Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:14:52.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gap Tauberian theorems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Jeff Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Ohio University, Athens OH 45701, United States of America
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the first section we establish a connection between gap Tauberian conditions and isomorphic copies of Co for perfect coregular conservative BK spaces and in the second we give a characterisation of gap Tauberian conditions for strong summability with respect to a nonnnegative regular summability matrix. These results are used to show that a gap Tauberian condition for strong weighted mean summability is also a gap Tauberian condition for ordinary weighted mean summability. We also make a remark regarding the support set of a matrix and give a Tauberian theorem for a class of conull spaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]Atalla, R., ‘On the multiplicative behaviour of regular matrices’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 26 (1970), 437446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Connor, J., ‘Two valued measures and summability’, Analysis 10 (1990), 373385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Connor, J. and Snyder, A.K., ‘Tauberian theorems for conull spaces’, Internal. J. Math. Math. Sci. 8 (1985), 689692.Google Scholar
[4]Diestel, J., Sequences and series in Banach spaces (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Freedman, A.R. and Sember, J.J., ‘Densities and summability’, Pacific J. Math. 95 (1981), 293305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fridy, J., ‘Tauberian theorems via block dominated matrices’, Pacific J. Math 81 (1979), 8191.Google Scholar
[7]Fridy, J., ‘On statistical convergence’, Analysis 5 (1985), 301313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions, University Series in Higher Math. (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Henriksen, M., ‘Multiplicative summability methods and the Stone-Čech compactification’, Math. Z. 71 (1959), 427435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hill, J.D. and Sledd, W.T., ‘Approximation in bounded summability fields’, Canad. J. Math. 20 (1968), 410415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Maddox, I.J., ‘A Tauberian theorem for statistical convergence’, Math. Proc. Cambridge. Philos. Soc. 106 (1989), 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Rudin, W., ‘Homogeneity problems in the theory of Cech compactifications’, Duke Math. J. 23 (1956), 409420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Wilansky, A., Summability through functional analysis (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar