^{page 25 note 215} See pp. 76 and 165.

^{page 26 note 216} Edmund Archer, described as a cordwainer (see pp. 164–5); and John Pert and John Wroxham, described as souters (see pp. 172 and 189).

^{page 26 note 217} John Pert (see p. 75).

^{page 26 note 218} Edmund Archer (see pp. 76 and 164–5).

^{page 26 note 219} William Baxter (see pp. 39, 47–8, 50 and 179).

^{page 26 note 220} See pp. 41–51, 75 and 138–44.

^{page 26 note 221} See map (p. 27).

^{page 26 note 222} See pp. 182 and 185.

^{page 26 note 223} Tanner, N. P., ‘Popular Religion in Norwich with special Reference to the Evidence of Wills, 1370–1532’ (unpublished Oxford D.Phil, thesis, 1973), pp. 305–11.Google Scholar

^{page 26 note 224} Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 139–71.Google Scholar

^{page 26 note 225} Ibid., pp. 20–47.

^{page 26 note 226} Ibid., pp. 100–16.

^{page 26 note 227} See Table 2 (p. 11).

^{page 26 note 228} Lambeth Palace Library, Register of Archbishop Warham (1503–12), fos. 159r–v and 169v–171v.

* The numbers indicate how many defendants came from each place. In a few cases the place cannot be identified with certainty. These cases are noted in the footnotes to the text.

^{page 28 note 229} See p. 75.

^{page 28 note 230} See pp. 73–6.

^{page 28 note 231} See p. 75.

^{page 28 note 232} See pp. 140, 176 and 179.

^{page 28 note 233} See p. 47.

^{page 28 note 234} See pp. 43–51.

^{page 28 note 235} See p. 74.

^{page 28 note 236} See pp. 208–9 and 217.

^{page 28 note 237} See pp. 60 and 66.

^{page 28 note 238} See pp. 33, 146 and 218.

^{page 28 note 239} See pp. 146 and 152–3.

^{page 28 note 240} See p. 146.

^{page 28 note 241} I am indebted to Dr Hudson for this point and for most of the examples.

^{page 28 note 242} e.g., pp. 140 and 153.

^{page 28 note 243} See pp. 45–6.

^{page 28 note 244} See pp. 141–2.

^{page 28 note 245} See pp. 81 and 147.

^{page 28 note 246} See p. 146.

^{page 28 note 247} e.g., pp. 74 and 78.

^{page 28 note 248} See p, 147.

^{page 28 note 249} Hudson, , ‘A Lollard Compilation’, 80Google Scholar; ‘Some Aspects of Lollard Book Production’, Studies in Church History, ix (ed. Baker, D., Cambridge, 1972), 148 and 156–7.Google Scholar

^{page 29 note 250} See pp. 39, 41, 47–8, 60, 69, 75, 99 and 102.

^{page 29 note 251} See p. 100.

^{page 29 note 252} Foxe, , ActsGoogle Scholar, Book 6 (ed. Pratt, iii, p. 597). It is difficult to know whether Foxe distorted the evidence through wishful thinking, as he did in several other cases (see above, p. 8, n. 47, and p. 20).

^{page 29 note 253} See p. 7.

^{page 29 note 254} Thomson, , Later Lollards, p. 130.Google Scholar

^{page 29 note 255} See pp. 12, and 15–16.

^{page 29 note 256} See pp. 64, 72, 75–6, 104–5 and 165.

^{page 29 note 257} See p. 73.

^{page 29 note 258} See pp. 73, 89–90 and 217–18.

^{page 29 note 259} See pp. 26 and 28.

^{page 29 note 260} See under his name in the Index.

^{page 29 note 261} See p. 140, n. 164.

^{page 30 note 262} Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 173–6Google Scholar; Reg. Chichele, ed. Jacob, iii, pp. 85 and 199, and iv, pp. 297–301Google Scholar; see above, pp. 7–8, and under their names in the Index.

^{page 30 note 263} Thomson, , Later Lollards, p. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 264} See p. 185.

^{page 30 note 265} See p. 75.

^{page 30 note 266} See p. 20.

^{page 30 note 267} See p. 1, n. 14, and p. 75, n. 100.

^{page 30 note 268} McFarlane, , Wycliffe, p. 187.Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 269} For the only possible evidence in the manuscript to the contrary, see p. 90, n. 121, and p. 99, n. 132.