1 Fiske, J., Reading the Popular (Boston 1989) 149-50Google Scholar.

2 Apple, M. W., The State and the Politics of Knowledge (New York 2003) 1 Google Scholar.

3 Kaplan, S., ‘“Religious nationalism”: a textbook case from Turkey’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 25/3 (2005) 669 Google Scholar. Van Peer, W. ‘Invisible textbooks: writing as cultural practice’, in De Castell, S., Luke, A. and Luke, C. (eds), Readings on the School Textbook (New York 1989) 127 Google Scholar.

4 Tunçay, M., ‘İlk ve ortaöğretimde tarih [History in primary and secondary education]’, Pelsefe Kurumu Seminerleri (Ankara 1977) 284 Google Scholar as it appeared in Kabapinar, Y., ‘Bir ideolojik miicadele alani olarak lise tarih kitaplan-II [High school textbooks as grounds for ideological dispute-II]’, Tarih ve Toplum 107 (November 1992) 31 Google Scholar.

5 Borrow, R. and Woods, R., An Introduction to Philosophy of Education (London 1988) 71 Google Scholar, 73.

6 For a general introduction to the history of studies on history education in Turkey and for works that examine the issues mentioned above, see Özbaran, S. (ed.), Tarih Ögretimi ve Ders Kitapları [Teaching History and Textbooks] (İzmir 1998)Google Scholar. Demircioğlu, İ. H., ‘Türkiye’de tarih eğitiminin tarihi [History of history education in Turkey]’, Türkiye Araştırmahrı Literatur Dergisi 6/12 (2008) 438-40Google Scholar.

7 For relevant articles, see Özbaran, Teaching History and Textbooks.

8 Copeaux, E., Türk Tarih Tezinden Turk-Islam Sentezine: Tarih Ders Kitaplartnda, 1931-1993 [From the Turkish Historical Thesis to the Turco-lslamic Synthesis: in the History textbooks 1931-1993] (Istanbul 2000) 284–9Google Scholar. Millas, H., ‘Türk ders kitaplannda Yunanhlar: Bütünleştirici bir yaklaşım [Greeks in the Turkish school textbooks: a comprehensive approach]’, in Tarih Eğitimi ve Tarihte “Ötekî’ Sorunu [History Education and the Problem of the Other in History] (Istanbul, 1998) 256 Google Scholar. Ursinus, M. ‘Der schlechteste Staat’: Ahmed Midhat Efendi (1844-1912) on Byzantine institutions’, BMGS 11 (1987) 237-43Google Scholar. Ursinus, M., ‘Byzantine History in Late Ottoman Turkish historiography’, BMGS 10 (1986) 211-22Google Scholar. For a comparative study of Greek and Turkish history textbooks, see P. Stathis, ‘Yunan ve [Türk] tarih ders kitaplarinda “Ben” ve “Öteki” sorunu’ [The problem of ‘Me’ and the ‘Other’ in the Greek and Turkish history textboooks], in History Education and the Problem of the Other, 125-33. Millas, H., ‘History textbooks in Greece and Turkey’, History Workshop 31 (1991) 21–33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the perception of the Byzantine period in the field of archaeology in the early republican period in general, see Ergin, M., ‘Archaeology and the perception of Greek, Roman, and Byzantine eras in early republican Turkey’, in Redford, S. and Ergin, N. (eds), Perceptions of the Past in the Turkish Republic (Classical and Byzantine Periods) (Leuven 2010) 13–33 Google Scholar.

9 The role of the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople in leading to the flight of some Byzantine intellectuals to Italy, a point that is belaboured and exaggerated in Turkish textbooks, is not dealt with here because the subject falls outside the chronological focus of this article.

10 For the history of Byzantine studies in Turkish universities, see Yıldız, Ş. Kılıç, ‘A review of Byzantine studies and architectural historiography in Turkey today (1)’, Middle East Technical University, Journal of faculty of Architecture 28:2 (2011/2) 63–80 Google Scholar. E. Akyürek, ‘Byzantine art history in modern Turkey’, in S. Redford and N. Ergin (eds), Perceptions of the Past, 205-24. Delilbaşı, M., ‘The present and future of Byzantine studies in Turkey’, in Evangelatou-Notara, F. and Maniate-Kokkine, T. (eds), Κλητόριον eis μνήμην Νίκον Οικονομίδη [In Memory of Nikos Oikonomides] (Athens-Thessalonike 2005) 63–72 Google Scholar. Necipoğlu, N., ‘Türkiye’de Bizans tarihçiliğinin dünü, bugünü ve sorunlan [The past, the present and the problems of the study of Byzantine History in Turkey]’, Toplumsal Tarih 112 (April 2003) 72-7Google Scholar. Ötüken, Y., ‘Türkiye’de Bizans sanati [Byzantine art in Turkey]’, Toplumsal Tarih 112 (2003) 78-9Google Scholar. Necipoğlu, N., ‘The current state and future direction of Byzantine history in Turkey’, in Kafescioğlu, Ç. and Thys-Şenocak, L. (eds), Aptullah Kuran Için YazılarlEssays in Honour of Aptullah Kuran (Istanbul 1999) 37–41 Google Scholar. For bibliography on works on Byzantine history, art history, and archaeology written by Turkish Byzantinists, see Eyice, S., ‘Türkiye’de Bizans sanati araştırmaları ve İstanbul Üniversitesinde Bizans sanati [Studies on Byzantine art in Turkey and Byzantine art in İstanbul Üniversity]’, in Cumhuriyet’in 50. Yılına Armağanı (Istanbul 1973) 375–428 Google Scholar. Necipoğlu, ‘Türkiye’de Bizans tarihçiliğinin dünü, bugünü’, 74-5. On Köprülü’s, M. F. ‘Bizans müesseselerinin Osmanli müesseselerine tesiri hakkinda bazi mülahazalar [Some observations on the influence of Byzantine institutions on Ottoman institutions]’, Türk Hukuk ve İktisat Tarihi Mecmuasi 1 (1931)Google Scholar, where the author claimed that Byzantine institutions did not have any direct influence on Ottoman institutions, and on the negative effects of this work on the fate of Byzantine studies in Turkey, see Belge, M., ‘Obadan Kubbeye: Tarih yaziminda bir ekol [From nomad’s tent to dome: a school in historical writing]’, Cogito 17 (Winter 1999) 395–401 Google Scholar, especially 401. Necipoğlu, ‘Türkiye’de Bizans tarihçiliğinin dünü, bugünü’, 77 no. 17. Berktay, H., Cumhuriyet ideolojisi ve Fuat Kóprülü (Ankara, 1983) 20 Google Scholar, 63-80. For a brief and indirect reference to the negative impact of the re-organization of higher education after the 1980 coup d’état on the study of Byzantine history, see Özbaran, S., ‘1980’den günümüze tarih çalışmaları [Historical studies from 1980 up to the present]’, Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi vol. 15 (Istanbul 1983-96) 1359 Google Scholar.

11 Apple, The State and the Politics of Knowledge, 7. For a detailed discussion of the education system in Turkey, see Kaplan, İ. Türkiye’de Milli Eğitim Ideolojisi [Ideology of National Education in Turkey] (Istanbul 1999)Google Scholar. Copeaux, From the Turkish Historical Thesis to the Turco-Islamic Synthesis, 5-6. On the process of publishing textbooks in the first decade of 2000s, see Bıyıkh, S. G., Representation of Cultural Heritage in Textbooks: Examination of the Illustrations in the 4th and 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks (1974-2009) in Turkey, MA thesis at Koç University (June 2010) 11–16 Google Scholar.

12 Apple, M. W., ‘Cultural politics and the text’, in Ball, S. J. (ed.), The Routledge Fainter Reader in Sociology of Education (London 2004) 191 Google Scholar.

13 For a list of possible ways of re-producing historical data in order to fit ideological needs, see Wirth, L., ‘Facing misuses of history’, in The Misuses of History (Strasbourg 2000) 38–56 Google Scholar.

14 For the Ottoman period, see Sakaoğlu, N., Osmanli’dan Cünümüze Eğitim Tarihi [History of Education from the Ottoman Empire to the Present] (Istanbul 2003)Google Scholar. Aydin, I., Osmanltdan Günümüze Tarih Ders kita-phrt [History Textbooks from the Ottoman Period to the Present] (Ankara 2001) 23–30 Google Scholar. Demircioğlu, ‘History of history education in Turkey’, 431. Tekeli, İ. and İlkin, S., Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Eğitim ve Bilgi Üretim Sisteminin Olusumu ve Dönüşümü [The Formation and Transformation of the System of Education and Knowledge Creation in the Ottoman Empire] (Ankara 1993) 176-82Google Scholar.

15 Âli, Emin, Umumt Tarih I (General History I) (Istanbul 1929) 311-15Google Scholar.

16 Âli, Emin, Urnumî Tarih II (General History II) (Istanbul 1929) 16–26 Google Scholar.

17 Refik, Ahmet, Umumt Tarih I (General History I) (Istanbul 1929)Google Scholar.

18 Çapa, M., ‘Cumhiriyetin ilk yillarinda tarih öğretimi [History education in the first years of the Turkish Republic]’, Atatürk Yolu Dergisi 29-30 (May-November 2002) 47 Google Scholar.

19 Refik, Ahmet, General History I, 354 Google Scholar, 359, 361.

20 Refik, Ahmet, General History I, 354 Google Scholar, 355, 359, 362. Âli, Emin, General History I, 312-13Google Scholar, and General History II, 23-6.

21 Copeaux, Front the Turkish Historical Thesis to the Turco-lslamic Synthesis, 38-53. Demircioğlu, ‘History of history education in Turkey’, 433-435. Kabapınar, Y., ‘Bir ideolojik mücadele alani olarak lise tarih kitapları-I [Highschool textbooks as grounds for ideological dispute-I]’, Tarih ve Toplum 106 (October 1992) 37 Google Scholar. For a general introduction in Turkish to the Turkish Historical Thesis, see Behar, B. E., İktidar ve Tarih: Tiirkiye’de “Resmi Tarih” Tezinin Olusumu, 1929-1937 [Political Power and Education: Formation of “the Official History” in Turkey, 1929-1937] (Istanbul 1992)Google Scholar.

22 Tarih II [History II] by Cemiyeti, Türk Tarih Tetkik (Istanbul 1933) 20-7Google Scholar, 60-79. The differentiation in English between the terms Turkish that refers to the Turks of Western Asia and Turkic that refers to the Turks of Central Asia does not exist in the Turkish language. The term Türkî in Turkish that comes closest to Turkic in meaning is a term used for post-Soviet Turkic states in Central Asia, and is not employed for Turks of Central Asia in the Middle Ages.

23 History II by Türk Tarih Tetkik Cemiyeti, 39-40, 43.

24 History II by Türk Tarih Tetkik Cemiyeti, 225, 282.

25 Ibid., 40-3.

26 Ibid., 39, 42, 43.

27 Demircioğlu, ‘History of history education in Turkey’, 436. Copeaux, From the Turkish Historical Thesis to the Turco-Islamic Synthesis, 54-6. Carpenter, S. E., Turkish National Education and Political Transition: 1939-1960: Evolving Perceptions of Schooling (Saarbrücken 2009)Google Scholar.

28 Aydın, History Textbooks from the Ottoman Period to the Present, 78.

29 Kabapınar, ‘Highschool textbooks as a ground of ideological dispute-II’, 29.

30 Atsiz, B. and Oran, H., Ortaçağ Tarihi 11 (History of Middle Ages 11) (Istanbul 1963) 13–26 Google Scholar. Akşit, N., Tarih II (History 11) (Istanbul 1969) 14–30 Google Scholar. Oktay, E., Tarih II (History II) (Istanbul, 1988) 16–38 Google Scholar.

31 Atsiz, and Oran, , History of Middle Ages II, 23-4Google Scholar. Akşit, , History II, 27-8Google Scholar. Oktay, , History II, 24 Google Scholar, 27-8.

32 Oktay, , History II, 24 Google Scholar, 27.

33 Ibid., 17, 35-6.

34 Atsız, and Oran, , History of Middle Ages II, 20-1Google Scholar.

35 Ibid., 14, 18.

36 Copeaux, Front the Turkish Historical Thesis to the Turco-lshmic Synthesis, 56-72. Güvenç, B. et al., Türk-İslam Sentezi Dosyasi [Dossier on the Turco-lslamic Synthesis] (Istanbul 1994)Google Scholar. Kabapinar, ‘High-school textbooks as grounds for ideological dispute-II’, 28.

37 Kafesoğlu, İ. and Deliorman, A., Tarih II [History II] (Ankara 1976) 73 Google Scholar, 75, 88, 92, 213-18.

38 Kara, K., Tarih I [History I] (Istanbul 2007) 6-10Google Scholar, 48-50, 115, 117.

39 Okur, Y. et al., Tarih 9 [History 9] (Istanbul 2008) 67 Google Scholar.

40 Merçil, E. et al., Tarih 1 [History I] (Istanbul 1989) 134-5Google Scholar, 139, 188-9.

41 Kara, , History I, 6-10Google Scholar, 48-50. The idea that twelve dynasties ruled the Byzantine empire is repeated in Maden, M. et al., Tarih I [History I] (Istanbul 2007) 27 Google Scholar.

42 Kara, , History I, 230-1Google Scholar, 280.

43 The view that Byzantine Anatolia was largely depopulated and was a scene of constant warfare is also voiced in Cahen, C.’s Pre-Ottoman Turkey: a General Survey of the Material and Spiritual Culture and History c. 1071-1330 (New York 1968) 64-5Google Scholar. For economic expansion in the period from the tenth to the twelfth centuries in Byzantium, see Laiou, A. E. and Morrisson, C., The Byzantine Economy (Cambridge 2007) 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 65-8, 93, 164-5. Harvey, A., Economic Expansion in the Byzantine Empire, 900-1200 (Cambridge 1989) 200-2Google Scholar. Lemerle, P., Cinq études sur le Xle siècle byzantin (Paris 1977) 287-93Google Scholar. For a more detailed examination of the Byzantine economy in the middle Byzantine period, see the relevant articles in Laiou, A. E. (ed.), Economic History of Byzantium: from the Seventh Through the Fifteenth Century (Washington, D.C. 2002)Google Scholar.

44 Kara, , History I, 279 Google Scholar.

45 Kopraman, K. Y. et al., Tarih I [History I] (Ankara 1993) 156 Google Scholar. Gündoğdu, A. and Bulduk, O. Ü., Tarih I [History I] (Ankara 2002) 56 Google Scholar. Maden, et al., History I, 47 Google Scholar,161. Okur, et al., History 9, 81–96 Google Scholar.

46 Gündoğdu and Bulduk, History, 217,248. Kopraman, et al., History I, 162 Google Scholar,165. Maden, et al., History I, 163 Google Scholar, 190. Okur, et al., History 9, 181 Google Scholar.

47 Savvides, A. G. K., Byzantium in the Near East: Its Relations with the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum in Asia Minor, the Armenians of Cilicia and the Mongols, A.D. c. 1192-1237 (Thessalonike 1981) 123-49Google Scholar. Vryonis, S., The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of lslamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century (Berkeley 1971) 169-94Google Scholar, 223-44. Cahen, Pre-Ottoman Turkey, 190-1, 202-3, 326-8.

48 Merçil, et al., History I, 189 Google Scholar. Kopraman, et al., History I, 65 Google Scholar.

49 Referring to the religious divisions among the Christians of Byzantium, Walter Kaegi claims, ‘it is not clear that these divisions were decisive in weakening Byzantine authority’. Kaegi, W. E., Byzantium and the Early Islamic Conquests (Cambridge, 1992), 30, 213-18CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Moorhead shows that Miaphysites of Egypt did not welcome the early Muslims, but many among them resisted the newcomers. Moorhead, J., ‘The Monophy-site response to the Arab invasion’, 51 (1981) 579-91Google Scholar. For the response of Syrian Christians, see van Ginkel, J. J., ‘The perception and presentation of the Arab conquest in Syriac historiography: How did the changing social position of the Syrian Orthodox community influence the account of their historiographies?’ in Grypeou, E., Swanson, M. and Thomas, D. (eds), The Encounter of Eastern Christianity with Early Islam (Leiden 2006) 171-84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Kopraman, et al., History I, 162-3Google Scholar. Gündoğdu, and Bulduk, , History I, 208 Google Scholar. Maden, et al., History I, 162 Google Scholar. It is true that during the resettlement of some Armenians in western regions such as Cappadocia and Cilicia, some tension existed between the new-comers and the local population, especially on religious grounds. However, this resettlement had some positive effects for the Byzantine economy and military security, and the religious hostility that Byzantines and Armenians felt towards each other was not, in Garso’ian’s words, monolithic and uniform. Greenwood, T. W., ‘Armenian neighbours 600-1045’, in Shepard, J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire с 500-1492 (Cambridge 2008) 363–4Google Scholar. Shepard, J., ‘Byzantium expanding, 944-1025’, in Reuter, T. (ed.), The New Cambridge Medieval History c.900-c.1024 (Cambridge c2008) III, 603 Google Scholar. Garsoi, N. G.’an, ‘The problem of Armenian integration into the Byzantine Empire’, in Ahrweiler, H. and Laiou, A. E. (eds), Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire (Washington D.C. 1998) 53-124Google Scholar. For the positive role that Armenians played in the Byzantine army’s push towards the east in the tenth century, see Charanis, P., The Armenians in the Byzantine Empire (Lisbon 1963) 32-5Google Scholar.

51 On the fight for succession to the throne, see Kopraman, et al., History I, 162 Google Scholar. Maden, et al., History I, 27 Google Scholar. Okur, et al., History 9, 170 Google Scholar.

52 Maden, et al., History I, 47 Google Scholar. Okur, et al., History 9, 81-2Google Scholar. Cazgir, et al., History 10, 13 Google Scholar, 39.

53 Gündoğdu, and Bulduk, , History I, 58 Google Scholar, 68, 216, 230. Okur, et al., History 9, 169 Google Scholar, 171. Çaka Beg was a Turkish military leader who established a short-lived principality in the Aegean region in the eleventh century

54 Kopraman, et al., History I, 83 Google Scholar. Okur, et al., History 9, 102 Google Scholar, 148. Maden, et al., History I, 27 Google Scholar.

55 Oktay, , History II, 22 Google Scholar, 24.

56 Okur, et al., History 9, 67 Google Scholar.