Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T09:22:23.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2. Married1 men among the English higher Clergy, 1066–1200

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2011

C. N. L. Brooke
C. N. L. Brooke
Affiliation:
Fellow of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Communications
Information
Cambridge Historical Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , 1956 , pp. 187 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 The Textus Roffensis contains several other cases of respectably married priests, but none definitely of the higher clergy. We should probably add to this list Erchemer, dean of Hereford (occurs c. 1107–15, Balliol College, MS. 271, f. 93 V.), who seems to have been father to Ranulph son of Erchemer, canon of Hereford. Ranulph occurs as canon in the 1140's (Round, J. H., Calendar of Documents preserved in France (London, 1899)Google Scholar, no. 1142; Capes, W. W., Charters and Records of Hereford Cathedral (Hereford, 1908), p. 12)Google Scholar and was the father of another Ranulph, also a canon of Hereford (cf. ibid. pp. 24, 32).

3 I have excluded rural deans from this list, since they were properly of the lower clergy: for a good example of a rural dean who was also a family man in the mid-twelfth century, see Cartulary of Darley Abbey, ed. Darlington, R. R., I (Kendal, 1945), pp. xxxv ff.Google Scholar