Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:47:08.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LATE THOUGHTS ON THE TEXT OF SENECA'S TRAGEDIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2017

John G. Fitch*
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, Canada

Abstract

This article elucidates some of the author's editorial decisions in his revised Loeb edition of Seneca's tragedies. It explains his new thinking about the text and interpretation at Phoen 176–7, Med 891–2, Oed 403–4, Ag 481, Thy 1032, HO 1016; offers further defence of the author's interpretation at Phoen 23, Oed 178, 370, 942, Thy 46–8, Oct 47–8, 761; and re-evaluates fourteen further passages in the light of recent scholarship.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Averna, D. (2002) Lucio Anneo Seneca: Hercules Oetaeus, Rome.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. (1988) Senecas Tragödien: sprachliche und stilistische Untersuchungen, Leiden.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. (1999) Seneca, Hercules Furens, Leiden.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. and Somazzi, M. (2009) Repertorium der Konjekturen in der Seneca-Tragödien, Leiden.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1987) Seneca's Phaedra, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (2008) Octavia, Oxford.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (2011) Seneca: Oedipus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Carlsson, G. (1929) Zu Senecas Tragödien: Lesungen und Deutungen, Lund.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (2003) Octavia, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (1987a) Seneca's Hercules Furens: a critical text with introduction and commentary, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (1987b) Seneca's anapaests, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (2002) Seneca: Hercules, Trojan women, Phoenician woman, Medea, Phaedra, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (2004a) Seneca: Oedipus, Agamemnon, Thyestes. [Seneca] Hercules on Oeta, Octavia, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (2004b) Annaeana tragica: notes on the text of Seneca's tragedies, Leiden.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (2004c) ‘Textual notes on Hercules Oetaeus and on Seneca's Agamemnon and Thyestes ’, CQ 54, 240–54.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (2016) ‘Speaking names in Senecan drama’, in Mitsis, P. and Ziogas, I., Wordplay and powerplay in Latin poetry, Berlin, 313–32.Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. (2010) ‘Textkritische Überlegungen zum Corpus der Seneca-Tragödien’, Studia Humaniora Tartuensia 11.A.3.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, T. (1989) Senecas Phoenissen: Einleitung und Kommentar, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. (2007) ‘Envy and akrasia in Seneca's Thyestes ’, CQ 57, 787–91.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1878) L. Annaei Senecae tragoediae, 2 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. (1990) ‘Doctus Seneca’, Mnemosyne 43, 395407.Google Scholar
Müller, G. (1953) ‘Senecas Oedipus als Drama’, Hermes 81, 447–64.Google Scholar
Sluiter, T. H. (1941) L. Annaei Senecae Oedipus, Groningen.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1976) Seneca: Agamemnon, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1985) Seneca's Thyestes, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Töchterle, K. (1994) Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Oedipus, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. (1966) Die Rezitationsdramen Senecas, Meisenheim.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. (1986a) Kritischer Kommentar zu den Tragödien Senecas, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. (1986b) L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae; Incertorum Auctorum Hercules [Oetaeus], Octavia, Oxford.Google Scholar