Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T19:18:40.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radlow Hundred1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Militia Assessments
Information
Camden Fourth Series , Volume 10: Herefordshire Militia Assessments of 1663 , July 1972 , pp. 89 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Most of the parish charges bear the same or similar ratios to each other as do those of 1677. The inserted figures have largely been derived by using the 1677 proportions. Others do not permit this kind of interpolation. The Bishops Frome charge seems to have been deliberately understated; were it not so, the total charge for Egleton, Bishops Frome and Haymonds Frome would bear exactly the same relation to the total as does the charge for the whole parish in 1677. There is, however, no agreement in the charges on the various parts of Ledbury parish. The charge for ‘Ledbury Forren’ is puzzling because the Foreign is already wholly covered by the charges on Wallhills etc., Wellington, Muchell and Leadon and Haffield. As the other hundred charges under the 1661 and 1672 quotas and in this document show very similar proportions to the county charge, there must be a presumption that the Radlow charge should be about 12·7% of the county (without Hereford) charge. This requires the deduction of the ‘Ledbury Forren’ charge of £363, leaving the final hundred total of £1,732 13s 4d.

References

2. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on William George (4).

3. Chief constable of Radlow, 1663; Loan 29/49, pf. 4, no. 69/15.

4. Probably Tuston.

* Actual charge in brackets.

5. John Barston paid 14s to the FP 1661.

6. HT 1664 (5).

7. Vicar, FP 1661 (£4 paid); HT 1664 (5).

8. Chief constable of Radlow (Loan 29/49, pf. 4, no. 69/15); HT 1664 (5).

9. HT 1664 (5).

10. HT 1664 (5).

11. In 1646 the estate of Edward Slaughter of Cheyney's Court was valued at £134; Loan 29/15, pf. 2.

12. HT 1665 (9).

13. Probably Sir Thomas Hanbury, knighted circa 1665; Locke, A. Audrey, The Hanbury Family (London, 1916), i, p. 103.Google Scholar

14. JP 1660; sheriff 1664; FP 1661 (£10 unpaid); HT 1664 (12).

15. Curate of Castle Frome, FP 1661 (30s).

16. Dame Elizabeth Hopton, FP 1661 (£3 unpaid); HT 1664 (11). Sir Edward Hopton, who appears nowhere in these valuations, was JP q 1660 and DL 1660. He was elected MP for Hereford in 1661, but the election was declared void. He commanded a militia company in the mid-1660s; Loan 29/49, pf. 4, no. 69/15.

17. HT 1664 (4).

18. HT 1664 (4).

19. FP 1661 (£3 paid).

20. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on Henry Wright (9).

21. Leicester Devereux, 6th viscount Hereford, succeeded between 1649 and 1658; Complete Peerage, ed. Cokayne, , vi, p. 480.Google Scholar

22. Rector, FP 1661 (£10 paid).

23. Yeoman, will proved 4 July 1663 (PCC).

24. Gent., will proved 1668 (PCC).

25. HT 1664 (7); will proved 1670 (PCC).

26. Yeoman, will proved 1670 (PCC).

27. Yeoman, will proved 31 March 1664 (PCC).

28. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on John Perks (4).

29. William Lawrence paid 14s to the FP 1661.

30. JP 1660; sheriff 1663; FP 1661 (£10 paid); HT 1664 (12).

31. HT 1664 (3).

32. HT 1664 (9).

33. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on Bellingham Slaughter (10).

34. JP q 1655; FP 1661 (£5). clothier; will proved 1668 (PCC). He held land at Wormsley and Ledbury and left over £1,300 in bequests.

35. HT 1664 (9).

36. Glover, will proved 1664 (PCC).

37. HT 1664 (9).

38. HT 1664 (9).

39. Vicar, FP 1661 (£4).

40. Clothier, will proved 1668 (PCC).

41. Clothier, will proved 1667 (PCC).

42. Clothier, will proved 1670 (PCC).

43. Of the Hasell; FP 1661 (£10 paid); HT 1664 (10).

44. (1594–1676); father of Sir Thomas Hanbury; he lost heavily in the service of Charles I; Locke, A. Audrey, The Hanbury Family (London, 1916), i. p. 99 et seq.Google Scholar

45. Widow of Anthony Carwardine, yeoman, whose will was proved 16 May 1663 (PCC).

46. Yeoman, brother-in-law of Anthony Carwardine (see previous note); HT 1664 (4).

47. JP q 1660; FP 1661 (£10 unpaid); HT 1664 (9).

48. Will proved 1667 (PCC). He came from a Ledbury family and was related to many merchant families of that town. He owned property in Little Dewchurch, Ballingham, Ledbury, Leadon, Wallhills and Tupsley, and held leases in Hereford shire and Gloucestershire. He left legacies of about £950.

49. Will proved 1666 (PCC). His son Thomas Rodd was charged on 6 hearths in 1664.

50. Rector, FP 1661 (50s).

51. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on Thomas Seycell gent. (5).

52. JP q 1660; HT 1664 (9); will proved 1665 (FCC). He owned the manors of Pixley, Catley and Munsley and lands in Essex and Somerset.

53. Otherwise Parkhold.

54. Dame Alice Lingen was the widow of Sir Henry Lingen, who was buried at Stoke Edith on 22 Jan. 1661/2. He had been the most important royalist commander in the county during the Civil War. In 1646 his Herefordshire estates had been valued at £937 a year; Loan 29/15, pf. 2. HT 1664 (17). The Lingen estates later became the foundation of the Foley interests in the county; Robinson, , p. 257.Google Scholar

55. Robert Scudamore, rector, paid £10 to the FP 1661; instituted 22 Jan. 1662/3; Bannister, A. T., Diocese of Hereford Institutions, 1539–1900 (Hereford, 1923), p. 33.Google Scholar

56. Anthony Frere.

57. The free tenants had bought the manor; Harl. 6726. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on Walter Hopton Esq. (13).

58. HT 1664 (4).

59. Will proved 23 Feb. 1664 (Hereford).

60. Of Tyberton; his son Marshall Bridges was charged on 6 hearths in 1664.

61. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on Edward Withers (16).

62. JP q 1660; captain of a militia company in the mid-1660s; Loan 29/49, pf. 4, no. 69/15. His real estate in the county was valued at £110 a year in 1646; Loan 29/15, pf. 2.

63. Probably Sir Thomas Rich of Sunning, Berks; baronet 20 March 1660/1: Baronetage, iii, p. 180.Google Scholar

64. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on Edward Coucher (7).

65. Yeoman, will proved 1669 (PCC); he owned land in Wellington and Collwall and left legacies of £900.

66. The largest HT charges in Mitchel in 1664 were on Robert Dugmore and William Lewis (6 each).

67. Richard Sackville, 5th earl of Dorset; born 1622, succeeded 1652, died 1677 (DNB). The Herefordshire estates of the 4th earl were valued at £92 a year in 1646; Loan 29/15, pf. 2.

68. The largest HT charge in 1664 was on Edward Porter (5).

69. HT 1664(5).

70. Ursula Andrewes.

71. Francis Stedman senior, vicar of Yarkhill, paid 20s to the FP 1661.

72. HT 1664 (5).

73. Yeoman and blacksmith, will proved 20 September 1665 (Hereford); buried 14 Aug. 1665; his father, also Anthony Cole, died in 1659.