Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T19:19:13.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Text as Song: The Oral Aspirations of Anghelos Sikelianos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Sarah Ekdawi
Sarah Ekdawi*
Affiliation:
St. Cross College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Any poem or poet worthy of the name must liberate the pure creative force of the human voice.’

‘The whole of Ancient Greek civilization is a product of poetic utterance: Homer sang; Pindar declaimed; Aeschylus spoke out from behind masks.’

‘Ancient texts — Homer, Hesiod, oracles, Orphic writings and so forth — gradually became the voice of the people.’

These statements were made by Sikelianos in a talk entitled “O which he delivered in 1938, and in which he postulates a historical progression from text to voice, rather than the reverse process. They are the statements of a literate poet writing in a literate age, but delighting, at the same time, in the ability of radio to ‘reassert the spell of orality’ (Havelock 1986: 31). They subvert the idea of literacy as progress and propose, in its place, an ideal of post-textual orality. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between such statements and the poetry of Sikelianos.

Type
Articles:
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 14 , 1990 , pp. 214 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avgeris, M. 1952. (Athens).Google Scholar
Gounelas, CD. 1989. (unpublished lecture).Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A. 1986. The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present (New Haven and London).Google Scholar
Karandonis, A. 1952. vol.52, no.611 (Christmas 1952): 22–30.Google Scholar
Kazantzakis, N. 1965. (Athens).Google Scholar
Keeley, E. 1983. Modem Greek Poetry: Voice and Myth (Princeton).Google Scholar
Kirk, G. 1984. Introduction to Homer: The Iliad, trans, by Fitzgerald, R. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kirk, G. 1985. The Iliad: a Commentary. Vol.1: Books 1–4 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Masson, D.J. 1967. ‘Vowel and consonant patterns in poetry’, in Chatman, S. and Levin, S.R. (eds.), Essays in the Language of Literature (Boston).Google Scholar
Ong, W.J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word (London and New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer-Sikelianou, E. 1943. ‘The poet Anghelos Sikelianos’, Athene (New York), vol.4, no.9: 23–7.Google Scholar
Paraschos, K. 1937. (Athens).Google Scholar
Seferis, G. 1974. II (Athens).Google Scholar
Sikelianos, A. 1944. 7: 247–53.Google Scholar
Sikelianou, A. 1985. (Athens).Google Scholar
Venezis, E. 1952. Christmas 1952: 4–5.Google Scholar
Vitti, M. 1979. (Athens).Google Scholar
Xydis, T. 1979. (Athens).Google Scholar