Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T16:36:06.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems and Challenges in Teaching Business History in Professional Education for Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

John G. B. Hutchins
John G. B. Hutchins
Affiliation:
School of Business and Public Administration, Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Business history as a differentiated subject is of comparatively recent origin in the American academic scene. It has naturally been most closely associated with collegiate schools of business, and particularly with those offering graduate or semi-graduate programs of instruction. It now seems appropriate to inquire what rôle it plays in such programs, what should be its content, how it should be presented, and what relationship it has to the closely associated fields of economic history, economics, business administration, and public administration

Type
Problems and Challenges in Teaching Business
Information
Business History Review , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 1950 , pp. 146 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Editor's Note: This paper was read at the joint meeting of the Business Historical Society, Inc., and the American Historical Association in Boston, December 29, 1949.

1 Gras, N. S. B., “Are You Writing a Business History?”, Bulletin of the Business Historical Society, vol. xviii, no. 4 (October, 1944), p. 73.Google Scholar

2 E. E. Day, “Social Responsibilities of Business Education,” Convocation address commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the establishment of the School of Business Administration, University of Michigan, October 5, 1949, p. 6.

3 Usher, Abbott P., “The Significance of Modern Empiricism for History and Economics,” Journal of Economic History, vol. ix, no. 2 (November, 1949), pp. 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Ibid., passim.

5 Gras, N. S. B., Business and Capitalism (New York, 1939).Google Scholar

6 Usher, op. cit., p. 151; also A History of Mechanical Inventions (New York, 1929), Chap. ii.

7 Earle, Edward Meade, Makers of Modern Strategy (Princeton, N. J., 1943), p. 179.Google Scholar

8 Lane, Frederick C., Andrea Barbarigo, Merchant of Venice, 1418–1449, Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Politicial Science, Ser. lxii, no. 1 (Baltimore, 1944).Google Scholar

9 De Roover, Raymond, The Medici Bank (New York, 1948).Google Scholar

10 Baxter, William T., The House of Hancock (Cambridge, 1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Porter, Kenneth W., The Jacksons and the Lees: Two Generations of Massachusetts Merchants, 1765–1844, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Porter, Kenneth W., Astor, John Jacob, Business Man, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1931).Google Scholar

13 Gras, N. S. B. and Larson, H. M., Casebook in American Business History (New York, 1939), cases xxvi, xxvii.Google Scholar

14 Knowlton, Evelyn H., Pepperell's Progress (Cambridge, 1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Scoville, Warren C., Revolution in Glass Making (Cambridge, 1948).Google Scholar

16 Usher, op. cit., p. 151.

17 James, Marquis, The Metropolitan Life (New York, 1947), Chap, vii–xiii.Google Scholar

18 Redlich, Fritz, “The Origin of the Concepts of Entrepreneur and Creative Entrepreneur,” Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, vol. i, no. 2 (February, 1949), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

19 New, Irene, “Erastus Corning,” uncompleted MS thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar