Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T04:58:50.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cost growth of government revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joshua Semat ,
David Lowery ,
Suzanna Linn  and
William D. Berry
David Lowery
Affiliation:
Political Science, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
Suzanna Linn
Affiliation:
Political Science, Pennsylvania State University, 302 Pond Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA
William D. Berry
Affiliation:
Political Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What accounts for the growing cost of government in the US? [Berry, William D., and David Lowery. 1984. “The Growing Cost of Government: A Test of Two Explanations.” Social Science Quarterly 65 (3): 735–749] tested two explanations for why the costs of goods and services in the public sector have increased faster than these costs in the private sector in the US: “Baumol's Disease” [Baumol, William J. 1967. “Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis.” The American Economic Review 57 (3): 415–426], which focuses on the need for government to match wage increases in the more productive private sector, and [Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1977. “The Expanding Public Sector: Wagner Squared.” Public Choice 31 (1): 147–150] Bureau Voting explanation, which focuses on the voting power of government employees. Berry and Lowery (1984) tested these two explanations using data for the 1947–1979 period and found strong support for the former but little support for the latter. Decades later, a much longer time-series is now available for empirical analysis. Additionally, the character of both public- and private-sector production and the voting power of public employees have changed in ways that may influence the empirical veracity of the two explanations. For these reasons, we extend the original analysis through 2010 to assess whether Baumol's Disease and Bureau Voting continue to have relevance for understanding government cost growth. We find that Baumol's Disease continues to be the better explanation despite changes in both sectors, although public sector wages are now more closely tied to general private rather than manufacturing wages, suggesting that growing production costs may be serving as an increasingly relevant downward pressure on the scope of real government activity.

Type
Research Note
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 723 - 737
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2015 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzia, Sarah F., and Moe, Terry M. 2014. “Public Sector Unions and the Costs of Government.” Journal of Politics (In Press).Google Scholar
Bahrami, Bahman, Bitzan, John D., and Leitch, Jay A. 2009. “Union Worker Wage Effect in the Public Sector.” Journal of Labor Research 30: 35–51.Google Scholar
Bailey, Stephen J., Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko, and Valkama, Pekka. 2014. “Application of Baumol's Cost Disease to Public Sector Services: Conceptual, Theoretical and Empirical Falsities.” Public Management Review 1–19. [ahead of print].Google Scholar
Bates, Laurie J., and Santerre, Rexford E. 2013a. “Does U.S. Health Care Sector Suffer from Baumol's Cost Disease? Evidence from the 50 States.” Journal of Health Economics 32: 386–391.Google Scholar
Bates, Laurie J., and Santerre, Rexford E. 2013b. “Is the U.S. Private Education Sector Infected by Baumol's Cost Disease? Evidence from the 50 States.” Munich Personal RePec Archive. Accessed March 28, 2015. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/52300.Google Scholar
Bates, Laurie J., and Santerre, Rexford E. 2015. “Does Baumol's Cost Disease Account for Nonfederal Public-Sector Cost Growth in the United States? A New Test of an Old Idea.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (1): 251–260.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. 1967. “Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis.” The American Economic Review 57 (3): 415–426.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. 1993. “Social Wants and Dismal Science: The Curious Case of the Climbing Costs of Health and Teaching.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 137 (3): 612–637.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. 2012. The Cost Disease: Why Computers Get Cheaper and Health Care Doesn't. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J., Anne Batey Blackman, Sue, and Wolff, Edward N. 1985. “Unbalanced Growth Revisited: Asymptotic Stagnancy and New Evidence.” The American Economic Review 75 (4): 806–817.Google Scholar
Beck, Morris. 1976. “The Expanding Public Sector: Some Contrary Evidence.” National Tax Journal 29 (1): 15–21.Google Scholar
Beck, Morris. 1979. “Public Sector Growth: A Real Perspective.” Public Finance = Finances Publiques 34 (3): 313–356.Google Scholar
Bel, Germà, Fageda, Xavier, Warner, and Mildred E. 2010. “Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper than Public Production? A Meta-Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (3): 553–577.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., and Lowery, David. 1984. “The Growing Cost of Government: A Test of Two Explanations.” Social Science Quarterly 65 (3): 735–749.Google Scholar
Blais, André, and Dion, Stéphane. 1991. The Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat: Appraisals and Evidence. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Blake, Donald E., and Dion, Stéphane. 1990. “The Public/Private Sector Cleavage in North America: The Political Behavior and Attitudes of Public Sector Employees.” Comparative Political Studies 23 (3): 381–403.Google Scholar
Borcherding, Thomas E. 1977. “The Sources of Growth of Public Expenditures in the United States, 1902–1970.” In Budgets and Bureaucrats, edited by Borcherding, Thomas E., 45–70. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Barry, Perry, George L., and Shapiro, Matthew D. 1994. “Productivity and Real Wages: Is There a Puzzle?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 317–344. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Bradford, David F., Malt, Richard A., and Oates, Wallace E. 1969. “The Rising Cost of Local Public Services: Some Evidence and Reflections.” National Tax Journal 22 (2): 185–202.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. 1977. “The Expanding Public Sector: Wagner Squared.” Public Choice 31 (1): 147–150.Google Scholar
Budd, John W., and Na, In-Gang. 2000. “The Union Membership Wage Premium for Employees Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements.” Journal of Labor Economics 18 (4): 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Winston C., and Denzau, Arthur T. 1977. “The Voting Behavior of Bureaucrats and Public Sector Growth.” In Budgets and Bureaucrats, edited by Borcherding, Thomas, 90–99. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Card, David, Lemieux, Thomas, and Craig Riddell, W. 2003. “Unionization and Wage Inequality: A Comparative Study of the US, the UK, and Canada.” NBER Working Paper No. 9473.Google Scholar
Cobet, Aaron E., and Wilson, Gregory A. 2002. “Comparing 50 Years of Labor Productivity in U.S. and Foreign Manufacturing.” Monthly Labor Review 125 (6): 51–65.Google Scholar
Colombier, Carsten. 2010. “Drivers of Health Care Expenditures: Does Baumol's Cost Disease Loom Large?” Paper presented at the 66th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Corey, Elizabeth C., and Garand, James C. 2002. “Are Government Employees More Likely to Vote?: An Analysis of Turnout in the 1996 U.S. National Election.” Public Choice 111 (3–4): 259–283.Google Scholar
Domberger, Simon, and Piggott, John. 1986. “Privatization Policies and Public Enterprise: A Survey.” Economic Record 62 (2): 145–162.Google Scholar
Ferris, J. Stephen, and West, Edwin G. 1999. “The Cost Disease and Government Growth: Qualifications to Baumol.” Public Choice 89 (1–2): 35–52.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B. 1988. “Contraction and Expansion: the Divergence of Private Sector and Public Sector Unionism in the United States.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (2): 63–88.Google Scholar
Gallouj, Faız. 2002. “Innovation in Services and the Attendant Old and New Myths.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (2): 137–154.Google Scholar
Garand, James C., Parkhurst, Catherine T., and Seoud, Rusanne Jourdan. 1991. “Bureaucrats, Policy Attitudes, and Political Behavior: Extension of the Bureau Voting Model of Government Growth.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1 (2): 177–212.Google Scholar
Garrett, Thomas A., and Rhine, Russell M. 2006. “On the Size and Growth of Government.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 88 (January/February 2006).Google Scholar
Gramlich, Edward M., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. 1982. “Voting on Public Spending: Differences Between Public Employees, Transfer Recipients, and Private Workers.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1 (4): 516–533.Google Scholar
Hartwig, Jochen. 2008. “What Drives Health Care Expenditure? Baumol's Model of Unbalanced Growth Revisited.” Journal of Health Economics 27: 603–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskel, Jonathan, Lawrence, Robert Z., Leamer, Edward E., and Slaughter, Matthew J. 2012. “Globalization and U.S. Wages: Modifying Classic Theory to Explain Recent Facts.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (2): 119–139.Google Scholar
Heller, Peter S. 1981. “Diverging Trends in the Shares of Nominal and Real Government Expenditure in GDP: Implications for Policy.” National Tax Journal 34 (1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Graeme. 1998. “Contracting Public Sector Services: A Meta-Analytic Perspective of the International Evidence.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 57 (4): 98–110.Google Scholar
Imbeau, Louis M., Petry, François, Crete, Jean, Tellier, Genevieve, and Clavet, Michel. 2001. “Measuring Government Growth in the Canadian Provinces: Decomposing Real Growth and Deflator Effects.” Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de politiques 27 (1): 39–52.Google Scholar
Johnston, Louis D. 2012. “History Lessons: Understanding the Decline in Manufacturing.” Minnpost. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.minnpost.com/macro-micro-minnesota/2012/02/history-lessons-understanding-decline-manufacturing#sourcenote.Google Scholar
Kau, James B., and Rubin, Paul H. 1981. “The Size of Government.” Public Choice 37 (2): 261–274.Google Scholar
Larkey, Patrick D., Stolp, Chandler, and Winer, Mark. 1981. “Theorizing About the Growth of Government: A Research Assessment.” Journal of Public Policy 1 (2): 157–220.Google Scholar
Lee, Marlene, and Mather, Mark. 2008. US Labor Force Trends. 63 (2). Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Levy, Frank, and Kochan, Thomas. 2012. “Addressing the Problem of Stagnant Wages.” Comparative Economic Studies 54 (4): 739–764.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Berry, William D. 1983. “The Growth of Government in the United States: An Empirical Assessment of Competing Explanations.” American Journal of Political Science 27 (4): 665–694.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. Jr., 2006. Public Management: Old and New. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marlow, Michael L., and Orzechowski, William. 1996. “Public Sector Unions and Public Spending.” Public Choice 89 (1–2): 1–16.Google Scholar
Mayer, Gerald. 2004. Union Membership Trends in the United States. Ithaca, New York: ILR School, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary J., and Moe, Terry M. 1983. “Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government.” The American Political Science Review 77 (2): 297–322.Google Scholar
Neck, Reinhard, and Getzner, Michael. 2007. “Austrian Government Expenditures” Wagner's Law or Baumol's Disease.” International Business and Economics Research Journal 6 (11): 49–66.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A. 1974. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William. D. 2006. “Baumol's Disease: A Macroeconomic Perspective.” NBER Working Paper 12218.Google Scholar
Orzechowski, William Paul. 1974. “Labor Intensity, Productivity, and the Growth of the Federal Sector.” Public Choice 19 (1): 123–126.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, and Bouckaert, Geert. 1999. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, and Dan, Sorin. 2011. “The Impacts of the New Public Management in Europe: A Meta-Analysis.” Working Paper. Leuven, Belgium: Public Governance Institute, KU-Leuven.Google Scholar
Spann, Robert M. 1977a. “The Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth and the Expanding Public Sector: Some Simple Tests of a Model of Government Growth.” Journal of Public Economics 8 (3): 397–404.Google Scholar
Spann, Robert M. 1977b. “Public versus Private Provision of Governmental Services.” In Budgets and Bureaucrats, edited by Borcherding, Thomas E., 100–129. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Triplett, Jack E., and Bosworth, Barry. 2003. “Productivity Measurement Issues in Services Industries: Baumol's Disease has been Cured.” Economic Policy Review 9 (3): 23–33.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1977. “What is to be Done?” In Budgets and Bureaucrats, edited by Borcherding, Thomas E., 275–288. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
US. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014a. All Employees: Government [USGOVT]. Retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Accessed November 23, 2014. https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/USGOVT/.Google Scholar
US. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014b. All Employees: Total nonfarm [PAYEMS], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Accessed March 28, 2015. https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PAYEMS/.Google Scholar
US. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014c. “Union Members – 2013.” Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf.Google Scholar
Weiher, Kenneth, and Beladi, Hamid. 2011. “Globalization and Wage Stagnation: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 18 (2): 201–211.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce, and Rosenfeld, Jake. 2011. “Unions, Norms, and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality.” American Sociological Review 76 (4): 513–537.Google Scholar