Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T05:29:33.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The king and eye: the rule of the father in Greek tragedy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Mark Griffith
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Extract

Athenian tragedy is a ‘representation of élite practice …’, focusing primarily on the actions of ‘people superior to us’ in their moral and social station. Although it is debatable exactly what Aristotle means by σπουδαῖος in the context of a tragic plot, and to what degree his theory of tragedy is wedded to a belief in the social, as well as ethical, ‘superiority’ of the leading characters, there is no denying the obvious fact that the surviving plays draw a sharp line between the ‘serious’ (or ‘better kind of’) characters, whose decisions, actions, and sufferings form the core (or ‘soul’) of the plot, and the minor characters (‘us’) who form the socio-political context for those decisions and actions, and whose attitudes and desires tend to be affected by, but never to cause or determine, the key crises and reversals of that plot. The ‘serious’ characters are invariably royal or noble, while the minor characters are of markedly lower status. Thus, while it may be correct to describe Athenian tragedy as ‘polyphonic’ and ‘egalitarian’ in its form, in so far as it gives generous opportunities for female, servile, foreign, and lower-class voices to be heard, along with – and even in opposition to – the voices of the aristocratic main characters, the trajectory of the plots, along with the costumes and spatial arrangements of the theatre itself, nonetheless tend to reassert very strongly the differences between high and low, ‘superior’ and ordinary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adelman, J. (1992) Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare's plays (New York).Google Scholar
Alexiou, M. (1974) The ritual lament in Greek tradition (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Arnheim, M. T. W. (1977) Aristocracy in Greek society (London).Google Scholar
Bakewell, G. W. (1998) ‘Persae 374–83: Persians, Greeks, and ΠΕΙΘΑΡΧΩΙ ΦΡΕΝΙ’, CP 93, 232–6.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination, ed. Holquist, M. (Austin).Google Scholar
Barber, C. L. & Wheeler, R. (1986) The whole journey: Shakespeare's power of development (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, L. (1988) Eschilo: I Persiani (Milan 1988).Google Scholar
Belsey, C. (1985) The subject of tragedy: identity and difference in Renaissance drama (London).Google Scholar
Bennett, S. (1997) Theatre audiences (2nd ed., New York).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The logic of practice (1980; Eng. tr. Stanford, ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadhead, H. D. (1960) The Persae of Aeschylus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1965) ‘ΓΟΗΣ: zum griechischen “Shamanismus”’, RhMus 105 (1962) 3655.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1985) Greek Religion (tr. Raffan, J., Oxford).Google Scholar
Butler, J. P. (1993) Bodies that matter (New York).Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1990) Thesée et l'imaginaire athenien: legende et culte en Grèce antique (Paris).Google Scholar
Caldwell, R. S. (1970) ‘The pattern of Aeschylean tragedy’, TAPA 101, 7794.Google Scholar
Caldwell, R. S. (1990) ‘The psychoanalytic interpretation of Greek myth’, in Edmunds, A. L., ed., Approaches to Greek myth (Baltimore) 342–89.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. & Kuhrt, A., eds. (1983) Images of women in antiquity (London).Google Scholar
Campbell, J. K. (1964) Honour, family, and patronage (Oxford).Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (1997) ‘“Deep plays”: theatre as process in Greek civic life’, in Easterling, P. E., ed., Cambridge Companion to Greek tragedy (Cambridge) 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citti, V. (1962) Il linguaggio religioso e liturgico nelle tragedie di Eschilo (Bologna).Google Scholar
Clover, C. J. (1992) Men, women, and chainsaws (Princeton).Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (1991) Law, sexuality, and society (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, W. R. (1989) ‘City Dionysia and Athenian democracy’, C&M 40, 732.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. (1996) ‘Civic society, Dionysiac festival, and the Athenian democracy’, in Ober, & Hedrick, , eds, Demokratia (Princeton) 217–26.Google Scholar
Crane, G. (1993) ‘The politics of consumption and generosity in the Carpet Scene of Agamemnon’, CP 88, 117–36.Google Scholar
Crane, G. (1996) ‘The prosperity of tyrants: Bacchylides, Herodotus, and the contest for legitimacy’, Arethusa 29, 5785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E., & Slater, W. J., eds. (1995) The context of ancient drama (Ann Arbor).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. K. (1984) Wealth and the power of wealth in classical Athens (Salem, N.H.).Google Scholar
De Lauretis, T. (1987) Technologies of gender (Bloomington).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marinis, M. (1987) ‘Dramaturgy of the spectator’, The Drama Review 31.2, 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, G. (1976) Dreams in Greek tragedy (London).Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1951) The Greeks and the irrational (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollimore, J. & Sinfield, A. (1994) Political Shakespeare (2nd ed., Cornell).Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (1990) ‘The King and I in Uncle Tom's Cabin’, Cinema Journal 29, 5265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donlan, W. 1980 The aristocratic ideal in ancient Greece: attitudes of superiority from Homer to the end of the fifth century B.C. (Lawrence).Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. C. (1993) ‘It's murder to found a colony’, in Dougherty, & Kurke, L. V., eds. Cultural poetics in archaic Greece (Cambridge) 178–98.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1974) Greek popular morality in the time of Plato and Aristotle (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1978) Greek homosexuality (New York).Google Scholar
du Bois, P. (1988) Sowing the body (Chicago).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. E. (1984) ‘Kings in Greek tragedy’, in Coy, J. and de Hoz, J., eds., Estudios sobre los generos literarios II (Salamanca) 3345.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. ed., (1997) The Cambridge Companion to Greek tragedy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. E. (1997a) ‘Constructing the heroic’, in Pelling, , ed., 2137.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, V. (1954) Sophocles and Pericles (Oxford).Google Scholar
Elam, K. (1980) The semiotics of theatre and drama (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J. (1982) Visible fictions (London).Google Scholar
Erickson, P. (1985) Patriarchal structures in Shakespeare's drama (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Euben, J. P., ed., (1986) Greek tragedy and political theory (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Flugel, J. C. (1930) The psychology of clothes (London).Google Scholar
Foley, H. (1992) ‘The politics of tragic lamentation’, in Sommerstein, A. et al. , eds., Tragedy, comedy and the polls (Bari) 101–43.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1985) The use of pleasure (= The history of sexuality, vol. 2; Eng. tr. New York).Google Scholar
Foxhall, L. (1989) ‘Household, gender, and property in Classical Athens’, CQ 39, 2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, L. (1995) Identification papers (New York).Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. (1974) Aeschylean drama (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Geddes, A. G. (1987) ‘Rags and riches: the costume of Athenian men in the 5th c.’, CQ 37, 307–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georges, P. (1994) Barbarian Asia and the Greek experience (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Goheen, R. F. (1951) The imagery of Sophocles' Antigone (Princeton).Google Scholar
Golden, M. (1990) Children and childhood in classical Athens (Baltimore).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1986) Reading Greek tragedy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1988) ‘Battle narrative and politics in Aeschylus' PersaeJHS 108, 189–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1990) ‘The Great Dionysia and civic ideology’, in Winkler, J. J. & Zeitlin, F. I., eds., Nothing to do with Dionysos? (Princeton) 97129.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1997) ‘The audience of Athenian tragedy’, in Easterling, , ed., 5468.Google Scholar
Gould, J. (1996) ‘Tragedy and collective experience’, in Silk, M. S., ed., Tragedy and the tragic (London) 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A. (1979) The tragic effect (1969; Eng. tr. Sheridan, A., Cambridge).Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1995) ‘Brilliant dynasts: power and politics in the Oresteia’, CA 14, 62129.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. ed., (1998) Sophocles: Antigone (Cambridge) [forthcoming].Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1989) Inventing the barbarian (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1993) ‘Asia unmanned: images of victory in classical Athens’, in Rich, J. & Shipley, G. (eds.) War and society in the Greek world (London) 107–33.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1996) Aeschylus: Persians (Warminster).Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1997) ‘The sociology of Athenian tragedy’, in Easterling, , ed., 93126.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. E. (1986) Aristotle's Poetics (London).Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. (1996) ‘Hoplites into democrats: the changing ideology of Athenian infantry’, in Ober, & Hedrick, , eds., 289312.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. R. W. (19681971) The law of Athens (2 vols, Oxford).Google Scholar
Headlam, W. (1902) ‘Ghost-raising, magic, and the underworld’, CR 16, 5261.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1987) The poetics of Greek tragedy (London).Google Scholar
Henry, M. (1995) Prisoner of history (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herington, C. J. (1985) Poetry into tragedy (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Holst-Warhaft, G. (1992) Dangerous voices (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, S. (1983) The family, women, and death (London 1983).Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1978) The act of reading (Baltimore).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, H. R. (1974) ‘Levels of identification of hero and audience’, New Literary History 5.2, 283317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, C. (1981) Man's estate: masculine identity in Shakespeare (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamps, O., ed., (1995) Materialist Shakespeare (New York).Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. (1995) ‘“Getting to know you”: travel, gender, and the politics of representation in Anna and the King of Siam and The King and I’, in De La Campa, R., Kaplan, E. A., & Sprinker, M., eds., Late imperial culture (London) 3352.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. (1988) Ritual, politics, and power (New Haven).Google Scholar
King, H. (1983) ‘Bound to bleed’, in Cameron, and Kuhrt, , eds., 109–27.Google Scholar
Kinser, S. (1990) Carnival American style (Chicago).Google Scholar
Knox, B. M. W. (1964) The heroic temper (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V. (1991) The traffic in praise (Ithaca).Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V. (1992) ‘The politics of habrosyne’, CA 11, 91120.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V. (1999) Coins, bodies, games, and gold: the politics of meaning in archaic Greece (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, J. (1977) Ecrits: a selection (Eng. tr., New York).Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1992) The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1959–1960: the seminar of Jacques Lacan Book VII, ed. Miller, J. A. (tr. Porter, D., New York).Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. (1968) The family in classical Greece (Cornell).Google Scholar
Lada, I. (1993) ‘“Empathic understanding”: emotion and cognition in classical dramatic audience-response’, PCPS 39, 94140.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H., & Wilson, N. G. (1990) Sophoclea (Oxford).Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1986) The invention of Athens: the funeral oration … (Eng. tr., Harvard).Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1995) The experiences of Tiresias: the feminine and the Greek man (Eng. tr., Princeton).Google Scholar
Lott, E. (1993) Love and theft: blackface, minstrelsy and the American working class (Oxford).Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W., ed., (1968) Aristotle: The poetics (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, J. (1992) ‘Dynasty and family in the Athenian city state’, CQ 42, 2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, G. (1993) Romance and the ‘yellow peril’: race, sex and discursive strategies in Hollywood fiction (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Meijering, R. (1987) Literary and rhetorical theories in Greek scholia (Groningen).Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. (1997) Athens and Persia in the fifth century B.C.: a study in cultural receptivity (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Monsacré, H. (1984) Les Larmes d'Achille: le héros, la femme et la souffranee dans la poésie d'Homère (Paris).Google Scholar
Montrose, L. (1980) ‘The purpose of playing: reflexions on a Shakespearean anthropology’, Helios 7, 5174.Google Scholar
Mullaney, S. (1988) The place of the stage: license, play and power in Renaissance England (Chicago).Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1989) Mass and élite in democratic Athens (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, J., & Hedrick, C., eds., (1996) Demokratia (Princeton).Google Scholar
Ober, J., & Strauss, B., (1990) ‘Drama, political rhetoric, and the discourse of Athenian democracy’, in Winkler, & Zeitlin, , eds., 237–70.Google Scholar
Orgel, S. (1975) The illusion of power: political theatre in the English Renaissance (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paduano, G. (1978) Sui Persiani di Eschilo. Problemi di focalizzazione drammatica (Rome).Google Scholar
Paduano, G. (1986) ‘Drammaturgie della paternita’. SIFC 3.4, 172–82.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R., ed., (1997) Greek tragedy and the historian (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R., ed., (1997) ‘Aeschylus' Persians and the historian’, in Pelling, , ed., 117.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. (1966) The political background of Aeschylean tragedy (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. (1966a) ‘Creon and Herodotus’, TAPA 97, 359–71.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. (1986) ‘Polis and monarch in early Greek tragedy’, in Euben, , ed., 76100.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. (1993) ‘ϰατʾ ἀϱχῆς γὰϱ ϕιλαίτιος λεώς: the concept of leadership in Aeschylus’, in Sommerstein, A. et al. , eds., 5579.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (1989) ‘Contemporary perceptions of democracy in fifth-century Athens’, C&M 40, 3370..Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (1996) ‘Equalities and inequalities in Athenian democracy’, in Ober, & Hedrick, , eds., 139–73.Google Scholar
Reiner, E. (1938) Die rituelle Totenklage der Griechen (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. (1979) ‘The hoplite as citizen’, AC 48, 508–48.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. T. (1994) Athens on trial: the antidemocratic tradition in Western thought (Princeton).Google Scholar
Rohdich, H. (1980) Antigone – Beitrag zu einer Theorie des sophokleischen Helden (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Rose, P. (1992) Sons of the gods, children of earth: ideology and literary form in ancient Greece (Ithaca).Google Scholar
Said, E. (1978) Orientalism (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Said, S. (1981) ‘Darius et Xerxes dans les Perses d'Eschyle’, Ktema 6, 1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaps, D. M. (1979) The economic rights of women in classical Greece (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (1970) The nature of sympathy (Eng. tr., London).Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1994) Reciprocity and ritual: Homer and tragedy in the developing city-state (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. P. (1986) Interpreting Greek tragedy (Cornell).Google Scholar
Silk, M. S., ed., (1996) Tragedy and the tragic (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, K. (1983) The subject of semiotics (Oxford).Google Scholar
Silverman, K. (1992) Male subjectivity at the margins (New York).Google Scholar
Sinclair, R. K. (1988) Democracy and participation in Athens (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. R. (1968) The glory of Hera (Boston).Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. et al. , eds., (1993) Tragedy, comedy, and the polls (Bari).Google Scholar
Sorum, C. E. (19811982) ‘The family in Sophocles' Antigone and Electro’, CW 75, 201–11.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1979) Theseus as son and stepson. A tentative illustration of the Greek mythological mentality (London).Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1989Assumptions and the creation of meaning: reading Sophocles' Antigone’, JHS 109, 134–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1985) ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. (eds.) Marxism and the interpretation of cultures (Urbana), 271313.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, P. & White, A. (1986) The politics and poetics of transgression (Cornell).Google Scholar
Strauss, B. (1993) Fathers and sons in Athens (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, B. (1996) ‘The Athenian trireme, school of democracy’, in Ober, & Hedrick, , eds., 313–25.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. P. (1977) The stagecraft of Aeschylus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (1989) Xenophon's imperial fiction (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. (1980) ‘Xerxes' rags’, AJP 101, 260–82.Google Scholar
Travis, R. M. (1996) Allegorical fantasy and the chorus in Sophocles' Oedipus Coloneus (PhD diss., Berkeley).Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1983) Myth and Thought among the Greeks (1965; Eng. tr. London).Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P., & Vidal-Naquet, P. (1981) Tragedy and myth in ancient Greece (1965; Eng. tr. Lloyd, J., Brighton).Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1992) Ancient Greek music (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (1979) Modern tragedy (2nd ed., London).Google Scholar
Wilson, G. (1985) The psychology of the performing arts (London).Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J., and Zeitlin, F. I., eds., (1990) Nothing to do with Dionysos? (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1971) Playing and reality (London).Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1980) Sophocles: an interpretation (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1983) Studies in Aeschylus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Wohl, V. J. (1998) Intimate commerce: exchange, gender, and subjectivity in Greek tragedy (Austin).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995) The mask of Socrates (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1986) ‘Thebes: theatre of self and society in Athenian drama’, in Euben, , ed., 101–41.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1996) Playing the other (Chicago).Google Scholar