen, R.F. (1995) The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests. Annals of Applied Biology 126, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girke, A. (2002) Neue Genpools aus resynthetisiertem Raps (Brassica napus L.) für die Hybridzüchtung. PhD thesis, Georg-August-Universität, Goettingen.Google Scholar
Gols, R. & Harvey, J.A. (2009) Plant-mediated effects in the Brassicaceae on the performance and behaviour of parasitoids. Phytochemical Review 8, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, R.J., van Dam, N.M. & van Loon, J.J.A. (2009) Role of Glucosinolates in Insect-Plant Relationships and Multitrophic Interactions. Annual Review of Entomology 54, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkegaard, J. & Sawar, M. (1998) Biofumigation potential of brassicas. I. Variation in glucosinolate profiles of diverse field-grown brassicas. Plant and Soil 201, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lühs, W., Ulber, B., Seyis, F., Frauen, M., Busch, H., Friedt, W., Gustafsson, M. & Poulsen, G. (2003) Evaluation of a Brassica napus core collection and prospects of its exploitation through rapeseed breeding. pp. 371–374 in Proceedings of the 11th International Rapeseed Congress. 2003, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Mrówczyński, M. (1998) Studies on pest damage of cultivars and lines of winter oilseed rape. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 21(5), 153–154.Google Scholar
Mrówczyński, M., Wachowiak, H., Muśnicki, C., Jodłowski, M. & Heimann, S. (2006) Damage of registered Polish winter oilseed rape cultivars caused by pests. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 29(7), 95–96.Google Scholar
Newman, P.L. (1984) The effect of insect larval damage upon the incidence of canker in winter oilseed rape. pp. 815–822 in British Crop Protection Conference (BCPC): Pests and Diseases. 19–22 November 1984, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Pickett, J.A., Smiley, D.W.M. & Woodcock, C.M. (1999) Secondary metabolites in plant-insect interactions: Dynamic systems of induced and adaptive responses. pp. 91–115 in Callow, J.A. (Ed.) Advances in Botanical Research, vol. 30. Oxford, UK, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pontoppidan, B., Hopkins, R., Rask, L. & Meijer, J. (2003) Infestation by cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) on oilseed rape (Brassica napus) causes a long lasting induction of the myrosinase system. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 109, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rask, L., Andréasson, E., Ekbom, B., Eriksson, S., Pontoppidan, B. & Meijer, J. (2000) Myrosinase: gene family evolution and herbivore defense in Brassicaceae. Plant Molecular Biology 42, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roessingh, P., Stadler, E., Baur, R., Hurter, J. & Ramp, T. (1997) Tarsal chemoreceptors and oviposition behaviour of the cabbage root fly (Delia radicum) sensitive to fractions and new compounds of host leaf surface extracts. Physiological Entomology 22, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothe, R., Hartung, H., Marks, G., Bergmann, H., Götz, R. & Schöne, F. (2004) Glucosinolate contents in vegetative tissues of winter rape cultivars. Journal of Applied Botany 78, 41–47.Google Scholar
Rygulla, W., Snowdon, R.J., Eynck, C., Koopmann, B., von Tiedemann, A., Lühs, W. & Friedt, W. (2007) Broadening the genetic basis of Verticillium longisporum resistance in Brasscia napus by interspecific hybridization. Phytopathology 97, 1391–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarfraz, M., Dosdall, L.M. & Keddie, B.A. (2007) Resistance of some cultivated Brassicaceae to infestations by Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 100, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoonhoven, L.M., van Loon, J.J.A. & Dicke, M. (2005) Insect-Plant Biology. 2nd edn. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyis, F., Friedt, W. & Lühs, W. (2000) Resynthese-Raps (Brassica napus L.) als genetische Ressource für die Qualitäts- und Ertragszüchtung. pp. 91–112 in Hammer, K. & Gladis, T. (Eds) Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen, vol. 16: Nutzung genetischer Ressourcen – ökologischer Wert der Biodiversität. Bonn, Germany, ZADI.Google Scholar
Siemens, D.H. & Mitchell-Olds, T. (1996) Glucosinolate and herbivory by specialists (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Leptidoptera: Plutellidae): Consequences of concentration and induced resistance. Environmental Entomology 25, 1344–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toboła, P., Muśnicki, C. & Muśnicka, B. (1996) Ochrona rzepaku ozimego przed szkodnikami a jakość nasion. Progress in Plant Protection 36, 148–151.Google Scholar
Ulmer, B.J. & Dosdall, L.M. (2006) Glucosinolate profile and oviposition behavior in relation to the susceptibilities of Brassicaceae to the cabbage seedpod weevil. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 121, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walczak, B., Kelm, M., Klukowski, Z., Smart, L.E., Ferguson, A.W. & Williams, I.H. (1998) The effect of trap design and 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate on catches of stem weevils (Ceutorhynchus pallidactylus Marsh. and C. napi Gyll.) in winter oilseed rape. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 21(5), 141–146.Google Scholar
Wallsgrove, R., Bennett, R., Kiddle, G., Bartlet, E. & Ludwig-Mueller, J. (1999) Glucosinolate biosynthesis and pest/disease interaction. Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, 1999, 104–107.Google Scholar
Williams, I.H. (2004) Advances in insect pest management of oilseed rape in Europe. pp. 181–208 in Horwitz, A.R. (Ed.) Insect Pest Management. Berlin, Germany, Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, A.L. (1992) Management of oilseed rape pests in Europe. Agricultural Zoology Reviews 5, 51–95.Google Scholar