^{page 3 note 1} For an example of the value of diplomacy during war see note on p. 89 of the ‘ Relation.’

^{page 4 note 1} E. g. Vol. ii, p. 331, sub finem, and his constant references to Memoirs Communicated.

^{page 7 note 1} Harte, Vol. I, p. 443.

^{page 11 note 1} Maclean passim. Fosbrooke's Gloucestershire ii, pp. 99, sqq. From Hutchins, Dorset ii. pp. 703, 705, it appears that it was through the Gloucestershire branch that the Poyntzes became allied with the Sydenhams.

^{page 11 note 2} State Papers: Domestic 1624. vol. CLXXIX (otherwise case James I. C).

^{page 11 note 3} Werke, ed. 1834, p. 955.

^{page 12 note 1} Gustaf Adolf. I. p. 172.

^{page 13 note 1} E. g. Hist. MSS. Comm. Report V, App. p. 411. There is, however, a most unfavourable account of the conduct of the English troops at Breda in Uetterodt von Scharffenberg's Ernest Graf zu Mansfeld (Gotha, 1867) p. 621.

^{page 13 note 2} Uetterodt, p. 634.

^{page 13 note 3} Uetterodt, p. 677. Rittner in Küster's Antiquitt: Tangermundenses, Pt. II, p. 30.

^{page 14 note 1} Uetterodt, pp. 55, 97, 655, quoting in the latter place a broadside of 1625.

^{page 14 note 2} Cf. Niemann, Geschichte der Grafen im Mansfeld (Aschersleben, 1834), p. 226. Niemann also cites authorities for the attack on (?) Rogäz.

^{page 15 note 1} Fortescue, Hist, of the British Army I, p. 169.

^{page 15 note 2} de Villermont, Hennequin, Mansfeld. (Brux. 1865), II, p. 343Google Scholar, calls it Ratona. Uetterodt (p. 706) gives a choice of Urakowitz, Wrakowitz, Rackau, and Rokau.

^{page 18 note 1} State Papers : Domestic : 1623, vol. CLIV, no. 8.

^{page 19 note 1} State Papers : Domestic : 1628, vol. XCI, no. 38.

^{page 20 note 1} Geschichten des grossen deutschen Krieges i. p. 221.

^{page 23 note 1} Soldan. Geschichte der Hexenprozesse. Stuttgart 1880. There was a fortnightly ‘ auto da fé’ at Würzburg, even children of nine years old being burned alive. It was only stopped when some of the victims, under the torture, denounced the Bishop himself as a sorcerer, cf. Church Quarterly Review. Jan. 1904.

^{page 27 note 1} E. g. Winter. Dreissigjähr: Krieg, p. 421, presumably relying on some unquoted authority.

^{page 27 note 2} Harte. II, p. 268 note.

^{page 28 note 1} Lotichius, , Rerum Germanicarum libri, vol. ii, p. 252Google Scholar. Khevenhüller. xii. 1276.

^{page 28 note 2} E. g. Leslie : Historical Records of the Family of Leslie, (Edinb. 1869) vol. iii, p. 242. Fischer : Scots in Germany, p. 283.

^{page 29 note 1} Neuere Geschichte der Deutschen, vii, p. 388. Theatrum Europœum iii, p. 114; cf. Mitchell, Life of Wallenstein, p. 336, who has a fourth (slightly divergent) version and Förster Wallenstein p. 216 n. even a fifth.

^{page 29 note 2} Annales xii, 589.

^{page 30 note 1} Liliencron in the Deutsche Rundschau Lxxxiii. p. 214.

^{page 30 note 2} Hallwich (s. n.) in the Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie.

^{page 31 note 1} Liliencron, ubi supra, p. 215.

^{page 31 note 2} Arch. Seld, A subt. 6. ‘Schaffenberg’ cannot possibly to Schäftenberg, who was with Wallenstein at Pilsen.

^{page 33 note 1} Förster. Wallenstein. p. 379n.

^{page 37 note 1} Harte's estimate of the pay of an officer is (vol. i, p. 16) based on the money values of his own time. Freytag's (Bilder aus der Deutschen Vergangenheit, iii) calculations are on the sounder basis of the comparative price of corn, and are here taken as authoritative.

^{page 37 note 2} Winter, Dreissigjähr: Krieg, pp. 290, 359 gives facsimiles of two ‘ ordinances’, one of Gustavus Adolphus (1632), and one of Ferdinand III (1639), regulating pay and perquisites.

^{page 38 note 1} Maclean, Poyntz Family, p. 175, who writes ‘ Count Stephanus de Casy.’

^{page 38 note 2} History of Surrey iv, p. 212–213.

^{page 40 note 1} Grainger, quoted by Maclean, p. 184.

^{page 40 note 2} Vol. 18, p. 437. He also according to Ranke (Wallenstein, p. 308 n.) told his story to the Tuscan ambassador.

^{page 43 note 1} It is also written Storschedel.