Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T16:22:24.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varieties of Capitalism and the Auto Industry's Environmental Initiatives: National Institutional Explanations for Firms' Motivations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John J. Mikler
John J. Mikler*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The auto industry is usually considered to be a global industry. Yet the majority of passenger cars are still manufactured and sold in industrialised states where its largest firms are headquartered. The central claim made is that despite the auto industry being comprised of multinational corporations, there are clear national differences in the motivations firms cite for environmental initiatives. US firms are more focused on traditional material factors, especially market forces. However, German and Japanese firms are more focused on social concerns and internally-driven strategies. They have more normative, non-market rationales for their environmental initiatives. By analysing what firms themselves say motivates them to improve the environmental performance of their products, via a qualitative analysis of recent environmental reports by German, US and Japanese firms, as well as interviews conducted with key personnel, the conclusion reached is as follows. While the question of ‘greenwashing’ versus real commitment to reduce the environmental impact of the industry's products remains relevant, the institutional basis of capitalist relations in their home state (i.e. their home state's variety of capitalism) suggests different nationally appropriate and conducive paths to environmental commitments.

Keywords

multinational corporationsenvironmentvarieties of capitalisminstitutionsauto industry
Type
Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2007 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACEA. No date a. New Passenger Car Registrations in W.Europe, Breakdown by Specifications: Average Cubic Capacity. http://www.acea.be/ACEA/Average_CC-PC-90-02.pdf, accessed 9 June 2004.Google Scholar
ACEA. No date b. Passenger Cars in EU15: Breakdown by Segments and Bodies. http://www.acea.be/ACEA/Segment-Bodies.pdf, accessed 9 June 2004.Google Scholar
Austin, D., Rosinki, N., Sauer, A. and le Duc, C. 2003. Changing Drivers: the Impact of Climate Change on Competitiveness and Value Creation in the Automotive Industry. Sustainable Asset Management and World Resources Institute. http://pdf.wri.org/changing_drivers_full_report.pdf, accessed 10 January 2004.Google Scholar
Berger, S. 1996. “Introduction”. In Berger, S. and Dore, R. (Eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
BMW Group. 2003. Sustainable Value Report 2003/2004: Innovation. Efficiency. Responsibility. Munich: Bayerischen Motoren Werke.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. 1996. “The Convergence Hypothesis Revisited: Globalisation but Still the Century of Nations?”. In Berger, S. and Dore, R. (Eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, L.D., McCormick, J., Byron, J., and Borroni-Bird, C.E., 2002. “Vehicle of Change”. Scientific American, 287: 4, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CCFA. 2003. Analysis and Statistics, Paris: CCFA, http://www.ccfa.fr/pdf/2003eng.pdf, accessed 10 January 2004.Google Scholar
Coates, D. 2005. Paradigms of Explanation. In Coates, D. (Ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, G.T., and Amawi, A. 1997. “Classical Liberalism”. In Crane, G.T., and Amawi, A. (Eds.). The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DaimlerChrysler. 2004. 360 Degrees: Environmental Report 2004: Alliances for the Environment. Stuttgart: DaimlerChrysler Communications.Google Scholar
Delmas, M., and Marcus, A. 2004. “Firms’ Choice of Regulatory Instruments to Reduce Pollution: a Transaction Cost Approach”. Business and Politics, 6: 3, Article 3.Google Scholar
Deutsche Bank. 2002. The Drivers: How to Navigate the Auto Industry. Deutsche Bank AG.Google Scholar
Deutsche Bank. 2004. The Drivers: How to Navigate the Auto Industry. Deutsche Bank AG.Google Scholar
Dicken, P. 1998. Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy. 3rd edition. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Dore, R. 2000. Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism: Japan and Germany versus the Anglo Saxons. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dore, R., Lazonick, W., and O'sullivan, M. 1999. “Varieties of Capitalism in the Twentieth Century”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15: 4, 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doremus, P.N., Keller, W.W., Pauly, L.W., and Reich, S. 1999. The Myth of the Global Corporation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ford Motor Company. 2004. 2003/4 Corporate Citizenship Report: Our Principles, Progress and Performance: Connecting with Society. Dearborn: Ford Motor Company.Google Scholar
Freund, P., and Martin, G. 1993. The Ecology of the Automobile. Montreal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
General Motors Corporation. 2004. 2004 Corporate Responsibility Report. Detroit: General Motors Corporation.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., and Keohane, R. 1993. “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework”. In Goldstein, J., and Keohane, R. (Eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Green, D.P. and Shapiro, I. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A., and Soskice, D. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism”. In Hall, P.A., and Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampden-Turner, C. and Trompenaars, A. 1993. The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands. New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., and Rittberg, V. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawken, P., Lovins, A. and Lovins, H. 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. New York: Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Hay, C. 2006. “Globalisation and Public Policy”. In Rhodes, R., Binder, S. and Rockman, B. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helleiner, E. 2003. “Economic Liberalism and its Critics: The Past as Prologue”. Review of International Political Economy. 10: 4, 685–696.Google Scholar
Hellman, K., and Heavenrich, R. 2004. Light Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2004. United States Environment Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/mpg/fetrends/420r04001.pdf, accessed 13 May 2004.Google Scholar
Hirst, P., and Thompson, G. 1997. “Globalisation in Question: International Economic Relations and Forms of Public Governance”. In Hollingsworth, J.R., and Boyer, R. (Eds.), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honda Motor Company. 2002. Honda Ecology. Tokyo: Honda Motor Company.Google Scholar
Honda Motor Company. 2004. Honda Environmental Annual Report 2004. Tokyo: Honda Motor Company.Google Scholar
IEA. 1993. Cars and Climate Change. Paris: OECD Google Scholar
Jain, J. and Guiver, J. 2001. “Turning the Car Inside Out: Transport, Equity and Environment”. Social Policy and Administration, 35: 5, 569–586.Google Scholar
JAMA. 2003. 2003: The Motor Industry of Japan.Google Scholar
http://www.jama.or.jp/eng/pdf/MIJ2003.pdf, accessed 18 January 2004.Google Scholar
JAMA. 2004a. Motor Vehicle Statistics of Japan 2004. Tokyo: JAMA.Google Scholar
JAMA. 2004b. 2004: The Motor Industry of Japan. Tokyo: JAMA.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P.J. 1996. Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, D.L., and Kolk, A. 2002. “Strategic Responses to Global Climate Change: Conflicting Pressures on Multinationals in the Oil Industry”. Business and Politics, 4: 3, Article 2.Google Scholar
Levy, D.L., and Prakash, A. 2003. “Bargains Old and New: Multinational Corporations in Global Governance”. Business and Politics, 5: 2, Article 1.Google Scholar
March, J.G., and Olsen, J.P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press Google Scholar
March, J.G., and Olsen, J.P. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders”. International Organization, 52: 4, 943–969.Google Scholar
Maxton, G.P., and Wormald, J. 2004. Time for a Model Change: Re-engineering the Global Automotive Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mikler, J. 2005. Institutional Reasons for the Effect of Environmental Regulations: Passenger Car CO2 Emissions in the EU, US and Japan, Global Society, 19: 4, 409–444.Google Scholar
Newell, P., and Paterson, M. 1998. “A Climate for Business: Global Warming: The State and Capital”, Review of International Political Economy, 5: 4, 679–703.Google Scholar
NHTSA. 2003. Automotive Fuel Economy Program Annual Update Calendar Year 2002. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/CAFE/FuelEconUpdates/2002/2002AnnualUpdate.pdf, accessed 15 January 2004.Google Scholar
Nissan Motor Company. 2004a. Environmental Report 2004. Tokyo: Nissan Motor Company.Google Scholar
Nissan Motor Company. 2004b. Sustainability Report 2004. Tokyo: Nissan Motor Company.Google Scholar
No author. 2005. “The $10 Billion Man”, The Economist, 26 February-4 March, 62.Google Scholar
North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 2004. Can Cars Come Clean? Strategies for Low-Emission Vehicles. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OICA. 2004. The World's Automotive Industry: Some Key Figures. http://www.oica.net/htdocs/Main.htm, accessed 13 January 2006.Google Scholar
OICA. 2005. Motor Vehicle Production by Manufacturer: World Ranking 2004. http://www.oica.net/htdocs/Main.htm, accessed 13 January 2006.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, P.C. 1993. “The Development of Contemporary Political Theory”. In Barnett, W.A., Hinich, M.J., and Schofield, N.J. (Eds.), Political Economy: Institutions, Competition and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. 2000. “Car Culture and Global Environmental Politics”. Review of International Studies, 26: 2, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, L.W., and Reich, S. 1997. “National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behavior: Enduring Differences in the Age of Globalisation”. International Organization, 51: 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
Productivity Commission. 2002. Review of Automotive Assistance. Inquiry Report. Report No.25. Melbourne: Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
Renault. 2001. 2000 Annual Report Summary. Boulogne Billancourt: Renault. http://www.renault.com/docs/finance_gb/synthese_2000_gb.pdf, accessed 17 January 2006.Google Scholar
Rugman, A.M. 2005. The Regional Multinationals: MNEs and “Global” Strategic Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2002. Pocket World in Figures 2003 Edition. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
0 Toyota Motor Corporation. 2004. Environmental and Social Report 2004. Tokyo: Toyota Motor Corporation.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. 2006. World Investment Report 2006. New York and Geneva: United Nations UNEP. 2003. Transport. http://www.uneptie.org/energy/act/tp/index.htm, accessed 26 May 2003.Google Scholar
UNEP and ACEA. 2002. Industry as a Partner for Sustainable Development: Automotive. http://www.uneptie.org/outreach/wssd/docs/sectors/final/automotive.pdf, accessed 14 May 2003.Google Scholar
VDA. No date. Fuel Consumption.Google Scholar
http://www.vda.de/en/aktuell/kraftstoffverbrauch/marktgewichtet.html, accessed 29 July 29 2005.Google Scholar
VDA. 2003. Annual Report 2003. Frankfurt: VDA,Google Scholar
http://www.vda.de/en/service/jahresbericht/files/VDA_2003_EN.pdf. accessed 17 March 2004.Google Scholar
Vitols, S. 2001. “Varieties of Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and the UK”. In Hall, P.A., and Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vlasic, B., and Stertz, B.A. 2001. Taken for a Ride: How Daimler-Benz Drove Off with Chrysler. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Volkswagen, AG. 2003. Environmental Report 2003/2004: Partners in Sustainability. Wolfsburg: Volkswagen AG.Google Scholar
WBCSD. 2004. Mobility 2030: Meeting the Challenges of Sustainability. Geneva: WBCSD.Google Scholar