Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T21:20:16.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SECOND HANKEL DETERMINANT FOR LOGARITHMIC INVERSE COEFFICIENTS OF CONVEX AND STARLIKE FUNCTIONS

Part of: Geometric function theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2024

VASUDEVARAO ALLU Open the ORCID record for VASUDEVARAO ALLU [Opens in a new window]  and
AMAL SHAJI
VASUDEVARAO ALLU*
Affiliation:
School of Basic Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 752050, Odisha, India
AMAL SHAJI
Affiliation:
School of Basic Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 752050, Odisha, India e-mail: amalmulloor@gmail.com
*
e-mail: avrao@iitbbs.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We obtain sharp bounds for the second Hankel determinant of logarithmic inverse coefficients for starlike and convex functions.

Keywords

univalent functionlogarithmic coefficientHankel determinantstarlike and convex functionSchwarz function

MSC classification

Primary: 30C45: Special classes of univalent and multivalent functions (starlike, convex, bounded rotation, etc.)
Secondary: 30C50: Coefficient problems for univalent and multivalent functions 30C55: General theory of univalent and multivalent functions
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , First View , pp. 1 - 12
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research of the first author is supported by SERB-CRG, Govt. of India, and the research of the second author is supported by UGC-JRF.

References

Ali, M. F. and Allu, V., ‘On logarithmic coefficients of some close-to-convex functions’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146 (2017), 1131–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, M. F. and Allu, V., ‘Logarithmic coefficients of some close-to-convex functions’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 95 (2017), 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allu, V. and Arora, V., ‘Second Hankel determinant of logarithmic coefficients of certain analytic functions’, Preprint, 2021, arXiv:2110.05161.Google Scholar
Allu, V., Arora, V. and Shaji, A., ‘On the second Hankel determinant of logarithmic coefficients for certain univalent functions’, Mediterr. J. Math. 20 (2023), Article no. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allu, V., Lecko, A. and Thomas, D. K., ‘Hankel, Toeplitz and Hermitian–Toeplitz determinants for Ozaki close-to-convex functions’, Mediterr. J. Math. 19 (2022), Article no. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, N. E., Kowalczyk, B., Kwon, O., Lecko, A. and Sim, Y., ‘On the third logarithmic coefficient in some subclasses of close-to-convex functions’, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. (Esp.) 114 (2020), Article no. 52.Google Scholar
Cho, N. E., Kowalczyk, B. and Lecko, A., ‘Sharp bounds of some coefficient functionals over the class of functions convex in the direction of the imaginary axis’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 100 (2019), 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. H., Kim, Y. C. and Sugawa, T., ‘A general approach to the Fekete–Szegö problem’, J. Math. Soc. Japan 59 (2007), 707–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Branges, L., ‘A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture’, Acta Math. 154 (1985), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duren, P. L., Univalent Functions, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 259 (Springer, New York–Berlin–Heidelberg–Tokyo, 1983).Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, B. and Lecko, A., ‘Second Hankel determinant of logarithmic coefficients of convex and starlike functions of order alpha’, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 45 (2022), 727–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczyk, B. and Lecko, A., ‘Second Hankel determinant of logarithmic coefficients of convex and starlike functions’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 105 (2022), 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczyk, B. and Lecko, A., ‘The second Hankel determinant of the logarithmic coefficients of strongly starlike and strongly convex functions’, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 117 (2023), Article no. 91.Google Scholar
Libera, R. J. and Zlotkiewicz, E. J., ‘Early coefficients of the inverse of a regular convex function’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 85 (1982), 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libera, R. J. and Zlotkiewicz, E. J., ‘Coefficient bounds for the inverse of a function with derivatives in $\mathscr{P}$ ’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 87 (1983), 251–257.Google Scholar
Löwner, K., ‘Untersuchungenuber schlichte konforme Abbildungen des Einheitskreises I’, Math. Ann. 89 (1923), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milin, I. M., Univalent Functions and Orthonormal Systems, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 49 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1977).Google Scholar
Mundalia, M. and Kumar, S. S., ‘Coefficient problems for certain close-to-convex functions’, Bull. Iranian Math. Soc. 49 (2023), Article no. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommerenke, Ch., Univalent Functions (Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1975).Google Scholar
Ponnusamy, S., Sharma, N. L. and Wirths, K. J., ‘Logarithmic coefficients of the inverse of univalent functions’, Results Math. 73 (2018), Article no. 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponnusamy, S., Sharma, N. L. and Wirths, K. J., ‘Logarithmic coefficients problems in families related to starlike and convex functions’, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 109 (2020), 230–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar