³⁸ McFarlane, , Wycliffe, p. 120.Google Scholar

³⁹ Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 28–30, 57–61, 120–31, 144–8, 174–7 and 223–4Google Scholar; see below, pp. 29–30.

⁴⁰ Reg. Chichele, ed. Jacob, i, p. cxxxvii.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid., iii, p. 185.

⁴² Hefele, C. J. and Leclerq, H., Histoire des Conciles (Paris, 1907–1916), vii, pp. 638–9.Google Scholar

⁴³ Fasciculi Zizaniorum, ed. Shirley, W. W. (Rolls Series, London, 1858), pp. 417–32.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See p. 45, n. 45.

⁴⁵ Annales Monasterii Sancii Albani a Johanne Amundesham conscripti, ed. Riley, H. T. (Rolls Series, London, 1870–1871), i, p. 29Google Scholar; The Records of the City of Norwich, ed. Hudson, W. and Tingey, J. (Norwich, 1906–1910), ii, p. 66.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ REG/5, Book 9, fos. 108r–103v. And see: Gage, J., ‘Letters …. for the Suppression of the Lollards’, Archaeologia, xxiii (1831), 339–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thomson, J. A. F., ‘A Lollard Rising in Kent: 1431 or 1438?’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, xxxvii (1964), 100–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁷ See Foxe, , ActsGoogle Scholar, Book 6 (ed. Pratt, iii, pp. 584–600). The principal record used by Foxe in his account of the persecution in the diocese is the manuscript here edited. The manuscript shows that there are many errors in his account. So it is difficult to know how reliable is his handling of this additional material. Some of the inaccuracies are discussed in Thomson, , ‘John Foxe’, 251–7.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Foxe, , ActsGoogle Scholar, Book 6 (ed. Pratt, iii, p. 587).

⁴⁹ See pp. 210–16.

⁵⁰ Earsham, south-east Norfolk.

⁵¹ See p. 75.

⁵² See pp. 75 and 89.

⁵³ Emden, , BRUO, ii, pp. 1343–4.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ See Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 28–30, 57–61, 120–31, 144–8, 174–7 and 223–4.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ See pp. 51–2.

⁵⁶ The Statutes of the Realm (London, 1810–1828), ii, pp. 181–4.Google Scholar