Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T18:25:39.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subject, topic, given and salient: sentence-beginnings in Latin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

F. Jones
F. Jones
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper summarises the results of an investigation into sentence-beginnings made as part of an attempt to find an approach to word order which would be effective in revealing linguistic continuity as well as coping with the complexity of facts. Its point of origin is the intuition that for a native speaker the process of understanding what is said or written ought to be, at least within reasonable limits, both continuous and in some way in keeping with the order in which the utterance or text is presented.

Utterances are linear and temporal, and the ear passes what it receives to the brain in a sequential order that matches the auditory stimulus itself, a fact reflected in the way we write and read; it would be anomalous (though by no means impossible within certian limitations) if the brain were to process the incoming material in some other order. It is therefore worth considering the order in which discourse elements are represented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 37 , 1992 , pp. 81 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, J. N.Indogermanische Forschungen 81 (1976) 70–99Google Scholar
Baldi, P. in Pinkster, H. (ed.), Latin linguistics and linguistic theory (1983) 11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolkestein, A. M. in Bolkestein, A. M. et al. , Predication and expression in functional grammar (1981) 63–112Google Scholar
Brown, G. and Yule, G.Discourse analysis (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, P. W.Mehler, J. and Thomas, G. in d'Arcais, G. B. Flores and Levelt, W. J. M. (edd.), Advances in psycholinguistics (1970) 61–75Google Scholar
Carroll, J. M.Tanenhaus, M. K. and Bever, T. G. in Levelt, W. J. M. and d'Arcais, G. B. Flores (edd.), Studies in the perception of language (1978) 187–218Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. in Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic (1976) 27–55Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. and Clark, H. H.Psychology and language (1977)Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Haviland, S. E. in Freedle, R. O. (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (1977) 1–40Google Scholar
Collinge, N. E.PCPS 34 (1988) 1–13Google Scholar
Davison, A.Language 60 (1984) 797–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, J. R. in Pinkster, H. (ed.), Latin linguistics and linguistic theory (1983) 131–44 in Calboli, G. (ed.), Subordination and other topics in Latin (1989) 521–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, K. J.Greek word order (1960)Google Scholar
Eikmeyer, H.-J. in Petöfi, J. S. (ed.), Text and discourse constitution (1988) 215–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elerick, C. in Calboli, G. (ed.), Subordination and other topics in Latin (1989) 559–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D.PCPS 36 (1990) 42–63Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E.Kolon und Satz (Nachr. Gött. Ges. d. Wiss., 1932, 197–213) = Kleine Beiträge zur Klassichen Philologie (1964) I 73–92Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E.Kolon und Satz II (Nachr. Gött. Ges. d. Wiss., 1933, 319–54) supplemented = Kleine Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie (1964) I 93–139Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E.Noch einmal Kolon und Satz. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akad. d. Wiss., Phil.-hist. Klasse, Heft 2 (1965)Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E.Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos (1968)Google Scholar
Frederiksen, C. H. in Freedle, R. O. (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (1977) 57–87Google Scholar
Garnham, A.Psycholinguistics: central topics (1985)Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. in Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language (1963) 73–113Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (edd.), Speech acts. Syntax and semantics 3 (1975) 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
in Cole, P. (ed.), Radical pragmatics (1978) 113–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. in Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (edd.), Sociolinguistics (1972) 203ff.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N.The colometry of Latin prose (1985)Google Scholar
Hägg, T.Eranos 69 (1971) 25f.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. in Lyons, J. (ed.), New horizons in linguistics (1970) 140–65Google Scholar
Harweg, R. in Petöfi, J. S. (ed.), Text and discourse constitution (1988) 26–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helander, H.The noun ‘victoria’ as subect (1982)Google Scholar
Hetzron, R. in Li, C. N. (ed.), Word order and word order change (1975) 346–88Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. A.Language 60 (1984) 703–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtig, R. in Freedle, R. O. (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (1977) 89–106Google Scholar
Keenan, E. O. and Schieffelin, B. B. in Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic (1976) 338–84Google Scholar
Laughton, E.CQ 10 (1960) 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.Pragmatics (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.Language 53 (1977) 152–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.Tyler, L. K. and Seidenberg, M. in Levelt, W. J. M. and Flores d'Arcais, G. B. (edd.), Studies in the perception of langauge (1978) 219–46Google Scholar
Nichols, J. and Woodbury, A. C. in Nichols, J. and Woodbury, A. C. (edd.), Grammar inside and outside the clause (1985) 1–14Google Scholar
O'Connell, D. C. in Rosenberg, S. (ed.), Sentence production (1977) 307–313Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. in Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (edd.), Semantics (1971) 497–529Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. and Bock, J. K. in Rosenberg, S. (ed.), Sentence production (1977) 89–140Google Scholar
Panhuis, D. G. J. in Pinkster, H. (ed.), Latin linguistics and linguistic theory (1983) 142ffGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, H. in Wright, R. (ed.), Latin and the Romance Languages in the early Middle Ages (1990a) 69ffGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, H. in Wright, R. (ed.), Latin syntax and semantics (1990b)Google Scholar
Pyne, J. in Levelt, W. J. M. and d'Arcais, C. B. Flores (edd.), Studies in the perception of language (1978) 109–27Google Scholar
Scinto, L. F. M. in Fine, J. and Freedle, R. O. (edd.), Development issues in discourse (1983) 225–68Google Scholar
Siewierska, A.Word order rules (1988)Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.Relevance: communication and cognition (1986)Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S.Basic word order: functional principles (1986)Google Scholar
Walker, A. T.CJ 13 (1918) 644–57Google Scholar
Weil, H.De l'ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Question de grammaire générale (1844)Google Scholar