Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T18:16:24.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ewias Lacy Hundred1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Militia Assessments
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The charge against Llancillo is an error, but it is not clear when it was made. The month's tax quota would have been very close to one twelfth of £82 rather than of £8, just as for the first three months of the royal aid Llancillo was charged £5 16s 2d a month; Add. 11051, fo. 94.

References

2. HT 1664 (3).

3. HT 1664 (3).

4. HT 1664 (4).

5. HT 1664 (4) with Watkin Griffith.

6. Included Rowlston, normally taxed with it.

7. Chief constable of Ewias Lacy, 1663; Loan 29/49, pf. 4, no. 69/15.

8. The two blanks in this assessment were queried in error; they precede two lists of tenants.

9. HT 1664 (4).

10. HT 1664 (3).

11. The estates of Lord Hopton, who died in 1652, were inherited by his four sisters; Complete Peerage, ed. Cokayne, G. E. (new edn., London, 19101940), vi, p. 577n.Google Scholar

12. HT 1664 (8).

13. ‘&c’ is probably the copyist's abbreviation of the previous narrative descriptions repeated.

14. HT 1664(4).

15. ‘&c’ may refer to Lord Hopton's coheirs.

16. Included St Margaret's.

17. Thomas Prosser of St Margaret's, nephew of Esay Presser of Peterchurch, whose will was proved 1666 (PCC).

18. The largest HT charges in 1664 were on John Miles (3), Thomas Jennings of Newhouse (3) and William James with Katherine Waters (3).

19. Probably included Bwlch and Fwthwg (Foothog).

20. HT 1664 (8).

21. William Cecil, 2nd earl of Salisbury, 1591–1668; Complete Peerage, ed. Cokayne, , xi, p. 406.Google Scholar