No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Some observations on the sub-group Tamil-Malayalam: differential realizations of the cluster *ṉt
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
Extract
The languages belonging to the South-Dravidian sub-group of the Dravidian languages exhibit various degrees of genetic relationship. Though the common retentions and the later innovations have led to an indisputable consensus on broad issues, details regarding the finer genetic relationship remain to be worked out. This paper tries to analyse the genetic relationship between Tamil and Malayalam in the light of some sound changes, and also discusses the problems involved in the interpretation of the linguistic material.
All the comparative evidence points to a closer relationship between Tamil and Malayalam. They preserve alike some of the Proto-South-Dravidian features such as *ḻ, *ṛṛ besides innovating sound changes such as *k– > c–. On the basis of a number of common phonological and morphological features, scholars concluded that at the stage known as late Old and early Middle Tamil, Tamil and Malayalam were most probably basically one language with pre- Malayalam as a diverging western dialect of the spoken form of that common language. The innovations which appeared in the ninth- and tenth-century West Coast inscriptions were linked with the similar tendencies observed in colloquial Tamil. The oldest Malayalam inscriptions and literary texts are not earlier than about the ninth century A.D. Since this period is contemporaneous with Middle Tamil, it was argued that the development of a separate language had to be dated to that period.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 87 - 99
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1990
References
Andronov, M.. 1963–1964. ‘Lexicostatistic analysis of the chronology of disintegration of Proto-Dravidian’;, Indo-Iranian Journal, VII, 170–86.Google Scholar
Asher, R. E.. 1969. ‘Classification of Tamil and Malayalam verbs—a comparative study’, in ed. S., Agesthialingom and N., Kumaraswami Raja, Dravidian Linguistics (Seminar Papers). Annamalainagar: Annamalai University, 249–68.Google Scholar
Asher, R. E.. 1986. ‘Comparative problems in the noun morphology of Tamil and Malayalam’;, International Seminar on Dravidian Linguistics, Trivandrum, pp. 1–12 [in press].Google Scholar
Nair, B. Gopinathan. 1984. ‘Phonological interpretation of diphthongs in South Dravidian’;, International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, XIII, 2: 306–30.Google Scholar
Pillai, N. R. Gopinatha. 1978. ‘Descriptive grammar of Eḻuttacchan’;s Adhyātma Rāmāyaṇam unpublished dissertation, University of Kerala, Trivandrum.Google Scholar
Govindankutty, A.. 1972. ‘From Proto-Tamil-Malayalam to West Coast dialects’;, Indo-Iranian Journal, XIV, 1/2: 52–60.Google Scholar
Govindankutty, A.. 1972. ‘A grammatical study of Kamparāmāyanam’;, unpublished dissertation, University of Kerala, Trivandrum. [Introduction I-XVlII, Grammar 1–526, Index 1–2468.]Google Scholar
Rev. Gundert, H.. 1962. MalayĀḷa bhāsā vyĀkaraṇam. Kottayam: National Book Stall [repr.].Google Scholar
Kameswari, T. M.. 1969. ‘The chronology of Dravidian languages—a lexico-statistic analysis’;, in ed. S, Agesthialingom and N, Kumaraswami Raja, Dravidian Linguistics (Seminar Papers). Annamalainagar: Annamalai University, 269–74.Google Scholar
Chetty, M. Kandappa. 1969. ‘Proto-Dravidian nr in Telugu’;, in ed. S, Agesthialingom and N, Kumaraswami Raja, Dravidian Linguistics (Seminar Papers). Annamalainagar: Annamalai University, 219–32.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh.. 1976. Review of Kamil Zvelebil's Comparative Dravidian phonology (1970), Lingua, [Amsterdam], 39: 139–53.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh.. 1978. ‘On diachronic and synchronic rules in phonology—a case from Parji’;, Indian Linguistics, [Poona], 39: 252–76.Google Scholar
Raja, N. Kumaraswami. 1980. ‘Geminate dental/alveolar nasal in Malayalam–a historical study’;, Journal of Tamil Studies, 18: 15–26.Google Scholar
Panikkar, G. K.. 1973. Description of the Ernad dialect of Malayalam. Trivandrum: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Nair, M. M. Puroshottaman. 1980. Rāmacarilattilninnu Mahābhāratattilēkku. Trichur: Current Books.Google Scholar
Aiyar, L. V. Ramaswami. 1936. The evolution of Malayalam morphology. Ernakulam: Rama Varma Research Institute.Google Scholar
Aiyar, L. V. Ramaswami. 1937. ‘Dravidic sandhi’;, Quarterly Journal of the Mythic Society, XXVII, 3/4: 239–265.Google Scholar
Aiyar, L. V. Ramaswami. 1938, 1939. ‘A primer of Malayalam phonology’;, Bulletin of the Rama Varma Research Institute [Trichur], VI, 1 and 2: 7–30, 91–108; VII, 2: 102–17.Google Scholar
Sekhar, A. C.. 1953. Evolution of Malayalam. (Deccan College Dissertation Series, 10.) Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V.. 1972. ‘Dental and Alveolar nasals in Dravidian’;, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, XXXV, 1: 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V.. 1976. ‘Malayāḷabhāṣayuṭe rūpīkaraṇavum vaḷarccayum’;, in ed. Variar, K. M. Prabhakara, DrĀviḍa bhāṣāsāstra paṭanaṅṅaḷ. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University, 93–156.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, P. S.. 1971. Dravidian verb morphology. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Subramoniam, V. I.. 1969. ‘Malayalam’;, in Current Trends in Linguistics, V. The Hague: Mouton, 372–81.Google Scholar
Subramoniam, V. I.. 1972. ‘Rules of nasal assimilation in Malayalam’;, International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, I, 1: 137–43.Google Scholar
Vacek, J.. 1978. ‘The palatal nasal in Tamil’;, International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, VII, 2: 221–38.Google Scholar
Velupillai, A.. 1976. Study of the dialects in inscriptional Tamil. Trivandrum: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, K. V.. 1971. ‘From Proto-South Dravidian to Old Tamil and Malayalam’;, Proceedings of the second International Conference-Seminar of Tamil Studies, Vol. I. Madras, 54–72.Google Scholar