Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T02:17:45.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perugia and the plots of the Monobiblos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

Brian W. Breed
Brian W. Breed*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is, alas, no secret code or mystical number lurking in the text of Propertius' first book of elegies which, if discovered, could reveal essential truths about the book. Or at least there is none that I can claim to have found. The search for some key to unlock secrets of meaning and authorial design is a well-known phenomenon of the interpretation of Roman poetry books, and Propertius' ‘single book’ has featured prominently in such investigations. The present paper does not put forth a new structural scheme for understanding the Monobiblos or another description of numerical patternings in it, nor does it insist that a true appreciation of the book's ‘architecture’ is essential for understanding its meaning. Instead, it has the goal of considering how the book format affects the experience of reading and the interpretation of this one important work of Roman poetry in light of its generic identity and the literary-historical context in which it was produced.

In particular, I am interested in describing how the book format makes available to readers of the Monobiblos a sense that even in the absence of a single narrative spanning all of the poems of the book it is nevertheless possible to supplement them so that something like a plot or story emerges. I first consider how this sense of a possible plot or plots arises in the reading process, looking also at how some previous influential studies of the Monobiblos have relied upon various ways of construing a story or plot for the book.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 55 , 2009 , pp. 24 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Baker, R. J. (2000) Propertius I, Warminster.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1991) ‘Discordant muses’, PCPS 37, 1–21.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the new Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.) The new Posidippus: a Hellenistic poetry book, Oxford, 320–42.Google Scholar
Breed, B. W. (2006) ‘Time and textuality in the book of the Eclogues’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.) Brill's companion to Greek and Latin pastoral, Leiden, 333–67.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. (1996) ‘The Amores of Propertius: unity and structure in books 2–4’, ICS 21, 87–158.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2006) Sextus Propertius: the Augustan elegist, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1968) ‘The structure of Propertius Book I and some textual consequences’, Phoenix 22, 250–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBrohun, J. B. (2003) Roman Propertius and the reinvention of elegy, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Caro, A. (1995) ‘ Non sum ego qui fueram: le fratture del tempo nelle Elegie di Properzio’, Pan 13, 61–77.Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. (1992) ‘In memoriam Galli: Propertius 1.21’, in Woodman, T. and Powell, J. (eds.) Author and audience in Latin literature, Cambridge, 52–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1980) Sesto Properzio: il primo libra delle Elegie, Florence.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1981) ‘Elegy and literary polemic in Propertius' Monobiblos ’, PLLS 3, 227–42.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000a) ‘The didactic plot’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) Matrices of genre: authors, canons, and society, Cambridge, Mass., 205–19.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000b) ‘First thoughts on closure: problems and prospects’, in Roman constructions: readings in postmodern Latin, Oxford, 239–83.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000c) ‘Second thoughts on closure’, in Roman constructions: readings in postmodern Latin, Oxford, 284–307.Google Scholar
Günther, H.-C. (1997) Quaestiones Propertianae, Mnemosyne Suppl. 169, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (1998) Poetic garlands: Hellenistic epigrams in context, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. (1982) ‘Propertius, Cynthia, and the lunar year’, Latomus 41, 589–96.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: cosmos and imperium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1994) ‘Drink, suspicion, and comedy in Propertius 1.3’, PCPS 40, 18–26.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2007) Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (1998) Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history, and civil war, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1995) ‘Propertius: division, transmission, and the editor's task’, PLLS 8, 165–85.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007a) Cynthia: a companion to the text of Propertius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007b) ‘Propertius, patronage and politics’, BICS 50, 92–128.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1984) ‘Propertius and the unity of the book’, JRS 74, 99–106.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2002) ‘The new Posidippus and Latin poetry’, ZPE 138, 1–10.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2003) ‘The Catullan corpus, Greek epigram, and the poetry of objects’, CQ 53, 206–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2006) Propertius Elegies book IV, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2008) Talking books: readings in Hellenistic and Roman books of poetry, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jal, P. (1963) La guerre civile à Rome: étude littéraire et morale, Paris.Google Scholar
Janan, M. (2001) The politics of desire: Propertius IV, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The arts of love: five studies in the discourse of Roman love elegy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
King, J. K. (1975) ‘Propertius' programmatic poetry and the unity of the Monobiblos ’, CJ 71, 108–24.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (2005) ‘Milestones in the career of Tibullus’, CQ 55, 204–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liveley, G., and Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds.) (2008) Latin elegy and narratology: fragments of story, Columbus.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1980) The Latin love poets: from Catullus to Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998) ‘Propertius and Tibullus: early exchanges’, CQ 48, 519–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1983) ‘Propertius 4.1’, in Collected essays, Oxford, 202–14.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2006) ‘The first book’, in Günther, H.-C. (ed.) Brill's companion to Propertius, Leiden, 219–43.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting uerses: Latin love elegy and the emergence of the real, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. (1975) ‘ Militia amoris and the Roman elegists’, Latomus 34, 59–79.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. E. (1989) ‘Propertius 4.1.87–88 and the division of 4.1’, HSCP 92, 257–72.Google Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1971) ‘The ΣΦΡΑГІΣ of the Monobiblos ’ AJP 92, 464–72.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. (1999) ‘Bodies without names, names without bodies: Propertius 1.21–22’, CJ 94, 143–61.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1997) ‘The erotics of amicitia: readings in Tibullus, Propertius, and Horace’, in Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) Roman sexualities, Princeton, 151–71.Google Scholar
Otis, B. (1965) ‘Propertius' single book’, HSCP 70, 1–44.Google Scholar
Papanghelis, T. D. (1987) Propertius: a Hellenistic poet on love and death, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1976) ‘Propertius 1.22: a poet's self-definition’, QUCC 23, 93–123.Google Scholar
Schulz-Vanheyden, E. (1969) Properz und das griechische Epigramm, Münster.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2000a) ‘Constructing characters in Propertius’, Arethusa 33, 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2000b) ‘Intratextuality: texts, parts, and (w)holes in theory’, in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman textual relations, Oxford, 1–39.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1963) ‘The structure of the Propertian Monobiblos ’, CP 58, 238–9.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1962) ‘Three elegies of Propertius' first book’, CP 57, 73–88.Google Scholar
Spies, A. (1930) Militat omnis amans: Ein Beitrag zur Bildersprache der antiken Erotik, Diss. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (1985) Propertius: ‘love’ and ‘war’-, individual and state under Augustus, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1971) Die römische Liebeselegie als werbende Dichtung, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939) The Roman revolution, Oxford.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, J. (1980) ‘The book-roll and some conventions of the poetic book’, Arethusa 13, 5–42.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988) Roman erotic elegy: love, poetry, and the West, trans. Pellauer, D., Chicago.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980) ‘Horace's liber sermonum: the structure of ambiguity’, Arethusa 13, 59–77.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1996) ‘Poetic baldness and its cure’, MD 36, 73–100.Google Scholar