Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:00:43.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Corporations in Shaping the Global Rules of the Game: In Search of New Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

J. (Hans) van Oosterhout
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Although a research focus on the increasing involvement of corporations in shaping and maintaining the global rules of the game points out promising avenues for future research, it simultaneously makes clear how little currently established, mostly managerial conceptual frameworks have to offer in making sense of these developments. It is argued that we need to expand the rather restricted perspectives that these frameworks provide, in order to explore new conceptual foundations that will not only enable us to travel the confines of the different disciplines involved with the study of the changing role of business in shaping the global rules of the game, but that can also systematically connect normative and positive research questions at the conceptual level. Three directions for this search for new foundations are briefly explored.

Type
Responses to BEQ’s Special Issue on the Changing Role of Business in Global Society
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 253 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, K. W., and Snidal, D. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization 54(3): 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., and Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2004. “Codes of Good Governance Worldwide: What Is the Trigger?” Organization Studies 25(3): 415–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, M. 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberger, K. A. 2006. “Regulation as Delegation: Private Firms, Decisionmaking, and Accountability in the Administrative State,” Duke Law Journal 56(2): 377–468.Google Scholar
Bartley, T. 2007. “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions,” American Journal of Sociology 113(2): 297–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. 1992. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 1982. Enforced Self-Regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control. Michigan Law Review 80: 1466–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. 1990. “The Domain of Constitutional Economics.” Constitutional Political Economy 1(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G., and Melamed, A. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” Harvard Law Review 85(6): 1089–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashore, B. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority,” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 15(4): 503–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C. 2006. Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. C. 2001. “Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy.” Review of International Studies 27(2): 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. C. 2003. Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., and den Hond, F. 2005. “A Bibliometrical Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance,” Business & Society 44(3): 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D. K., and McConnell, J. J. 2003. “International Corporate Governance,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elms, H., and Phillips, R. A. 2009. “Private Security Companies and Institutional Legitimacy: Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility,” Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3): 403–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Hardy, C., and Maguire, S. 2007. “Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue,” Organization Studies 28(7): 957–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., and Suddaby, R. 2006. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms,” Academy of Management Journal 49(1): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. B., and Biersteker, T. J. 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D., and McGrew, A. G. 2002. Governing Globalization: Power, Authority, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., and Lander, M. W. 2009. “Structure! Agency! (and Other Quarrels): A Meta-Analysis of Institutional Theories of Organization,” Academy of Management Journal 52(1): 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, N. H. 2009. “Does Global Business Have a Responsibility to Promote Just Institutions?” Business Ethics Quarterly 19(2): 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L., and Shavell, S. 2001. “Fairness versus Welfare,” Harvard Law Review 114(4): 961–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. 2005. Pure Theory of Law. Clark N.J.: Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar
King, M. R., and Sinclair, T. J. 2003. “Private Actors and Public Policy: A Requiem for the New Basel Capital Accord,” International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science pol 24(3): 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. 2009. “Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility: Transnational Politics, Transnational Firms, and Human Rights,” Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3): 349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, W. S. 2003. “Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing,” Journal of Business Ethics 43(3): 253–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E. P. 2000. “Economic Imperialism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(1): 99–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N., and Weinberger, O. 1986. An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matten, D., and Crane, A. 2005. “Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization,” Academy of Management Review 30(1): 166–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolke, A. 2006. “Introduction to the Special Issue: The Globalization of Accounting Standards,” Business and Politics 7(3): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazzo, G., and Scherer, A. G. 2006. “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework,” Journal of Business Ethics 66(1): 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism.” London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. A. 1997. “Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness,” Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pies, I., Hielscher, S., and Beckmann, M. 2009. “Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship,” Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3): 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, T. 2005. “Private Authority, Technical Authority, and the Globalization of Accounting Standards,” Business and Politics 7(3): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. J. 1993. “Professional Innovation: Corporate Lawyers and Private Lawmaking,” Law and Social Inquiry: Journal of the American Bar Foundation 18(3): 423–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics,” American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., and Palazzo, G. 2007. “Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective,” Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., and Baumann, D. 2006. “Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance,” Business Ethics Quarterly 16(4): 505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., and Matten, D. 2009. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities,” Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3): 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spar, D. L. 1999. “Lost in (Cyber) Space: The Private Rules of Online Commerce,” in Private Authority in International Affairs, ed. Claire Cutler, A., Porter, Tony, and Haufler, Virginia. Albany: SUNY Press, 31–52.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review 20: 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R., Cooper, D. J., and Greenwood, R. 2007. “Transnational Regulation of Professional Services: Governance Dynamics of Field Level Organizational Change,” Accounting Organizations and Society 32(4–5): 333–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2005. “Private Authority and Transnational Governance: The Contours of the International System of Investor Protection,” Review of International Political Economy 12(4): 600–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oosterhout, J. 2005. “Corporate Citizenship: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Yet Come,” Academy of Management Review 30(4): 677–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oosterhout, J. 2007. “Authority and Democracy in Corporate Governance?” Journal of Business Ethics 71(4): 359–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oosterhout, J. 2008. “Transcending the Confines of Economic and Political Organization? The Misguided Metaphor of Corporate Citizenship,” Business Ethics Quarterly 18(1): 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oosterhout, J., and Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. 2008. “Much Ado about Nothing; A Conceptual Critique of Corporate Social Responsibility,” in The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. Crane, A.McWilliams, A.Matten, D., and Moon, J.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197–223.Google Scholar
Van Oosterhout, J., and Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. 2009. “Extant Social Contracts in Global Business Regulation: Outline of a Research Agenda,” Journal of Business Ethics 88: 729–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D. 2008. “Private Global Business Regulation,” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., and Cochran, P. L. 1999. “Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices,” Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1991. “Comparative Economic-Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2): 269–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1999. “Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective,” Journal of Law Economics & Organization 15(1): 306–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zingales, L. 1998. “Corporate Governance,” in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, ed. Newman, P.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar