Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:04:14.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate Moral Responsibility: When it Might Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Michael J. Phillips
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The debate over corporate moral responsibility has become a fixture in business ethics research and teaching. Only rarely, however, does the sizable literature on that question consider whether the debate has important practical implications. This article examines that question from a corporate control perspective. After assuming corporate moral responsibility’s existence for purposes of argument, the article concludes that such responsibility makes a difference in cases where it is present but personal responsibility is absent. Then the article tries to identify the forces that diminish personal responsibility when corporate responsibility exists. The most important such forces, it concludes, spring from the socialization processes people undergo when they enter groups. One example is the well-known phenomenon of groupthink, which can exculpate individuals by rendering them justifiably ignorant of foreseeable risks of harm.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1995 , pp. 555 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Curtler, Hugh (ed.): 1986, Shame, Responsibility, and the Corporation (New York: Haven Publications).Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent: 1977, “The Social Policy of Corporate Criminal Responsibility,” Adelaide Law Review, vol. 6, pp. 361–412.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent: 1983, “Reconstructing Corporate Criminal Law: Deterrence, Retribution, Fault, and Sanctions,” Southern California Law Review, vol. 56, pp. 1141–1246.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent & Braithwaite, John: 1988, “The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism, and Accountability,” Sydney Law Review, vol. 11, pp. 468–513.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent & French, Peter A. (eds.): 1985, Corrigible Corporations and Unruly Law (San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press).Google Scholar
Flores, Albert & Johnson, Deborah G.: 1983, “Collective Responsibility and Professional Roles,” Ethics, vol. 93, pp. 537–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Peter A.: 1979, “The Corporation as a Moral Person,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 16, pp. 207–15.Google Scholar
French, Peter A.: 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Garrett, Jan Edward: 1989, “Unredistributable Corporate Moral Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 8, pp. 535–45.Google Scholar
May, Larry: 1987, The Morality of Groups (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
May, Larry & Hoffman, Stacey (eds.): 1991, Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics (Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.).Google Scholar
Metzger, Michael B.: 1984, “Corporate Criminal Liability for Defective Products: Policies, Problems, and Prospects,” Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 73, pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael J.: 1992, “Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation,” Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 2, pp. 435–59.Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul B.: 1986, “Collective Responsibility and Professional Roles,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 5, pp. 151–54.Google Scholar
Walsh, W. H.: 1970: “Pride, Shame, and Responsibility,” Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 20, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H.: 1985, Persons, Rights, and Corporations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.).Google Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H.: 1989, “Corporate and Individual Moral Responsibility: A Reply to Jan Garrett,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 8, pp. 821–22.Google Scholar