Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T13:04:38.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trees as commutative BCK-Algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

William H. Cornish
William H. Cornish
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new method of constructing commutative BCK-algebras is given. It depends upon the notion of a valuation of a lower semilattice in a given commutative BCK-algebra. Any tree vith the descending chain condition has a valuation in the natural numbers, considered as a commutative BCK-algebra; the valuation is the height-function. Thus, any tree of finite height possesses a uniquely determined commutative BCK-structure. The finite trees with at most one atom and height at most n are precisely the finitely generated subdirectly irreducible (simple) algebras in the subvariety of commutative BCK-algebras which satisfy the identity (En): xyn = xyn+1. Due to congruence-distributivity, it is then possible to describe the associated lattice of subvarieties.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 181 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1981

References

[1]Comer, Stephen D., “The representation of implicative BCK-algebras”, Math. Japonica 25 (1980), 111–115.Google Scholar
[2]Cornish, William H., “A multiplier approach to implicative BCK-algebras”, Math. Sem. Notes Kobe Univ. 8 (1980), 157–169.Google Scholar
[3]Cornish, William H., “3-permutability and quasicommutative BCK-algebras”, Math. Japonica 25 (1980), 477–496.Google Scholar
[4]Cornish, William H., “Varieties generated by finite BCK-algebras”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 22 (1980), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Cornish, William H., “On Iséki's BCK-algebras”, Proceedings of the Western Australian Algebra Conference, Perth, 1980 (to appear).Google Scholar
[6]Davey, Brian A., “On the lattice of subvarieties”, Houston J. Math. 5 (1979), 183–192.Google Scholar
[7]Iséki, Kiyoshi, “On finite BCK-algebras”, Math. Japonica 25 (1980), 225–229.Google Scholar
[8]Iséki, Kiyoshi and Tanaka, Shotaro, “Ideal theory of BCK-algebras”, Math. Japonica 21 (1976), 351–366.Google Scholar
[9]Iséki, Kiyoshi and Tanaka, Shotaro, “An introduction to the theory of BCK-algebras”, Math. Japonica 23 (1978), 1–26.Google Scholar
[10]Komori, Yuichi, “Super-Lukasiewicz implicational logics”, Nagoya Math. J. 72 (1978), 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Knuth, Donald E., The art of computer programming. Volume 1: Fundamental algorithm, 2nd edition (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts; Menlo Park, California; London; 1973).Google Scholar
[12]Romanowska, Anna and Traczyk, Tadeusz, “On commutative BCK-algebras”, preprint.Google Scholar
[13]Setō, Yasuo, “Some examples of BCK-algebras”, Math. Sem. Notes Kobe Univ. 5 (1977), 397–400.Google Scholar
[14]Traczyk, Tadeusz, “On the variety of bounded commutative BCK-algebras algebras”, Math. Japonica 24 (1979), 283–292.Google Scholar
[15]Yutani, Hiroshi, “On a system of axioms of a commutative BCK-algebra”, Math. Sem. Notes Kobe Univ. 5 (1977), 255–256.Google Scholar