¹ [Printed in full in the Transaction of the Cambridge Philological Society, Vol. III. (Part III.), pp. 154 sqq.]

² This is the express explanation of the scholiast, twice repeated. Bonitz, who attempts to reverse the relations by dividing the line at the caesura, is compelled (a) to restrict the remark to lines with feminine ćaesura; (b) to make Aristotle commit a ὕστερον πρότερον, as he thus states yhe second half and the larger number first.

³ ὲπιδέξιος and ἐνδέξιος being partically identical, are taken together for convenience.