Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Bredenoord, A.L.
Pennings, G.
and
de Wert, G.
2008.
Ooplasmic and nuclear transfer to prevent mitochondrial DNA disorders: conceptual and normative issues.
Human Reproduction Update,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 6,
p.
669.
Mertes, Heidi
and
Pennings, Guido
2009.
Stem Cells in Human Reproduction.
p.
14.
Mertes, Heidi
and
Pennings, Guido
2009.
Stem Cells in Human Reproduction.
p.
14.
Mertes, Heidi
and
Pennings, Guido
2010.
Ethical Aspects of the Use of Stem Cell Derived Gametes for Reproduction.
Health Care Analysis,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
267.
Knaplund, Kristine S.
2012.
What's Blood Got To Do With It? Determining Parentage for ART Children Born Overseas.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Mertes, Heidi
and
Pennings, Guido
2013.
Stem Cells in Reproductive Medicine.
p.
93.
2013.
Stem Cells in Reproductive Medicine.
p.
63.
McCandless, Julie
and
Sheldon, Sally
2014.
Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction.
p.
61.
Hendriks, Saskia
Dancet, Eline A.F.
van Pelt, Ans M.M.
Hamer, Geert
and
Repping, Sjoerd
2015.
Artificial gametes: a systematic review of biological progress towards clinical application.
Human Reproduction Update,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
285.
Hendriks, Saskia
Dondorp, Wybo
de Wert, Guido
Hamer, Geert
Repping, Sjoerd
and
Dancet, Eline A.F.
2015.
Potential consequences of clinical application of artificial gametes: a systematic review of stakeholder views.
Human Reproduction Update,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
297.
Segers, Seppe
Mertes, Heidi
Pennings, Guido
de Wert, Guido
and
Dondorp, Wybo
2017.
Using stem cell-derived gametes for same-sex reproduction: an alternative scenario.
Journal of Medical Ethics,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 10,
p.
688.
Segers, Seppe
Mertes, Heidi
de Wert, Guido
Dondorp, Wybo
and
Pennings, Guido
2017.
Balancing Ethical Pros and Cons of Stem Cell Derived Gametes.
Annals of Biomedical Engineering,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 7,
p.
1620.
Piotrowska, Monika
2018.
Is ‘Assisted Reproduction’ Reproduction?.
The Philosophical Quarterly,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 270,
p.
138.
Dimond, Rebecca
and
Stephens, Neil
2018.
Three persons, three genetic contributors, three parents: Mitochondrial donation, genetic parenting and the immutable grammar of the ‘three x x’.
Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 3,
p.
240.
Dimond, Rebecca
2018.
Clinical Ethics At the Crossroads of Genetic and Reproductive Technologies.
p.
31.
Simopoulou, Mara
Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos
Tsioulou, Petroula
Rapani, Anna
Giannelou, Polina
Kiriakopoulos, Nikolaos
Pantou, Agni
Vlahos, Nikolaos
Anifandis, George
Bolaris, Stamatis
Pantos, Konstantinos
and
Koutsilieris, Michael
2019.
What will the future hold for artificial organs in the service of assisted reproduction: prospects and considerations.
Frontiers of Medicine,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 6,
p.
627.
PIOTROWSKA, MONIKA
2019.
Why is an Egg Donor a Genetic Parent, but not a Mitochondrial Donor?.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
488.
Cutas, Daniela
and
Smajdor, Anna
2020.
Assistierte Reproduktion mit Hilfe Dritter.
p.
171.
Dimond, Rebecca
2023.
Clinical Ethics At the Crossroads of Genetic and Reproductive Technologies.
p.
33.
Palacios-González, César
2023.
Genealogical obscurement: mitochondrial replacement techniques and genealogical research.
Journal of Medical Ethics,
p.
jme-2022-108659.