Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:38:10.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hesiod's Metallurgy Simile (Th. 861–7)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Naomi Rood
Naomi Rood
Affiliation:
Colgate University, Hamilton, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hesiod's Theogony contains three similes, each of which elaborates a climactic moment in Zeus' securing of power: an image of bees (594–602) describes the nature of women in the Pandora episode, the aftermath of Zeus' triumph over Prometheus; battle resounds with a crash as if earth and heaven are coming together (699–705) in the climax of the Titanomachy, wherein Zeus and the Olympians overcome the Titans; and Zeus is likened to a craftsman melting ore (861–7) during his conquest of his final challenger, Typhoeus. In each episode complemented by a simile, Zeus' power attains greater stability; in the aftermath of the last of these episodes, the Typhonomachy, his power achieves permanent ascendancy (881–5). Despite the prominent occasions of these similes, they stand largely unexplored. This paper considers the simile of metallurgy in the Typhonomachy, the simile that reconfigures Zeus' final acquisition of power. Positioned at such a critical moment, attention to this simile promises to reveal elements fundamental to an understanding of Zeus' ultimate power.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 53 , 2007 , pp. 112 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, N. (1975) Archery at the dark of the moon, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1983) ‘Odysseus and the Cyclops: who is who?’, in Rubino, C. A. and Shelmerdine, C. W. (eds.) Approaches to Homer, Austin, 3–37.Google Scholar
Ballabriga, A. (1996) ‘Le cent-bras Briarée, fils de Zeus plus fort que son père: unc correction de la Théogonie (886–900) dans l'Iliade (1.393–406)’, Kernos 9, 257–70.Google Scholar
Beal, T. K. (2002) Religion and its monsters, New York and London.Google Scholar
Blaise, F. (1992) ‘L'épisode de Typhée dans la Théogonie d'Hésiode (v. 820–885): la stabilisation du monde’, REG 105, 349–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1968) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots, Paris.Google Scholar
Clare, R. J. (1998) ‘Representing monstrosity: Polyphemus in the Odyssey’, in Atherton, C. (ed.) Monsters and monstrosity in Greek and Roman culture, Nottingham Classical Literature Studies 6, 1–18.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (1995) ‘Between lions and men: images of the hero in the Iliad’, GRBS 36:137–59.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1993) ‘The generation of monsters in Hesiod’, CP 88, 105–16.Google ScholarPubMed
de Jong, I. F. (1987) Narrators and focalizers: the presentation of the story in the Iliad, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J. (1978) Cunning intelligence in Greek culture and society (French orig. 1974), Chicago.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (2001) The raft of Odysseus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, H. (1973) Studien zur Odyssee, Palingenesia 7, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Giacomelli, A. (1980) ‘Aphrodite and after’, Phoenix 34.1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Gotshalk, R. (2000) Homer and Hesiod: myth and philosophy, Lanham MD.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (1989) The architecture of Hesiodic poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (1998) ‘The plastic arts in Homeric society’, in Childs, W. (ed.) Reading Greek art, Princeton, 25–66.Google Scholar
Holmberg, I. E. (1997) ‘The sign of mêtis’, Arethusa 30.1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1930) Hesiodi Theogonia, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (1998) ‘“Foul monster or good saviour?” Reflections on ritual monsters’, in Atherton, C. (ed.) Monsters and monstrosity in Greek and Roman culture, Nottingham Classical Literature Studies 6, 41–82.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1988) Hesiod, New Haven.Google Scholar
Mondi, R. (1983) ‘The Homeric Cyclopes: folktale, tradition, and theme’, TAPA 113, 17–38.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. (1977) Similes in the Homeric poems, Hypomnemata 49, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979) The best of the Achaeans, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Neitzel, H. (1975) Homer-Rezeption bei Hesiod: Interpretation ausgewählter Passagen, Bonn.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. (1961) ‘Guest-gifts and nobodies in Odyssey 9’, Phoenix 15, 125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saïd, S. (1977) ‘Les combats de Zeus et le problème des interpolations dans la Théogonie d'Hésiode’, REG 90, 183–210.Google Scholar
Schwabl, H. (1962) ‘Zu Hesiods Typhonomachie’, Hermes 90, 122–3.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. S. (1979) ‘Theogony 175: why a sickle?’, RSC 27, 177–80.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. (1992) ‘Divine justice in the Odyssey: Poseidon, Cyclops, and Helios’, AJP 113, 489–518.Google Scholar
Simpson, M. (1972) ‘Odyssey 9: symmetry and paradox in Outis’, CJ 68, 22–5.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1949) Hesiod and Aeschylus, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. (1962) ‘Hesiodic and Milesian cosmogonies I’, Phronesis 7, 1–37.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. S. (1984) ‘Workers and drones: labor, idleness and gender definition in Hesiod's beehive’, in Peradotto, J. & Sullivan, J. P. (eds.) Women in the ancient world: the Arethusa papers, Albany, 79–94.Google Scholar
Troxler, H. (1964) Sprache und Wortschatz Hesiods, Zurich.Google Scholar
Tsagarakis, O. (1986) ‘On the priority of Homer and Hesiod’, Emerita 54, 189–202.Google Scholar
van der Valk, M. (1953) ‘A defence of some suspected passages in the Scutum Hesiodi’, Mnemosyne 6, 265–82.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. (1986) ‘Corps obscur, corps éclatant’, in Malamond, C. and Vernant, J. (eds.) Corps des dieux, Paris, 19–45.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. (1991) ‘Mortals and immortals: the body of the divine’, in Zeitlin, F. I. (ed.) Mortals and immortals, Princeton, 27–49.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. (1997) ‘Ulysse en personne’, in Frontisi-Ducroix, F. and Vernant, J., (eds.) Dans l'oeil du miroir, Paris, 11–50.Google Scholar
West, (1966) Hesiod Theogony, Oxford.Google Scholar
White, K. D. (1984) Greek and Roman technology, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Worms, F. (1953) ‘Der Typhoeus-Kampf in Hesiods Theogonie’, Hermes 81, 29–44.Google Scholar
Yoshikazu, S. (1987) ‘The role of the Hecatoncheires in the Theogony’, JCS 35, 12–21.Google Scholar