^{page 11 note 1} The insertion of the n in Monse is uncommon but not unique, for monsen (acc.) is found at Ac. vi 11 in the Fleury Palimpsest (h); cf. also Rönsch 458. The form Monse (nom.) occurs in the 'Assumption' (xi 2, 17; xii 2), and is frequent in the vocative (e.g. Jubilees xlviii 22Google Scholar); Monses occurs in the vocative Jub. xxx 11Google Scholar, but never in the nominative. Is it possible that the underlying Greek was Μωσῆ, a transliteration of the Semitic Môshê?

^{page 12 note 1} Comp. the various recensions of the Acts of Judas Thomas, the longer forms of which are the more original.