Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T14:39:37.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(iv) The Quota Taxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

40 13 Car. II, c. 2.

41 16/17 Car. II, c. 1

42 1 Gul. & Mar. (2), c. 1. The hundred and parish quotas allocated in March 1664/5 were revised in May 1665 on the grounds that the city of Hereford had been overcharged by £39 in the first quarter; see Table 3; Add. 11051, fos. 87–121, passim. The Wigmore royal aid schedule summarised in the footnote on p. 133 lists the unrevised parish quotas; Loan 29/49, pf. 4, no. 69/14.

43 Chandaman, C. D., ‘The English Public Revenue, 1660–1688’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, London, 1954), p. 412.Google Scholar

44 Acts and Ordinances, 7 04 1649.Google Scholar

45 Chandaman, , op. cit., p. 416Google Scholar; CJ, viii, p. 582.Google Scholar

46 Add. 11051, fo. 11. The purveyance proportions were also explicitly followed by the justices in fixing the hundred quotas for the relief of the Ross plague victims in 1637; Add. 11054, fos. 33–4. The precedent provided by coat and conduct money hundred quotas, in 1627 for example, was not followed in allocating later quota taxes; Add. 11050, fo. 190.

47 See Tables 3 and 4.

48 The southern division of Wigmore hundred was formerly the lordship of Stepleton or Lugharnes.