Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T08:55:02.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Raiding, reaction and rivalry: The Shāhsevan tribes in the constitutional period1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Richard Tapper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Shāhsevan tribes of Azarbayjan were involved in various important events during the Constitutional period. In spring 1908, border incidents in Shāhsevan territory, between tribesmen and Russian frontier guards, provided the Russians with a pretext for military intervention in Azarbayjan on a scale which hastened the fall of the Constitutionalist government in Tehran. During the winter of 1908–9, there were some Shāhsevan among the reactionary forces which besieged Tabrīz. In late 1909 most of the Shāhsevan chiefs joined a Union of tribes of eastern Azarbayjan, which proclaimed opposition to the Constitution and the intention of marching on Tehran and restoring the deposed Muḥammad 'Alī Shāh. They plunde ed Ardabīl, receiving wide coverage in the European press, but were soon subdued by Nationalist forces during that winter and spring 1910. Subsequently the Shāhsevan were regarded as dangerous potential support for muḥammad 'Ali, while the main activity of their warriors was resistance to the occupying Russian forces.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , October 1986 , pp. 508 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Abbreviations

Isāil, Amir-Khizi, 1960/1339. Qiyāarbāyjān va Sattār Khān. Tabirz. Averyanow, 1900 = Shkinskiy, Ya. F and P. I. Averynov. Otchet o poyezdke po severnomu Aze baydzhanu v kontse 1899 g. Tiffi.Google Scholar
Bāybūurdi, Husayn. 1962/1341.Tārīkh-i Arasbārān. Tehran.Google Scholar
Browne, E. G. 1964. Nationalism in Iran. PittsburghGoogle Scholar
Farzād, Ḥusan. 1945/1324. Inqilāb va taḥavvul-i Ā1E93;arbāyjān. Tabriz.Google Scholar
Gazetteer, , 1914. Gazetteer of Persia, part 2. Simla.Google Scholar
Good, Mary-Jo Delvecchio, 1977. ‘Social hierarchy in provincial Iran: the case of Qajar Maragheh’, Iranian Studies, X, 3, 126–63.Google Scholar
Khakhanov, A. 1908. ‘Shakhseveni (k sobitiyam na Kavkazak. granitse)’ Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society, XLVIII, 2: 123–39.Google Scholar
Moore, Arthur. 1914. The Orient Express, London.Google Scholar
Mujtahidi, Pierre. 1964. ‘The tribes of Qar–ca D–ġ’ Oriens, XVII, 60–95.Google Scholar
Rostopchin, F.B. 1933. Zametki o Shakhsevenakh,Sovetskaya Etnografiya, 3, 4: 88–118.Google Scholar
Bābā, Ṣafari, 1971/1344. Khīau yā Mishkīnshahr: ka'bh-yi yāylāqāt-i Shāhsevan. Tehran.Google Scholar
, Tāhirzādeh-Bihzādeh-Bihzād. 1955. Qīyām-i Āẕarbāyjān dar inqilāb-i mashrūṠīyat-i Irān. Tehran.Google Scholar
Tapper, Richard, 1972, The Shahsavan of Azarbayjan: a study of political and economic change in a middle Eastern tribal society. Unpublished thesis, university of london.Google Scholar
Tapper, Richard, 1974, ‘Shahsevan in 1E62;afavid Persia’,BSOAS, XXXVII, 2: 321–54.Google Scholar
Tapper, Richard, 1983, ‘Nomads and Commissars in the Mughan steppe: the shahsevan tribes in the Great Game’. In Richard, Tapper (ed,), The conflict of tribe and state in Iran and Afghanistan. Londonand New York.Google Scholar
Tigranov, L.F. 1909. Iz obshchestvenno-ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy v Persii. Svodka putevikh materialov i nablyudeniy o zemlevladenii, podatnoy (maliat) i administrativnoy sistemakh, St. Petersburg. [also Tiffis (1905?)].Google Scholar
Von Hahn, C. 1910. ‘Die Schachsewenon und die russische Strafexpedition auf persisches Gebiet’ Asien, IX 5: 66 f.Google Scholar
Wratislaw, A. C. 1924. A Consul in the East. Edinburgh.Google Scholar