Contract—Mistake as to Existence of Agreement held to be Mistake or Fact, not of Law—Company Held Entitled to Rely on Mistake by One Agent as to Facts Known to Another Agent—Statute of Limitations Held to Run from Time of Mistaken Payment.

H. A. H.

doi:10.1017/S000819730012937X

Contract—Mistake as to Existence of Agreement held to be Mistake or Fact, not of Law—Company Held Entitled to Rely on Mistake by One Agent as to Facts Known to Another Agent—Statute of Limitations Held to Run from Time of Mistaken Payment.

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009

H. A. H.

Article contents

Abstract

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Notes on Recent Cases
Information: The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , November 1938 , pp. 428 - 429

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730012937X [Opens in a new window]

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article contents

Contract—Mistake as to Existence of Agreement held to be Mistake or Fact, not of Law—Company Held Entitled to Rely on Mistake by One Agent as to Facts Known to Another Agent—Statute of Limitations Held to Run from Time of Mistaken Payment.

Abstract

Access options

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests