Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:17:29.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bethlem and Maudsley Hospital item sheets (B-MIS)

The development and reliability of an instrument for routine collection of summary clinical data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jeremy Turk ,
Nasser F. Loza ,
Jan Kasinski ,
Randy Katz ,
Peter McGuffin  and
Robin Murray
Jeremy Turk
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH (address for correspondence)
Nasser F. Loza
Affiliation:
Behman Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
Jan Kasinski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children
Randy Katz
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5
Peter McGuffin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff
Robin Murray
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Bethlem and Maudsley Hospital item sheets (B-MIS) are summaries in coded form which are completed for every patient admitted or readmitted to the joint hospitals. The Part 1 item sheet contains information which is included in the Part 1 case summary, as described in Notes on Eliciting and Recording Clinical Information, and is completed at the same time as the summary is prepared; that is, usually within a fortnight of the patient entering hospital. Similarly, the Part 2 item sheet contains information normally found in the discharge summary, and is completed at the same time that this summary is prepared; shortly after the patient has left hospital. The item sheets are restricted to pieces of information which can be readily coded by the registrar. Thus, of necessity, they concentrate on relatively ‘hard’ data.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 12 , Issue 10 , October 1988 , pp. 422 - 426
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988

References

1. Hill, D., Birley, J. L. T., Cawley, R. H., Kendell, R. E., Lishman, W. A., Post, F., Rutter, M., Wing, J. K. & Wolff, H. H. (1973) Notes on Eliciting and Recording Clinical Information. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2. Kendell, R. E. & Gourlay, J. (1970) The clinical distinction between psychotic and neurotic depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 117, 257–260.Google Scholar
3. Shur, E. (1982) Season of birth in high and low genetic risk schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 410–415.Google Scholar
4. Grosz, H. J. & Grossman, K. G. (1964) The sources of observer variation and bias in clinical judgments, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 138, 105–113.Google Scholar
5. Grosz, H. J. & Grossman, K. G. (1968) The relationship between neurosis and psychosis, British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 189–192.Google Scholar
6. Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
7. Cicchetti, D. V. (1978) Assessing observer and method variability in medicine. Connecticut Medicine, 42, 253–256.Google Scholar
8. Thorley, G. (1982) The Bethlem Royal & Maudsley Hospitals Clinical Data Register for Children and Adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 5, 179–190.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.