Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T09:19:39.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collateral challenge defended or no smoke without fine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1998

Get access

Abstract

THE imposition of a £10 fine for violating a no-smoking ban on a train to Brighton is an unlikely start for a decision of major constitutional importance–even when the incendiary incident occurred, as here, on 5 November. Nevertheless, Boddington v. British Transport Police [1998] 2 W.L.R. 639 has provided the House of Lords with the opportunity to deliver a strong affirmation of a defendant's right to raise the validity of the administrative action which has resulted in his prosecution as a defence in criminal proceedings.

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
© The Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors, 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)