Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T09:36:32.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leveraging Green Power: Environmental Rules for Project Finance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Marcus Schaper
Marcus Schaper*
Affiliation:
Reed College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Environmental policies of providers of international finance – namely the World Bank, export credit agencies, and Equator Principles banks – provide interesting cases within which to study the power of business not as only an input to the political process or as a constraint on politics, but also as a conduit for both state and non-state actors.

This paper shows how targeting financial actors has allowed NGOs to transform their rather weak discursive power base into instrumental power over business actors in other sectors. NGOs have channeled their power through states, consumers, and financial institutions; this has allowed them to augment discursive power over their targets with additional indirect, yet more immediate, forms of structural and instrumental power. As a consequence of both direct and indirect NGO pressure, financial institutions have adopted environmental policies. This article posits a theoretical explanation of the underspecified power relationships in NGO strategies that allow NGOs to exploit weak links in commodity chains for their campaigns.

This paper argues that financial institutions wield considerable structural power through their ability to control access to finance. It is particularly this power base which has made them prime targets for NGOs campaigning for the greening of infrastructure development projects. As a consequence of NGO pressure, financial institutions have adopted environmental policies which in turn have provided the World Bank and Equator banks with additional sources of discursive power.

Keywords

World Bankexport credit agenciesEquator Principles
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 9 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Business Power and Global Governance , December 2007 , pp. 1 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2007 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allegra, Francis M. 1980. “Executive Order 12,114 - Environmental Effects Abroad: Does It Really Further the Purpose of NEPA?” Cleveland State Law Review 29: 109–39.Google Scholar
Amalric, Franck. 2005. The Equator Principles: A Step Towards Sustainability. Working Paper 01/05. Zurich: Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability at the University of Zurich.Google Scholar
BankTrack. 2003. Collevecchio Declaration: The Role and Responsibility of Financial Institutions. BankTrack, http://www.banktrack.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/0_BT_Colleveccio_material/collevecchio_declaration__new_layout.pdf. (accessed 21 May, 2004).Google Scholar
BankTrack. 2006. Equator Principles II: NGO Comments on the Proposed Revision of the Equator Principles. Utrecht: BankTrack.Google Scholar
BankTrack. 2005. History. http://www.banktrack.org/?show=32&visitor=1. (accessed 14 November, 2005).Google Scholar
Berne Declaration, Bioforum, Center for International Environmental Law, Environmental Defense Fund, Eurodad, Friends of the Earth, Pacific Environment & Resources Center, and Urgewald. 1999. A Race to the Bottom: Creating Risk, Generating Debt and Guaranteeing Environmental Destruction.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, Brent. 2001. Greening the Export-Import Bank. Testimony before the House Financial Services, International Monetary Policy, and Trade Subcommittee. Washington, DC: Friends of the Earth.Google Scholar
Bøås, Morten. 2001 “Multilateral Development Banks, Environmental Impact Assessments, and Nongovernmental Organizations in U.S. Foreign Policy.” In The Environment, International Relations, and U.S. Foreign Policy, edited by Harris, Paul G. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chan-Fishel, Michelle. 2005. Unproven Principles - the Equator Principles at Year Two: An Anniversary Assessment. BankTrack.Google Scholar
Citigroup. 2004. Enhanced Citigroup Environmental Policy. Citigroup, http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/environment/gcibpolicy.htm. (accessed 21 May, 2004).Google Scholar
Clark, Dana, Fox, Jonathan, and Treakle, Kay, eds. 2003. Demanding Accountability: Civil Society Claims and the World Bank Inspection Panel. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2: 201–15.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., Downes, David, Hunold, Christian, Schlosberg, David, and Hernes, Hans-Kristian. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Environmental Defense Fund v. United States Agency for International Development, 6 Environmental Law Reporter 20121 (1976).Google Scholar
The “Equator Principles” - a Financial Industry Benchmark for Determining, Assessing and Managing Social and Environmental Risk in Project Financing. 2006.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter C. “International Regulation of Official Trade Finance: Competition and Collusion in Export Credits and Foreign Aid.” Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.Google Scholar
“Export Credit Still a Race to the Bottom?” Environmental Science & Technology, 1 March 2001, 99 A.Google Scholar
“The Extraterritorial Scope of Nepa's Environmental Impact Statement Requirement.” 1975. Michigan Law Review 74: 349–80.Google Scholar
“Forthcoming Ceq Regulations to Determine Whether Nepa Applies to Environmental Impacts Limited to Foreign Countries.” 1978. Environmental Law Reporter 8: 10111–5.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan A., and David Brown, L., eds. 1998. The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
French, Hilary F. 1998. Investing in the Future: Harnessing Private Capital Flows for Environmentally Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
Ganzi, John, and World Resources Institute. 1998. Leverage for the Environment: A Guide to the Private Financial Services Industry. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Görlach, Benjamin, Knigge, Markus, and Schaper, Marcus. 2007 “Transparency, Information Disclosure and Participation in Export Credit Agencies’ Cover Decisions.” In Participation for Sustainability in Trade, edited by Thoyer, Sophie and Martimort-Asso, Benoît. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gutner, Tamar. 2002. Banking on the Environment: Multilateral Development Banks and Their Environmental Performance in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gutner, Tamar. 2005a. “Explaining the Gaps between Mandate and Performance: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform.” Global Environmental Politics 5 (2): 10–37.Google Scholar
Gutner, Tamar. 2005b. “World Bank Environmental Reform: Revisiting Lessons from Agency Theory.” International Organization 59 (3): 773–83.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haufler, Virginia. “Finance: Actors and Agents of Change.” Paper presented at the ISA Workshop “Finance as Power: The Second Wave.” Philadelphia, PA, 2005.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
King, Andrew A., and Lenox, Michael J. 2000. “Industry Self-Regulation without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 698–716.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 57–85.Google Scholar
Levy, David L. 1997. “Environmental Management as Political Sustainability.” Organization & Environment 10 (2): 126.Google Scholar
Levy, David L., and Egan, Daniel. 1998. “Capital Contests: National and Transnational Channels of Corporate Influence on the Climate Change Negotiations.” Politics & Society 26 (3): 337–61.Google Scholar
Lobe, Jim. 2004. Citigroup Succumbs to ‘Green’ Campaign. Inter Press Service News Agency (IPS), http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=22055. (accessed 21 May, 2004).Google Scholar
Mulder, Herman, Henkel, Kai, Würth, Martin, Géczy, Andrew, Anastassiades, Michel, Greenwald, Steven S., Vabre, Patrice, Jan Prins, Jaap, Wijnen, Bram L., Donlin, Liam, Pecorari, Massimo, Kawamura, Akira, and Cleary, Michael. 2004. Letter of Eleven Equator Banks to James D. Wolfensohn. BankTrack, http://www.banktrack.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/1_EP_documents/Equator_Banks_Letter.pdf. (accessed 21 May, 2004).Google Scholar
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Export-Import Bank of the United States, 9 Environmental Law Reporter 20145 (1979).Google Scholar
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11 Environmental Law Reporter 20266 (1981).Google Scholar
Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J. 2003. “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform.” International Organization 57 (2): 241–76.Google Scholar
Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J. 2005. “Theory, Data, and Hypothesis Testing: World Bank Environmental Reform Redux.” International Organization 59 (3): 785–800.Google Scholar
Nielson, Daniel L., Tierney, Michael J., and Weaver, Catherine E. 2006. “Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide: Re-Engineering the Culture of the World Bank.” Journal of International Relations and Development 9 (2): 107–39.Google Scholar
Norlen, Doug, Cox, Rory, Kim, Miho, and Glazebrook, Catriona. 2002. Unusual Suspects: Unearthing the Shadowy World of Export Credit Agencies. San Francisco: Pacific Environment, ECA Watch.Google Scholar
Park, Susan. 2005. “Norm Diffusion within International Organizations: A Case Study of the World Bank.” Journal of International Relations and Development 8 (2): 111–41.Google Scholar
Park, Susan. 2007. “The World Bank Group: Championing Sustainable Development Norms?” Global Governance 13 (4): 535–56.Google Scholar
Peirce, John C. 1979. “Exports and Environmental Responsibility: Applying Nepa to the Export-Import Bank.” Cornell International Law Review 12: 247–68.Google Scholar
Pincus, Glenn A. 1981. “The “NEPA-Abroad” Controversy: Unresolved by an Executive Order.” Buffalo Law Review 30: 611–62.Google Scholar
Rainforest Action Network. 2004. Second Largest U.S. Bank Sets New Industry Standards on Environment. Rainforest Action Network, http://www.ran.org/ran_campaigns/global_finance/bofa_victory.html. (accessed 21 May, 2001).Google Scholar
Rainforest Action Network, and Citigroup. 2004. RAN: Rainforest Action Network and Citigroup Announce Enhanced Citigroup Environmental Policy - Citigroup Leads Financial Sector on Environmental Issues. Rainforest Action Network, http://www.ran.org/news/newsitem.php?id=886&area=home. (accessed 21 May, 2004).Google Scholar
Reed, David. 1997 “The Environmental Legacy of Bretton Woods: The World Bank.” In Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, edited by Young, Oran R. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
“Renewed Controversy over the International Reach of Nepa.” 1977. Environmental Law Reporter 7: 10205–09.Google Scholar
Rich, Bruce. 1994. “Exporting Destruction.” Environmental Forum 2000, 32–40.Google Scholar
Rich, Bruce. Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, Environmental Impoverishment, and the Crisis of Development. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Schaper, Marcus. 2007a. “Environmental Standards Courtesy of Northern Financial Institutions – Insular Phenomenon or the Future of Standard-Setting in the South?” Paper presented at the Conference “Non-State Actors as Standard Setters: The Erosion of the Public-Private Divide”, 8 February 2007, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Schaper, Marcus. 2007b. “When Implicit Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Become the Norm: NGOs and Environmental Policies in International Finance.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, 1 March 2007, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Lois J. 2004. “The National Environmental Policy Act Today, with an Emphasis on Its Application across U.S. Borders.” Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 14 (2): 325–45.Google Scholar
Schurman, Rachel. 2004. “Fighting Frankenfoods: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe.” Social Problems 51 (2): 243–68.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K., and Prakash, Aseem. 2004. “Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 143–75.Google Scholar
Seymour, Frances. 1998. Go with the Flows? What the Changing Landscape of Development Finance Means for the Public Interest Community. Discussion Draft. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.Google Scholar
Sierra Club v. Coleman, 6 Environmental Law Reporter 20798 (1976).Google Scholar
Sierra Club v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 4 Environmental Law Reporter 20685 (1974).Google Scholar
United States Senate. 1992. Export Enhancement Act of 1992. Report 102-320. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vetterlein, Antje. 2007. Norm Setting or Following: The World Bank and the IMF in Comparison. Colchester: Department of Sociology, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 1997 “Greening the Bank: The Struggle over the Environment, 1970-1995.” In The World Bank: Its First Half Century, edited by Kapur, Devesh, Prior Lewis, John and Charles Webb, Richard. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Walzenbach, G.P.E. 1999 “Export Promotion: Gaining Advantage through Credit and Insurance.” In European Industrial Policy and Competitiveness: Concepts and Instruments, edited by Lawton, Thomas C. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, Catherine E. 2007. “The World's Bank and the Bank's World.” Global Governance 13 (4): 493–512.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Christopher, and Rwabizambuga, Alexis. 2006. “Institutional Pressures, Corporate Reputation, and Voluntary Codes of Conduct: An Examination of the Equator Principles.” Business and Society Review 111 (1): 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar