Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T19:00:26.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the Khotanese Saṅghāṭasūtra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Extract

The Saṅghāṭasūtra (Sgh) is one of the most extensively preserved Old Khotanese texts, together with the Book of Zambasta (Z) and the Suvarṇabhāsasūtra (Suv).1 Unlike Z which is known chiefly from one manuscript and only a few fragmentary variants from other manuscripts, the Sgh is represented by a large number of fragments belonging to several manuscripts. We now have Giotto Canevascini to thank for the publication of virtually all the extant manuscript material belonging to the Khotanese Sgh, originally the author's doctoral dissertation prepared under the supervision of R. E. Emmerick and submitted in 1992 at the University of Hamburg.2 It constitutes a major contribution to Khotanese research and to Iranian and Buddhist studies as well: it is of note, for instance, that Canevascini could demonstrate that the oldest manuscript of Sgh already contains textual corruptions revealing that it is actually a copy from a still older manuscript (p. xv), and that his chronological arrangement of the manuscripts provides definitive evidence that the spellings g, ś and ṣ precede, in Old Khotanese, the spellings gg, śś and ṣṣ (pp. xv–xvi) as suggested by E. Leumann, Buddhistische Literatur, nordarisch und deutsch, I. Teil, Nebenstücke (Leipzig, 1920), 92 (cf. Ṡgs., xix).

Type
Notes and Communications
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Degener, A. 1989. Khotanische Suffixe. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dresden, M. J. 1977a. ‘Khotanese (Saka) manuscripts: a provisional handlist’, in Varia 1976 (Acta Iranica, 12), Leiden, 2785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresden, M. J. 1977b. ‘A lyrical poem in Khotanese, Part I: Text’, in Beiträge zur Indienforschung Ernst Waldschmidt zum 80. Geburtstag gewidmet, Berlin, 81103.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1965. ‘Syntax of the cases in Khotanese’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies XXVIII, 1: 2433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1968a. The book of Zambasta: a Khotanese poem on Buddhism, London.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1968b. ‘Khotanese metrics’, Asia Major, 14, 120.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1968c. Saka grammatical studies, London.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1970. The Khotanese Sūraṅgamasamādhisūtra, London.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1993. ‘Notes on the Crosby collection’, in Medioiranica: proceedings of the International Colloquium organized by the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven from the 21st to the 23rd of May 1990, ed by Skalmowski, W. and Tongerloo, A. van, Leuven, 5764.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. and Pulleyblank, E. G.. 1993. A Chinese text in Central Asian Brahmi script: new evidence for the pronunciation of Late Middle Chinese and Khotanese, Rome.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1992. A guide to the literature of Khotan. 2nd ed, rev. and enlarged. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. and Vorob'ëva-Desjatovskaja, M. I.. 1993. Saka Documents VII: the St. Petersburg collections (Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum, pt. 2, vol. 5), London.Google Scholar
Maggi, M. 1995a. The Khotanese Karmavibhaṅga, Rome.Google Scholar
Maggi, M. 1995b. ‘Late Khotanese numerals from 1 to 36 in Tibetan transcription’, in Proceedings of the second European Conference of Iranian Studies held in Bamberg, September 30th–October 4th, 1991 by the Societas Iranologica Europaea, ed. by Fragner, B. G., et at, Rome, 425443.Google Scholar
Reuter, J. N. 19131918. ‘Some Buddhist fragments from Chinese Turkestan in Sanskrit and “Khotanese”’, Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne, 30, 137.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, N. 1990. ‘Chotano-sogdica II: aspects of the development of nominal morphology in Khotanese and Sogdian’, in Proceedings of the first European Conference of Iranian Studies held in Turin, September 7th–11th, 1987 by the Societas Iranologica Europaea, Pt. 1:Google Scholar
Old and Middle Iranian studies, ed. by Gnoli, G. and Panaino, A., Rome, 275296.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P. O. 1983. ‘The Khotanese Suvarṇabhāsottamasūtra, Pt. 1: The manuscripts: transcription with critical apparatus and indices; Pt. 2: Synoptic Khotanese text and English translation containing the corresponding Sanskrit text compared with the Tibetan and Chinese versions; Pt.3: Commentary.’ (Unpublished Habilitation thesis, Mainz.)Google Scholar
Stein, M. A. 1907. Ancient Khotan: detailed report of archaeological explorations in Chinese Turkestan carried out and described under the orders of H. M. Indian Government, Oxford, 2 vols.Google Scholar