Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Dimnik, Martin
2004.
The New Cambridge Medieval History.
p.
254.
Article contents
Peasant Categories in the Tenth and eleventh centuries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2016
Extract
The need for the state to protect its fiscal revenues is presented in the tenth-century legislation as a significant factor underlying the efforts made by the imperial administration to check the growing power of its provincial magnates and to make it more difficult for them to extend their properties at the expense of weaker peasants. In practice the most effective way for the state to maintain its revenues was to ensure through the regular activities of its fiscal officials that peasants who owed tax-payments to the state were not brought under the control of powerful lay and ecclesiastical landowners.
- Type
- Short Notes:
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1990
References
1. Harvey, A, Economic Expansion in the Byzantine Empire 900–1200 (Cambridge 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Lemerle, P., Guillou, A., Svoronos, N., Papachryssanthou, D., Actes de Lavra. Première partie. Des origines à 1204 (Archives de l’Athos, V) (Paris 1970) no.6 Google Scholar. Lefort, J., Oikonomidès, N., Papachryssanthou, D., Actes d’Iviron, I, Des origines au milieu du XIe siècle (Archives de l’Athos, XIV), (Paris 1985) no.2 Google Scholar. Ostrogorsky, G., Quelques problèmes d’histoire de la paysannerie byzantine (Brussels 1956).Google Scholar
3. Lemerle, P., The Agrarian History of Byzantium from the Origins to the Twelfth Century. The Sources and the Problems (Galway 1979) 167–77 Google Scholar. Ostrogorsky, Quelques problèmes.
4. Harvey, Economic Expansion, 46–7. Lemerle, The Agrarian History, 173–5.
5. Actes de Lavra, no.33.
6. Actes d’Iviron, no.2.
7. Ibid, no.6.
8. Actes de Lavra, no.55.
9. Camelia, R., ‘Basilio Minimo II’, BZ 26 (1926) 31 lines 1–3 Google Scholar. See also Kazhdan, A.P., Epstein, A.W., Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (University of California, Berkeley, Los Angeles 1985) 19–20.Google Scholar
10. Constantini Porphyrogeniti Imperatoris De Cerimoniis A ulae Byzantini Libri duo, ed. J.J. Reiske (2 vols., Bonn 1829) 488–9.
11. Ioannis ZonaraeEpitomeHistoriarum, ed. M. Pinder, T. Büttner-Wobst (3 vols., Bonn 1841–97) III, 506. Ostrogorsky, Quelques problèmes.
12. Actes de Lavra, no.6.
13. Actes d’Iviron, no.2.
14. Lemerle, , The Agrarian History, 115ff.Google Scholar
15. Ibid., 176 no.2. See also Actes de Lavra, I, 108; Actes d’Iviron, 111.
16. Actes de Lavra, no.36.
17. Actes d’Iviron, no.8. The prosodion also appears in a chrysobull of 1082, Goudas, M., ‘Byzantina engrapha tes en Atho hieras mones tou Batopediou’, EEBS 3 (1926) no.3, 127.Google Scholar
18. Actes de Lavra, no.33 line 33.
19. Dölger, F., ‘Ein Fall slavischer Einsiedlung im Hinterland von Thessalonike im 10. Jahrhundert’, Sitzungsberichte der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische ¡Classe (1952, Heft 1) 7 Google Scholar. Dölger’s correction has been omitted in the re-edition of this passage in Actes d’Iviron, pp.11–12. See also Lemerle, The Agrarian History, 69 n.2.
20. Oikonomidès, N., ‘L’évolution de l’organisation administrative de l’empire byzantin au XIe siècle (1025–1118)’, TM 6 (1976) 125–52.Google Scholar
21. Harvey, Economie Expansion, 72–3, 110–14.
22. Miklosich, F., Müller, J., Acta et diplomata Graeca medii aevi (6 vols., Vienna 1860–90) IV, 38.Google Scholar
23. Ibid., 317–18.
24. Ibid., 319–20.
- 1
- Cited by