Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:30:28.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dutch Euthanasia: Background, Practice, and Present Justifications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

G. K. Kimsma  and
E. Van Leeuwen
G. K. Kimsma
Affiliation:
Free University of Amsterdam
E. Van Leeuwen
Affiliation:
Medicine of the Free University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dutch developments on euthanasia have drawn much attention over the years. Defenders and opponents have been telling very different stories about the practice of euthanasia and the frequency of cases, and the Dutch government has been struggling with the legal and moral problems involved. Concern about the procedures followed by physicians as well as questions on the “real” figures led the government to decide to organize an epidemiological study on the extent and the decision making. The results of the study were published in November 1991 (The End of Life in Medical Practice, 1991). Interpretation of the data may lead to a final settlement of the debate on euthanasia and has inevitably led to a revival of the moral debate of the 1970s. For the moment it has been decided that euthanasia will remain officially illegal under the Penal Code. However, in cases where euthanasia does occur, Attorneys General will continue to check the procedures followed by physicians to ensure no abuses have occurred and to safeguard physicians against prosecution. In this contribution, we discuss the development and intertwinement of legal, medical, and moral aspects of euthanasia in The Netherlands and the effects of the empirical studies of 1991, both on definitions and procedures for medical decisions at the end of life(MDEL)

Type
Special Section: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Murder or Mercy?
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Winter 1993 , pp. 19 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

page 31 note1. Lindeboom, Ga. Euthanasie. Predikant en Dokter. 1932.Google Scholar

page 31 note2. Lindeboom, GA. Euthanasie, euthanasiasme. Nijkerk, The Netherlands: Callenbach, 1979.Google Scholar

page 31 note3. Thomasma, DC, Graber, GC. Euthanasia: Toward an Ethical Policy. New York: Continuum, 1990.Google Scholar

page 31 note4. Menges, J. ‘Euthanasie’ in het Derde Rijk. Haarlem, The Netherlands: Erven Bohn, 1972.Google Scholar

page 31 note5. Capron, AM. Euthanasia in The Netherlands: American observations. Hastings Center Report 1992; 22 (2): 30–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

page 31 note6. Van den Berg, JH. Medische Macht en Medische Ethiek. Nijkerk, The Netherlands: Callenbach, 1969.Google Scholar

page 31 note7. Kerk, Ned. Herv.. Euthanasie. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boekencentrum, 1972.Google Scholar

page 31 note8. Van der Meer, C. Mochel, H. Tenzij een wonder gebeurt. Kok, Kampen, The Netherlands: 1971.Google Scholar

page 31 note9. Dekker, G. Gekerkerd geloof. Baarn, The Netherlands: Ambo, 1977.Google Scholar

page 31 note10. See note 2. Lindeboom, . 1979:20.Google Scholar

page 31 note11. See note 7. Nederlandse Hervormde Kerk. 1972.

page 31 note12. See van der, Sluis I. The practice of euthanasia in The Netherlands. Issues of Law and Medicine 1989; 4: 455–65.Google Scholar

page 31 note13. Gomez, CF. Regulating Death. New York: Free Press, 1991:138.Google Scholar

page 31 note14. Doerflinger, R. Assisted suicide: pro choice or anti-life? Hastings Center Report 1989; 1:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 31 note15. See note 13. Gomez, . 1991:xiv.Google Scholar

page 31 note16. Leenen, HJJ. Handboek Gezondheidsrecht. Alphen ad Rÿn, The Netherlands: Samson, 1988:287.Google Scholar

page 31 note17. See note 3. Thomasma, , Graber, . 1990.Google Scholar

page 31 note18. Staatscommissie Euthanasie. Rapport inzake euthanasia. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Staatsdrukkerj en Uitgeverj, 1985.Google Scholar

page 31 note19. See note 16. Leenen, . 1988:277.Google Scholar

page 31 note20. See note 16. Leenen, . 1988:287.Google Scholar

page 31 note21. See note 3. Thomasma, , Graber, . 1990.Google Scholar

page 31 note22. Van Berkestijn, T. Met het criterium ‘stervensfase’ is hek van de dam. Medisch Contact 1986; 10:291.Google Scholar

page 31 note23. ten Have, HAMJ, Welie, JVM. Euthanasia: normal medical practice? Hastings Center Report 1992;22(2):34–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

page 31 note 24. Van der Wal, G, Van Eijk, JTM, Leenen, HJJ, Spreeuwenberg, C. Euthanasie en hulp bij zelfdoding in de huisartsenpraktijk. Medisch Contact 1991;46:174–6.Google Scholar

page 31 note 25. Van der Wal, G, Christ, LM, Schuijt-Lucassen, NY et al. , Euthanasie en hulp bij zelfdoding door verpleeghuisartsen. 1. Een onderzoek. Medisch Contact 1991;46:1039–41.Google Scholar

page 31 note 26. Van der Wal, G, Van Eijk, JTM, Leenan, HJJ, Spreeuwenberg, C. Euthanasie en hulp bij zelfdoding door artsen in de thuissituatie. Nederlands Tijdschrift Geneeskunde 1991;135:1593–98, 1599–1603.Google Scholar

page 31 note 27. Gunning, KF. Euthanasia. Letter to the Editor. The Lancet 1991;338:1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 31 note 28. See note 23. ten, Have, Welie, . 1992;22(2):34–8.Google Scholar

page 31 note 29. Van der Maas, PJ, Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L, Looman, CWN. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. The Lancet 1991;338:669–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

page 31 note 30. See note 27. Gunning, . 1991;338:1010.Google Scholar

page 31 note 31. De Wachter, MAM. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. Hastings Center Report 1992;22(2):23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

page 31 note 32. See note 5. Capron, . 1992;22(2):30–3.Google Scholar

page 31 note 33. See note 23. ten, , Welie, . 1992;22(2):34–8.Google Scholar

page 31 note 34. See note 5. Capron, . 1992;22(2):30–3.Google Scholar

page 31 note 35. ten Have, HAMJ. Euthanasia in The Netherlands: the legal context and the cases. HEC Forum 1989;1:41–5.Google ScholarPubMed

page 33 note 1. Van der Maas, PJ, van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L, Looman, CWN. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. The Lancet 1991;338:669–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

page 33 note 2. Reed, J. Interdependence in euthanasia. Humane Medicine 1992; 8(2): 97–8.Google ScholarPubMed

page 33 note 3. Coward, H, Lipner, J, Young, K. Hindu Ethics: Purity, Abortion, and Euthanasia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1987.Google Scholar

page 33 note 4. See note 2. Reed, . 1992;8(2):98.Google Scholar

page 33 note 5. Loewy, E. Suffering as a consideration in ethical decision making. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1992;2:135–42, quote from 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 33 note 6. Scott, JF. Lamentation and euthanasia. Human Medicine 1992; 8(2): 116–21, quote from 116.Google ScholarPubMed