Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T06:30:23.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Works and nights: Marcus Argentarius (AP 9.161)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

Renaud Gagné  and
Regina Höschele
Renaud Gagné
Affiliation:
Pembroke College, Cambridge
Regina Höschele
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a long and colourful passage from Book 3 of his elegiac poem Leontion, a veritable manifesto of Hellenistic erotics, Hermesianax of Colophon (early third century BC) presents us with an amusing list of poets and their loves (fr. 7 Powell = Athen. XIII 597B). This catalogue features, inter alia, an enamoured Hesiod inspired by a woman. The notion of surly old Hesiod in love with a girl may come as a bit of a surprise to most students of classical philology. After all, one might suppose that the harsh, archaic misogyny of the didactic poet does not bode well for amorous relationships with members of the opposite sex. That makes the statement of Hermesianax (7.21–26) all the more remarkable:

I claim that even Boeotian Hesiod, keeper of all legends, left his home and came out of love to the Heliconian village of the Ascraians. There, wooing Ascraian Ehoie, he suffered many a thing and wrote down in books all his Catalogues, as he hymned her, starting up again and again from the first girl.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 55 , 2009 , pp. 57 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E. and Baumbach, M. (eds.) (2004) Labored in papyrus leaves: perspectives on an epigram collection attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309), Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Aguirre Castro, M. (2005) ‘Expressions of love and sexual union in Hesiod's Catalogue of Women ’, CFC(G) 15, 19–25.Google Scholar
Arighetti, G. (1981) ‘Il misoginismo di Esiodo’, in Misoginia e maschilismo in Grecia e in Roma, Pubblicazioni dell'Istituto di filologia classica e medievale 71, Genova, 27–48.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B. (1973) ‘Early Greece: the origins of the Western attitude toward women’, Arethusa 6, 7–58.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B. (1983) ‘The dream of a world without women: poetics and the circles of order in the Theogony prooemium’, Arethusa 16, 97–116.Google Scholar
Asquith, H. (2005) ‘From genealogy to Catalogue: the Hellenistic adaptation of the Hesiodic catalogue form’, in Hunter (2005a), 266–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baca, A. R. (1971) ‘Ovid's epistle from Sappho to Phaon (Heroides 15)’, TAPA 102, 29–38.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Trampedach, K. (2004) ‘“Winged words’: poetry and divination in Posidippus' Oiônoskopika’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E. and Baumbach, M., 123–60.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1993) ‘The bios-tradition and poets' lives’, in Rosen, R. M. and Farrell, J. (eds.) Nomodeiktes: Greek studies in honor of Martin Ostwald, Ann Arbor, 619–32.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2003) ‘The unruly tongue: Philitas of Cos as scholar and poet’, CPh 98, 330–48.Google Scholar
Birt, T. (1877) ‘Animadversiones ad Ovidii heroidum epistulas’, RhM 32, 388–432.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. (2008) Greek religion and culture, the Bible and the ancient Near East, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caduff, G. A. (1986) Antike Sintflutsagen, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. (1979) Tibullus: a Hellenistic poet at Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1993) The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (1979) La famiglia di Pandora: analisi filologica dei miti di Pandora e Prometeo nella tradizione esiodea, Florence.Google Scholar
Caspers, C. L. (2006) ‘The loves of the poets: allusions in Hermesianax Fr. 7 Powell’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Beyond the canon, Hellenistica Groningana II, Leuven, 21–42.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (1990) ‘Hellenistic imitations of Hesiod, Catalogue of Women, fr. 1.6–7 M&W’, QUCC 65, 129–40.Google Scholar
Dagradi, S. (1999) ‘La problematizzazione della sessualità nelle opere di Esiodo’, A&R 44, 121–9.Google Scholar
D'Alessio, G. B. (2005) ‘Ordered from the Catalogue: Pindar, Bacchylides, and Hesiodic genealogical poetry’, in Hunter, R. (ed.) (2005a), 217–38.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1975) P. Ovidius Naso: Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon, Munich.Google Scholar
duBois, P. (1992) ‘Eros and the woman’, Ramus 21, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and innovation in Hellenistic poetry , Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. (2005) ‘Or such as Ovid's Metamorphoses…’, in Hunter, (ed.) (2005a), 299–319.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1998) ‘Genealogical thinking, Hesiod's Catalogue, and the creation of the Hellenes’, PCPhS 44, 1–19.Google Scholar
Fredricksmeyer, E. A. (1965) ‘Horace's Ode to Pyrrha (Carm. 1.5)’, CPh 60, 180–5.Google Scholar
Geisau, H. v. (1963) ‘Pyrrha. 8’, RE 24, Stuttgart, col. 79.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (1998) Poetic garlands: Hellenistic epigrams in context, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (ed.) (2005) The new Posidippus: a Hellenistic poetry book, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (ed.) (2007) ‘The paradox of amatory epigram’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S. (eds.) Brill's Companion to Hellenistic Epigram, Leiden, 313–32.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2005) ‘The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women and Latin poetry’, in Hunter, (ed.) (2005a) 287–98.Google Scholar
Hendry, M. (1991a) ‘A Hermetic pun in Marcus Argentarius XII G–P (A.P. 5.127)’, Hermes 119, 497.Google Scholar
Hendry, M. (1991b) ‘Frigidus Lusus: Marcus Argentarius XXXIV Gow-Page (Anth. Pal. II.320)’, GRBS 32, 197–201.Google Scholar
Hendry, M. (1997) ‘An abysmal pun: Marcus Argentarius VI G–P (A.P. 5.104)’, Mnemosyne 50, 325–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschberger, M. (2004) Gynaikōn Katalogos und Megalai Ēhoiai: ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten zweier hesiodeischer Epen, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. (2006) Verrückt nach Frauen. Der Epigrammatiker Rufin, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. and Konstan, D. (in preparation) ‘The erotic world of Marcus Argentarius’.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (ed.) (2005a) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. (ed.) (2005b) ‘The Hesiodic Catalogue and Hellenistic poetry’, in Hunter, (ed.) (2005a), 239–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassel, R. and Austin, C. (2001) Poetae comici Graeci, vol. 1, Berlin.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1993) ‘Philetas and Roman poetry’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 7, 61–83.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1995) Ouid: Heroides. Select Epistles, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kuchenmüller, G. (1928) Philetae Coi reliquiae, Bern.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. (1988) ‘Pandora ou la terrifiante femininité’, Kernos I, 49–62.Google Scholar
Lidov, J. B. (2002) ‘Sappho, Herodotus, and the Hetaira ’, CPh 97, 203–37.Google Scholar
Lobel, E. (1959), ‘[P.Oxy.] 2427. Epicharmus, Plays’, in Lobel, E., The Oxyrhynchus Papyri 25, London, 2–31.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1978) ‘Sur la race des femmes et quelques-unes de ses tribus’, Arethusa II, 43–87.Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. (2004) ‘ Dignae Ioue irae: Ovids Deucalion und Pyrrha in Juvenals erster Satire’, Latomus 63, 892–904.Google Scholar
Magno, P. (1979–1980) ‘La Leucadia di Turpilio e Ovidio, Heroides XV, attraverso i loro modelli greci’, Sileno 5–6, 81–92.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. (1968) ‘Les papyrus d'Hésiode et la géographie mythologique de la Grèce’, Chronique d'Égypte 85, 133–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, G. (1995) ‘Reflecting Sappho’, BICS 40, 15–38 Google Scholar
[reprinted in Greene, E. (ed.) (1996) Re-reading Sappho: reception and transmission, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 11–35].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murgia, C. E. (1985) ‘Imitation and authenticity in Ovid's Metamorphoses 1.477 and Heroides 15’, AJP 106, 456–74.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A commentary on Horace: odes, Book 1, Oxford.Google Scholar
Palumbo Stracca, B. M. (1993–1994) ‘Differenze dialettali e stilistiche nella storia dell' epigramma greco’, in Bolognesi, G. and Pisani, V. (eds.) Linguistica e filologia. Atti del VII conuegno internazionale di linguistici, Brescia, 429–34.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1993) ‘Sappho schoolmistress’, TAPA 123, 309–51Google Scholar
[reprinted in Greene, E. (ed.) (1996) Re-reading Sappho: reception and transmission, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 146–83].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastorino, A. (1955) ‘Turpilio fr. 213 R 3 ’, Maia 7, 43–5.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. (1963) ‘Horace as a love poet: a reading of Odes 1.5’, Arion 2, 59–77.Google Scholar
Reinsch-Werner, H. (1976) Callimachus Hesiodicus: Die Rezeption der hesiodischen Dichtung durch Kallimachos uon Kyrene, Berlin.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (1999) ‘Epistolary fictions: authorial identity in Heroides 15’, PCPhS 45, 109–35.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (1996) ‘Sabinus, the Heroides and the poet-nightingale: some observations on the authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus ’, CQ 46, 207–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudhardt, J. (1986) ‘Pandora: Hésiode et les femmes’, MH 43, 231–46.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. (2000) ‘Formulas, voice, and death in Ehoie-Poetry, the Hesiodic Gunaikon Katalogos, and the Odysseian Nekuia’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) Matrices of genre: authors, canons, and society, Cambridge, Mass., 81–96.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2005) ‘Posidippus on weather signs and the tradition of didactic poetry’, in Gutzwiller, 164–82.Google Scholar
Small, S.G. (1951) ‘Marcus Argentarius: a poet of the Greek anthology’, YCS 12, 65–145.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2004) ‘Elusive stones: reading Posidippus' Lithika through technical writing on stones’, in B. Acosta-Hughes, E. Kosmetatou and M. Baumbach, 105–17.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1981) ‘The Authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV)’, HSCP 85, 133–53.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (2006) Pandora, la première femme, Paris.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1985) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: its nature, structure, origin, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, F. A. (1932) A history of later Greek literature from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C. to the death of Justinian in 565 A.D., London.Google Scholar
Yatromanolakis, D. (2007) Sappho in the making: the early reception, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar