¹ Hooper, Wilfrid, “The Tudor Sumptuary Laws,” English Historical Review, vol. XXX (July, 1915), pp. 448–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Baldwin, Frances E., Sumptuary Legislation and Personal Regulation in England (Baltimore, 1926), pp. 46–47.Google Scholar

³ Vincent, John M., Costume and Conduct in the Laws of Basel, Bern, and Zurich, 1370–1800 (Baltimore, 1935), p. 42.Google Scholar

⁴ I am indebted to Dr. Florence Edler de Roover for this information.

⁵ Gentleman's Magazine, vol. VIII (April, 1738), p. 191.

⁶ Sombart, Werner, Luxus und Kapitalismus (München & Leipzig, 1922), pp. 203–205.Google Scholar

⁷ Boehn, Max von, Die Mode: Menschen und Moden im Mittelalter (München, 1925), pp. 203–204.Google Scholar

⁸ Ibid., p. 174.

⁹ Boehn, Max von, Die Mode: Menschen und Moden im siebzehnten Jahrhundert (München, 1913), p. 139.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Boehn, Mittelalter, p. 201.

¹¹ Veblen, Thorstein, The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (New York, 1912), p. 126.Google Scholar

¹² Sombart, Luxus, pp. 68–69.

¹³ Boehn, Max von, Die Mode: Menschen und Moden im sechzehnten Jahrhundert (München, 1923), p. 149.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Boehn, Max von, Die Mode: Menschen und Moden im achtzehnten Jahrhundert (München, 1923), p. 208.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Schumpeter, Joseph A., History of Economic Analysis (New York, 1954), p. 324 n.Google Scholar This appears to have been the purpose of a French ordinance of 1633 which attempted to control dress to prevent the ruination of the courtiers. Beaulieu, Michèle, Contribution à l'Étude de la Mode à Paris: Les Transformations du Costume Elégant sous le Règne de Louis XIII (1610–1643) (Paris, 1936), p. 81.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Boehn, Mittelalter, pp. 241–42.

¹⁷ Gentleman's Magazine, vol. IX (January, 1739), p. 28.

¹⁸ Foley, Caroline A., “Fashion,” Economic Journal, vol. III (Sept., 1893), p. 465.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Sombart, Luxus, pp. 68–69; Vincent, Costume, p. 49.

²⁰ Boehn, Sechzehntes Jahrhundert, p. 174.

²¹ Baudrillart, Henri J. L., Histoire du Luxe Privé et Public (Paris, 1880–1881), vol. IV, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar

²² Boehn, Achtzehntes Jahrhundert, p. 128. The practice of having two such puppets began in the first half of the century — one large and one small. Beaulieu, Contribution, P. 11.

²³ Langlade, Emile, La Marchande de Modes de Marie Antoinette: Rose Berlin (Paris, n.d.), pp. 56–57.Google Scholar There is an English edition of this book, Rose Berlin: The Creator of Fashion at the Court of Marie Antoinette, adapted from the French by Angelo S. Rappoport (London, 1913).

²⁴ Platière, Roland de la, Encyclopédie Methodique, Manufactures, Arts, et Métiers (Paris, 1785), p. 133.Google Scholar

²⁵ Robinson, Dwight E., “Fashion Theory and Product Design,” Harvard Business Review, vol. XXXVI (Nov.-Dec, 1958), p. 128.Google Scholar

²⁶ Boehn, Achtzehntes Jahrhundert, p. 238. See also Blum, André, Histoire du Costume: Les Modes au XVII^e et au XVIII^e Siècles (Paris, 1928), pp. 74–75.Google Scholar

²⁷ Heckscher, Eli F., Mercantilism, trans, by Shapiro, Mendel (2 vols., London, 1935), vol. I, pp. 172–73.Google Scholar

²⁸ Vincent, John M., “Sumptuary Legislation,” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York, 1948), vol. XIV, p. 466.Google Scholar

²⁹ Coats, A. W., “Changing Attitudes to Labour in the Mid-Eighteenth Century,” Economic History Review, Second Series, vol. XI (Aug., 1958), pp. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁰ Spengler, Joseph J., “Mercantilist and Physiocratic Growth Theory,” in Hoselitz, Bert F. (ed.), Theories of Economic Growth (Glencoe, 1960), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar See also Johnson, E. A. J., “Unemployment and Consumption: The Mercantilist View,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. XLVI (Aug., 1932), pp. 698–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³¹ Gilboy, Elizabeth W., “Demand as a Factor in the Industrial Revolution,” Facts and Factors in Economic History (Cambridge, Mass., 1932), pp. 628–29.Google Scholar

³² Hume, David, Writings on Economics, ed. by Rotwein, Eugene (Madison, 1955), pp. 11, 28.Google Scholar Also, Bergius, Johann Heinrich Ludwig (ed.), Policey-und Cameral Magazin (Frankfurt a/M, 1773), vol. VII, pp. 180–205.Google Scholar

³³ Mandeville, Bernard, The Fable of the Bees; or, Private Vices, Public Benefits (Edinburgh, 1777), vol. I, pp. vii, 13.Google Scholar

³⁴ Landauer, Carl, Die Theorien der Merkantilisten und der Physiokraten fiber die oekonomische Bedeutung des Luxus (München, 1915), pp. 50, 104–106.Google Scholar

³⁵ Marperger, Johann Jacob, Das Neu-eröffnete Manufakturwarenhauss (Hamburg, 1704), pp. 13–15.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ibid., p. 13.

³⁷ Beer, Adolf, “Zwei Handschreiben von Maria Theresia iiber den Luxus,” Zeitschrift für Sozial und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, vol. I (1893), pp. 341–48.Google Scholar

³⁸ Hofkammerarchiv (Vienna), Boehm. Commerz, fasc. 100, red no. 890, f. 28ff.

³⁹ Ephemeriden der Menschheit, vol. XVIII (Sept., 1782), pp. 365–67.

⁴⁰ Ibid., vol. IV (Jan., 1778), pp. 87–90.

⁴¹ Ibid., vol. III (Feb., 1777), pp. 158–75.

⁴² Ibid., p. 170.

⁴³ Ephemerides du Citoyens (1767), part I, pp. 223ff.

⁴⁴ Ephemeriden der Menschheit, vol. IX (May, 1781), p. 528.

⁴⁵ Barkhausen, Ernst, Die Tuchindustrie in Montjoie, thr Aufstieg und Niedergang (Aachen, 1925), p. 34.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Hofkammerarchiv (Vienna), Boehm. Commerz, fasc. 101/1, red no. 891, 14. April, 1761.

⁴⁷ Langlade, Marchande, pp. 56–57. Marie-Jeanne (Rose) Bertin was apprenticed to a marchande de mode in Abbeville named Barbier who wanted to set up business in Paris with Rose. When Barbier's husband refused to go along, Rose went by herself in 1770 and Barbier joined her later after the latter's husband died. Barbier married M. Tetard, negotiant au drap et fournisseur de la Reine, in Paris, and the Tetards gave Bertin credits and supported her financially in other ways. Nouvion, Pierre de and Liez, Emile, Un Ministre des Modes sous Louis XVI: Mademoiselle Bertin (Paris, 1911), pp. 22–28.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Platière, Encyclopédie, p. 135.