Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:18:44.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Commons on Customer Goodwill and the Economic Value of Business Ethics: Response to Professor Sen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Robert Black
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper shows how John R. Commons’ analysis of a firm’s goodwill value gives analytical support to Professor Amartya Sen’s contention (BEQ, 1993) that business ethics makes economic sense. A firm’s market value consists of the value of both tangible and intangible capital, including the goodwill value of ongoing customer relations. If a firm is to defend its goodwill value, it needs to have the protection of the courts and to pursue ethical practices. The courts defend fair competition by giving protection from unethical competitors while the firm defends its reputation with honest dealings.

By implication, firms which depend on ongoing customer relations will tend to engage in more ethical business practices than firms which do not. Even a firm which makes a mistake that compromises its product’s safety may reduce the loss of goodwill value over time by admitting the mistake early rather than hiding it.

Also by implication, the transition from a command socialist economy to a market economy cannot be made instantaneously since trust, reputation, and these ongoing customer relations—key institutions of market economies—cannot be generated instantaneously.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 359 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, R. A. “Henry Sidgwick and the Institutionalists on the Goodwill Value of the Firm,” History of Political Economy, 24:1 (Spring 1992): 79–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commons, J. R.Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan (1924).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R.Institutional Economics. New York: Macmillan (1936).Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald. “Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism,” British Journal of Sociology, 34 (1983).Google Scholar
Endres, Anthony. “Veblen and Commons on Goodwill: A Case of Theoretical Divergence,” History of Political Economy, 17: 4 (Winter 1985): 637–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Kevin. “How Did Sears Blow This Gasket?” Business Week, (June 29, 1992): 38.Google Scholar
Hayes, Robert H., and Abernathy, William J., “Managing Our Way to Economic Decline,” Harvard Business Review, (1980); reprinted in Mansfield, Edwin, ed., Managerial Economics and Operations Research: Techniques, Applications, and Cases, fifth ed., (New York: Norton, 1987): 3–25.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir I. “The Export of Capital,” Imperialism: The Highest State of Capitalism. New York: International Publishers (1939); reprinted in Crane, George T. and Amawi, Abla, eds. The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy. New York: Oxford University Press (1991): 98–100.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics, 8th ed. 1920. Reprinted in New York: MacMillan, 1953.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart Mill. Principles of Political Economy, 5th ed. New York: D. Appleton (1880).Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. “Does Business Ethics Make Economic Sense?” Business Ethics Quarterly, 3:1 (January 1993), pp. 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. Principles of Political Economy. London (1883).Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London (1776); reprinted by Penguin Books (1986).Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. The Place of Science in Modern Civilization. New York: B. W. Huebsch, 1919.Google Scholar
Wellisz, Stanislaw. “Lessons of Economic Reform.” Journal of International Affairs, 45: 1 (Summer 1991): 165–179.Google Scholar