Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-30T20:14:01.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varus of Egypt: a Fictitious Military Martyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

David Woods
David Woods*
Affiliation:
St. Patrick’s College, Maynooth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The attitude of the early church to war and military service is a subject which has long exercised the attention of many scholars, and doubtlessly this will continue to be the case. There are those who hold a pacifist viewpoint and argue that originally the early Christians completely rejected military service, and there are others who are opposed to this viewpoint. However, all agree on one issue, that there is far less early material on this subject than one would initially prefer. Thus, both sides have felt the need to utilise sources and materials which would otherwise lie neglected, the hagiographical accounts of the early military martyrs in particular. Debate has now centred upon a relatively small number of texts, those which have traditionally been accepted as the genuine acts of authentic military martyrs, to which ever increasing attention has been paid. Unfortunately, concentration upon these texts in particular seems to have led to a neglect of texts which are of great interest in their own right. This was inevitable given that the accounts of the military martyrs have normally been examined only as to their suitability for use as weapons in the ongoing polemic concerning the ‘true’ attitude of the early church to war. Seldom has the development of the cult of military martyrs been regarded as a historical phenomenon worthy of study in itself. Thus, it is the purpose of this note to begin to rectify this situation by drawing attention to the neglected acts of a military martyr, Varus, who allegedly suffered death in Egypt during the reign of Galerius Maximianus (305-311).

Type
Research Article
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 20 , 1996 , pp. 175 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See P., Brock, The Military Question in the Early Church: A Selected Bibliography of a Century’s Scholarship 1888-1987 (Toronto 1988).Google Scholar

2. The pacifist viewpoint has been presented by, for example, Cadoux, C.J., The Early Christian Attitude to War: A Contribution to the History of Christian Ethics (London 1919)Google Scholar; also Hornus, J-M., It is not Lawful for Me to Fight: Early Christian Attitudes towards War, Violence and the State (Scottdale 1980: a revised transi, of the original French edition of 1960)Google ScholarPubMed. An alternative viewpoint has been presented by, for example, Harnack, A. von, Militia Christi: The Christian Religion and the Military in the First Three Centuries (Philadelphia 1981: a transi, by D. Mel. Gracie of the original German edition of 1905)Google Scholar; also Helgeland, J., Daly, R.J., and Burns, J.P., Christians and the Military: The Early Experience (Philadelphia 1985)Google Scholar. The later texts treat the subject of the military martyrs at greater length.

3. The military martyrs most commonly regarded as authentic historical figures are Marinus of Caesarea, Maximilian of Tebessa, Marcellus, Julius the Veteran, Dasius, and the 40 Martyrs of Sebasteia. Their acts, or rather their Testamentum in the case of the 40 Martyrs, can be found in H. Musurillo, The Acts ofthe Christian Martyrs (Oxford 1972). Individually these have often been the subject of monographs or collections of studies, which include Siniscalco, P., Massimiliano: un obiettore di coscienza del tardo impero (Turin 1974)Google Scholar, Pillinger, R., Das Martyrium des heiligen Dasius: Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar (Wien 1988)Google Scholar, and Mullett, M. and Wilson, A.M. (edd.), The Forty Martyrs of Sebasteia (Belfast, forthcoming).Google Scholar

4. Seldom do commentators attempt to reveal to their readers just how large an amount of material has been excluded from the debate. A useful list of just some of the military martyrs whose acts are routinely disregarded in this manner can be found in Pucciarelli, E. (ed.), I cristiani e il servizio militare: testimonianze dei primi tre secoli (Florence 1987) 316–7 Google Scholar. Helgeland, J., ‘Christians and the Roman Army from Marcus Aurelius to Constatóme’, ANRW II. 23. 1 (1979) 724–834 Google Scholar, esp. 820-30, provides a short discussion of a number of military martyrs which does not, however, fulfill his introductory promise ‘to include within the covers of this study all the martyr acts rather than only those which appeared to be authentic’

5. A notable exception being Webster, A.F.C., ‘Varieties of Christian Military Saints: From Martyrs under Caesar to Warrior Princes’, St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 24 (1980) 3–36.Google Scholar

6. The text of BHG 1862, together with a commentary, can be found in AASS. Oct. VIH (1853) 428-35, while BHG 1863 is to be found in PG 115, cols. 1141-60. An abbreviated English translation of BHG 1862 is to be found in Baring-Gould, S., The Lives of the Saints XII (Edinburgh 1914) 480–3.Google Scholar

7. The interpretation favoured in AASS. Oct. VIU, 432. See the edition by Meineke, A. (Berlin 1849; repr. Chicago 1992) 640 Google Scholar:

8. The text is that at PG 115, but, of necessity, I have changed the punctuation.

9. On the untrustworthy nature of much of the information in the Ethnika of Stephanos, see Honigmann, E., RE 3A (1929), cols. 2369–99 Google Scholar, passim.

10. Jones, A.H.M., The Later Roman Empire 284-602: A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey (Oxford 1964; rep. 1990) 654–5.Google Scholar

11. Rémondon, R., ‘Soldats des Byzance d’après un papyrus trouvé à Edfou’, Recherches de Papyrologie 1 (1961) 41-93, p.48.Google Scholar

12. Várady, L., ‘Additional notes on the problem of the late Roman cunei’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 11 (1963) 391–406.Google Scholar

13. Zos. HN5A5. However, modern commentators do not necessarily agree on this point. For example, Ridley, R.T., Zosimus’ New History: A Translation with Commentary (Canberra 1982) 122 Google Scholar, translates the relevant passage as ‘the emperor decided that five legions from Dalmatia should leave their own base there and come to guard the city.’

14. The following remark appears in the margin at AASS. Oct. VIII, 429: ‘Cod. ’

15. BHL 1764: ‘Probavit autem ilium in numero armarianorum, qui adsistebant ad manum regis’; BHG 310: See Woods, D., ‘St. Christopher, Bishop Peter of Attalia, and the Cohors Marmaritarum: A Fresh Examination’, Vigiliae Christianae 48 (1994) 170–86 Google Scholar, for a more detailed discussion of the relevant issues.

16. de’ Cavalieri, P. Franchi, ‘Note Agiografiche 4: La Passio S. Theagenis’, Studi e Testi 24 (1912) 161–85 Google Scholar, esp. 164. The edited text, BHG 2416, reads: whereas BHL 8107 reads: ‘Tempore enim Licinii paganissimi tyranni comprehensus est in Phrygia, cum esset episcopi fllius, et perductus est ad legionem quae dicitur Secunda Traiano, ad tribunum Zilicentium, et praepositum Possidonium, quae legio considebat in Zyzico, quae est prima Hellesponti.’

17. Saddington, D.B., ‘St. Ignatius, Leopards, and the Roman Army’, JThS ns 38 (1987) 411–2.Google Scholar

18. Gaiffier, B. de, ‘S. Marcel de Tanger ou de Léon? Evolution d’une légende’, AB 61 (1943) 116-39, esp. 125–7.Google Scholar

19. Accepting the text of Lanata, G., ‘Gli atti del processo contro il centurione Marcello’, B 42 (1972), 509–22 Google Scholar, one notes that Marcellus met his death at Tingis in the province of Mauretania Tingitana. However, after a brief spell in Palestine, the legio II Troiana was stationed in Egypt since the beginning of the 2nd century, and was still there at the end of the 4th century according to the Notitia Dignitatum. Although it is probable that vexillationes may have been detached for various eastern wars, there is no evidence to suggest that any detachments were ever sent to Mauretania Tingitana.

20. Woods, D., ‘The Origin of the Legend of Maurice and the Theban Legion’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 45 (1994) 385–95.Google Scholar

21. E.g. the author of BHG 1761, the passion of St. Theodore the Recruit, borrowed the title of the military unit to which he attributed St. Theodore, the from the account of the martyrdom of St. Christopher, BHG 310.

22. Zos. HN 1.52.4: Ridley, R.T., op. cit., refers to ‘the Mauretanian horse, and Asian forces from Tyana, Mesopotamia, Syria, Phoenicia, and Palestine, some of the bravest legions’. L. Várady, art. cit., 405 Google Scholar, admits that this passage ‘could refer to such Roman troops whose names were derived from the mentioned geographical terms, although the probable coincidence of name and station … is undeniable’.

23. Stoneman, R., Palmyra and its Empire: Zenobia ‘s Revolt against Rome (Ann Arbor 1992) 165–79 Google Scholar, for an account of Aurelian’s campaign against Zenobia.

24. Mann, J.C., ‘The Notitia Dignitatum — Dating and Survival’, Britannia 22 (1991) 215–9 Google Scholar; also Price, R.M., ‘The Limes of Lower Egypt’, in Goodburn, R. and Bartholomew, P. (edd.), Aspects of the Notitia Dignitatum (Oxford 1976) 143–55 Google Scholar.

25. Jones, A.H.M., op. cit., 57–9 Google Scholar. For concrete examples, see Zuckerman, C., ‘Legio VMacedonica in Egypt’, Tyche 3 (1988) 279–87 Google Scholar, and again ‘Le Camp de /Sosteos et Les Catafractarii’, ZPE 100 (1994) 199-202, on the ala III Assyriorum stationed at Psobthis since c.326 at least; also Thomas, J.D., ‘The Earliest Occurrence of the Exactor Civitatis in Egypt (P. Giss. inv. 126 recto)’, YCS 28(1978) 115–26 Google Scholar, on the ala II Abasgorum stationed at the Great Oasis since 309 at least. See also Roxan, M., ‘Pre-Severan Auxilia Named in the Notitia Dignitatum ’, in Goodburn, R. and Bartholomew, P. (edd.), op. cit., 59–80 Google Scholar, esp. 73-7, for several auxiliary units which had remained stationed in Egypt since the early 1st century even.

26. Not. Dig., Or., XXXI. 62.

27. Berchem, D. Van, L’armée de Dioclétien et la réforme constantinienne (Paris 1952) 67.Google Scholar

28. Worp, K. A., ‘The Notitia Dignitatum and the Geography of Egypt: Observations on Some Military Camps and Place Names In Upper Egypt’, in Bülow-Jacobsen, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress Papyrologists Copenhagen, 23-29 August, 1992 (Copenhagen 1994) 463-9, esp. 466 Google Scholar.

29. AASS. Oct. VIII, 431.

30. Not. Dig., Or. VIII. 49; Amm. 25.1.19.

31. On the military history of this region, see Zuckerman, C., ‘The Early Byzantine Strongholds in Eastern Pontus’, TM 11 (1991) 527–53 Google Scholar.

32. See Bowman, A.K., ‘The Military Occupation of Upper Egypt in the Reign of Diocletian’, Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 15 (1978) 25–38.Google Scholar

33. See Woods, D., ‘St. Christopher, Bishop Peter of Attalia, and the Cohors Mar-maritarum’, art. cit.,Google Scholar for the scant detail of Diocletian’s campaign in Egypt in 302. An additional point concerns the significance of the presence of the comités during the campaign to pacify the Marmaritae. See Speidel, M., Riding for Caesar: The Roman Emperor’s Horse Guard (London 1994) 72–5 Google Scholar, for the award of ‘the title comités to those who escorted the rulers in the field.’

34. From Klostermann, E., Eusebius Werke III: Dos Onomastikon der biblischen Ortsnamen (GCS: Leipzig 1904) 108.Google Scholar

35. The following settlements are located with respect to Mt. Tabor, and references here are to the relevant page and line in the edition by Klostermann, E., op. cit.: Acsaf (22, 3-5)Google Scholar, Aendor (34, 8-10), Dabeira (78, 5-7), Cison (116, 23-24), Nazareth (138, 24-140, 2), Naeim (140, 3-5), Soulem (158, 11), Sion (158, 13), Saron (162, 3-6).

36. Isaac, B. and Roll, I., Roman Roads in Judaea I: The Legio-Scythopolis Road (Oxford 1982) 7–14 Google Scholar.

37. CCSL 175, 13.

38. Jer. Comm. in Zachar. 12 (PL 25, 1515); Comm in Hoseam 1 (PL 25, 825).

39. See Taylor, J.E., Christians and the Holy Places: The Myth of Jewish-Christian Origins (Oxford 1993) 56–64 Google Scholar, on the Christian presence in Palestine at the beginning of the 4th century.

40. Barnes, T.D., Constantine and Eusebius (Cambridge, Mass. 1981) 149 Google Scholar.

41. Louth, A., ‘The Date of Eusebius’ Historia Ecclesiastica’, JThS m Al (1990) 111–23 Google Scholar.

42. See Ussishkin, D. and Woodhead, J., ‘Excavations at Tel Jezreel 1990-1991 : Preliminary Report’, Tel Aviv 19 (1992) 3–56 Google Scholar.

43. BEL 8354; see Woods, D., ‘An Unnoticed Official: The Praepositus Saltos ’, Classical Quarterly ns 44 (1994) 245–51 Google Scholar, on the date and nature of this text.

44. On the development of monasticism in Egypt, see Judge, E.A., ‘The Earliest Use of Monachos for “Monk” (P. Coll. Youtie 77), and the Origins of Monasticism’, Jahrbuch fur Antike und Christentum 20 (1977) 72–89.Google Scholar

45. Binns, J., Ascetics and Ambassadors of Christ: The Monasteries of Palestine, 314-631 (Oxford 1994) 142–3 Google Scholar.

46. Maraval, P., La Passion inédite de S. Athénogène de Pédachthoé en Cappadoce (BHG 197b) Brussels 1990)Google Scholar.

47. Hunt, E.D., ‘St. Silvia of Aquitaine: The Role of a Theodosian Pilgrim in the Society of East and West’, JThS ns 23 (1972) 351–73 Google Scholar.

48. Cyril. Scyth, Vit. Euthym. 87 (PG 114, 669).

49. Holum, K.G., Theodosian Empresses: Women and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity (Berkeley 1982), 20-1, 56-7, 103-4, 137, 219 Google Scholar.

51. Hunt, E.D., ‘The Traffic in Relics: Some Late Roman Evidence’, in Hackel, S. Google Scholar (ed.),

The Byzantine Saint (London 1981) 171-80.

52. Mango, C., ‘Constantine’s Mausoleum and the Translation of Relics’, BZ 85 (1992)Google Scholar

53. Joh. Chrys. In Martyres Aegyptios 1 (PG 50, 693-695).

54. Eus. HE6.5; see the comments by Barnes, T.D., ‘Pre-Decian Acta Martyrum’, JThS ns 19 (1968) 509-31, esp. 525–7 Google Scholar.

55. Eus. «£6.41.22.

56. E.g. the soldiers and sailors who drowned St. Theagenes were converted immediately afterwards, BHL 8106. 11:’ Venientes autem in civitatem, narraverunt omnia quae videront fecisse sanctum martyrem Theagenem, et crediderunt in Domino. Praeterea et alia turba de ipsa legione credidit Domino. ‘ Again, although there is much of historical value in the early accounts of the martyrdom of St. Christopher, the account of the conversion of those soldiers who were sent to arrest him does not necessarily deserve any credence. They were baptised, and escorted St. Christopher back to trial, BHL 1764. 20: ‘Et respiciens ad milites, dicit: Venite, societatemfaciamus, ut máximas coronas mereamur. Illi autem continuo, sicut ex longa peregrinatione venientes, proicientes arma et vestes suas in fadem regis, prociderunt ad pedes sancii Ghristophori, et adoraverunt eum, dicentes: Avefamule Dei excelsi. Vocatio tua lumen nobis factum est. Et dicunt ad regem: Nos christiani sumus, et non immolamus iam daemoniis amplius.’ Following such defiance, they were naturally beheaded.

57. It is very tempting to detect in the description of a heavenly unit of first-born a corrupt reference to a corps of heavenly protectores domestici, such is the similarity between the terms first-born, and , protector. On the protectores, see Haldon, J.F., Byzantine Praetorians: An Administrative, Institutional and Social Survey of the Opsikion and Tagmata c. 580-900 (Bonn 1984) 130–6 Google Scholar. This would further emphasise the contrast between service of state and service of God, if Cleopatra’s son had held the exact same position in each. However, on balance, the present reading is probably correct, and must be interpreted rather in terms of the treatment of the first-born in the Bible. The first-born son belonged in an especial way to God, as did the first-born of animals. Ordinarily, though, animals were sacrificed to God, while the first-born son was redeemed by an alternative offering to God (Ex. 13.2, 22.29, 34.20; Lv. 27.26; Nm. 8.17; Dt. 15.19).

58. Tert. De Idololatria 19.2: ‘Non convenu sacramento divino et humano, signo Christi et signo diaboli, castrís lucis et castris tenebrarum; non potest una anima duobus deberi, deo et Caesari.’ Interestingly, Bohec, Y. Le, ‘Tertullien, De Corona 1: Carthage ou Lámbese?’, Revue des Etudes Augustiniennes 38 (1992) 6–18 Google Scholar, argues that the subject of this work was executed at Rome rather than in North Africa, and that he was in fact a member of the praetorian guard. Thus, the rejection by members of the imperial guard of service of the state in favour of service of God can now be traced back as far as the opening years of the 3rd century.

59. Kessels, A.H.M. and der Horst, P.W. van, ‘The Vision of Dorotheus (Pap. Bodmer 29): Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Notes’, Vigiliae Christianae 41 (1987) 313–59 Google Scholar.

60. Scourfield, J.H.D., Consoling Heliodorus: A Commentary on Jerome, Letter 60 (Oxford 1993) 52–5 Google Scholar.

61. On Dalmatius, AASS. Aug. II, 213-24.

62. The commentary at AASS. Oct. VIII, 436, suggests that it should read lÇ in the belief that there existed a fixed age of enrolment at 17 years of age.

63. A fine illustration of the fact that no fixed age of enrolment existed is provided by a late 3rd or early 4th century inscription, CIL XI 6168, which records the death of two brothers, members of the comités imperatoris, who had both served 2 years and 6 months before their deaths together, the older aged 21 years, 2 months, and 6 days, while the younger was aged 20 years and 12 days. In the case of Cleopatra’s son, the most obvious comparison is with Martin of Tours who was enrolled among the scholae palatinae at court, at 15 years of age apparently, Sulp. Sev. Vit. Mart. 2.5. However, the circumstances surrounding his conscription are much disputed, and it seems probable that he was conscripted during a particularly vicious civil-war when an urgent need of man-power affected recruitment policy accordingly. See Woods, D., ‘A Note Concerning the Early Career of Valentinian I’, Ancient Society 26 (1995), 273–88 Google Scholar.

64. Hoffmann, D., ‘Die spätrömischen Soldatengrabschriften von Concordia’, Museum Helveticum 20 (1963) 22–57 Google Scholar, inscription nos 1, 8, 32.

65. Musurillo, H., op. cit., 249: ‘annorum fuit in saeculo XXI et mensium III. dierum X et VIII’Google Scholar

66. Grégoire, H., ‘Sainte Salsa, roman épigraphique’, B 12 (1937) 212–34 Google Scholar.

67. See Dudden, F. Homes, The Life and Times of St. Ambrose (Oxford 1935) 298–320 Google Scholar; also McLynn, N.B., Ambrose of Milan: Church and Court in a Christian Capital (Berkeley 1994) 209–19 Google Scholar.

68. On burial ad sanctos, see Duval, Y., Auprès des saints corps et âme: L’inhumation ‘ad sanctos’ dans la chrétienté d’Orient et d’Occident du Ule au Vile siècle (Paris 1988)Google Scholar; also Rotila, H., Memoria mortuorum: Commemoration of the departed in Augustine (Rome 1992) 77–85 Google Scholar.

69. Soz. HE 9.2.

70. Soz. HE 9.17.