Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-09-02T01:32:55.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Management Ethics without the Past: Rationalism and Individualism in Critical Organization Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

Since the Enlightenment our attachment to the past has been greatly weakened, in some areas of social life it has almost ceased to exist. This characteristic of the modern mind is seen as an overreaction. The modern mind has lost the capacity to appreciate the positive contribution the maintenance of the past in the present achieves in social life, especially in the sphere of moral conduct.

In the field of organization theory, nowhere is the past as explicitly distrusted as in critical organization theory. The maintenance of the past in the present is seen as a potential carrier of oppressive and unjust social relationships. Perpetual critique is advocated as a means to uncover these oppressive and unjust relations and prevent any new undemocratic relations from becoming established.

I present an historical and cultural analysis of the modern attitude toward the past and develop a concept of moral tradition to analyze critical organization theory’s ethical assumptions and implications. In so doing, an effort is made to rectify the exaggerated confidence critical organization theory places in rationalism and individualism and to recognize the ineluctable role traditions play not only in organizational life, but also in the way we theorize about organizations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. 1996. Critical theory and postmodernism: approaches to organizational studies. In Handbook of organization studies, ed. Clegg, S. and Hardy, C., pp. 191217. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Willmot, H. 1992a. Critical management studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Willmot, H. 1992b. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review 17: 432464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. 1950. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1968. Between past and future. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benson, J. 1977. Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyatzis, R. 1995. Innovation in professional education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Burke, E. 1795; 1967. The philosophy of Edmund Burke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, G. 1994. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 4: The contribution of Jürgen Habermas. Organization Studies 15: 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. 1977. Power, organization theory, Marx and critique. In Critical Issues in Organizations, ed. Clegg, S. and Dunkerly, D., pp. 240. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. and Dunkerley, D. 1977. Critical Issues in Organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deetz, S. 1992. Disciplinary power in the modern corporation. In Critical management studies, ed. Alvesson, M. and Willmot, H., pp. 2145. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Deetz, S. and Mumby, D. 1990. Power, discourse and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical tradition in communication studies in organization. In Communication Yearbook 13, ed. Anderson, J., pp. 1847. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1986. Essays on individualism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. 1932. The sacred wood. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Forester, J. 1992. Critical ethnography: On fieldwork in a Habermasian way. In Alvesson, and Willmot, 1992a, pp. 4665.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1992. Reason and culture. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1971. Toward a rational society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1979. Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action, vol. I: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, D. and Cohen, L. 1992. “Scandal is fading away for Solomon, but not for trader Paul Mozer,” Wall Street Journal, August, 7.Google Scholar
Heydebrand, W. 1977. Organizational contradictions in public bureaucracies: Toward a Marxian theory of organizations. The Sociological Quarterly 18: 83107.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1651; 1968. Leviathan. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Jackall, R. 1988. Moral mazes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jermier, J. 1985. “When the sleeper wakes: A short story extending themes in radical organization theory. Journal of Management 11: 6780.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kunda, G. 1992. Engineering culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Luke, S. 1973. Individualism. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1988. Whose justice? Whose rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1850; 1963. Early writings. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. 1993. Ideals and illusions. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, C. and Fritsch, P. 1996. Exxon defends its “novel” approach to reducing Valdez punitive damages. Wall Street Journal, June 14.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1831; 1962. Essays on politics and culture. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mingers, J. 1992. Technical, practical, and critical OR—past, present, and future. In Alvesson, and Willmot, 1992a, pp. 90112.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 1992. Marketing discourse and practice: Towards a critical analysis. In Alvesson, and Willmot, 1992a, pp. 136158.Google Scholar
Nord, W. and Jermier, J. 1992. Critical social science for managers? Promising and perverse possibilities. In Alvesson, and Willmot, 1992a, pp. 202221.Google Scholar
Plato. Laws. 1988. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1969. Knowing and being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rieff, P. 1985. Fellow teachers: Of culture and its second death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rieff, P. 1987. The triumph of the therapeutic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rieff, P. 1990. The feeling intellect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. 1755; 1992. Discourse on the origin of inequality. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Shils, E. 1981. Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steffy, B. and Grimes, A. 1992. Personnel/organization psychology: A critique of the disicpline. In Alvesson, and Willmot, 1992a, pp. 181201.Google Scholar
Sullivan, H. S. 1950. The illusion of personal individuality. Psychiatry 13: 317332.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. 1848; 1969. Democracy in America. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. and Nelson, K. 1995. Managing business ethics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1904; 1958. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1946. Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Willmot, H. 1993. Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies 30: 515552.Google Scholar
Wolfe, T. 1987. Bonfire of the vanities. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar