^{page vii note 1} No. I.

^{page vii note 2} Pedigree ap. Nash, Worcestershire, i, 2; the pedigree is not quite accurate, but John de Harnhull lived in the reign of Edward I, and his daughter no doubt married Richard de Stonor.

^{page vii note 3} Ancient Deeds, C. 294: see vol. ii, p. 171.

^{page vii note 4} Id., C. 1185 : see vol. ii, p. 171.

^{page viii note 1} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. II, ii, 244.

^{page viii note 2} Id., ii, 580, 598, 678, 686, etc.

^{page viii note 3} Trans. Royal Hist. Soc., 3rd series, iii, 166–67.

^{page viii note 4} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. II, iii, 508.

^{page viii note 5} Id., iv, 249, 385.

^{page viii note 6} Id., v, I; Foedera, ii, 559.

^{page viii note 7} Id., ii, 587; Cal. Pat. Rolls, v, 84, 103; Cal. Close Rolls, iv, 344, 350.

^{page viii note 8} No. 2.

^{page viii note 9} Cal. Close Rolls, iv, 417.

^{page ix note 1} Cal. Close Rolls, iv, 456, 652; Cal. Pat. Rolls, v, 331.

^{page ix note 2} Id., Edw. III, i, 2.

^{page ix note 3} Memorials of St. Edmund's Abbey, ii, 348, 353 ; iii, 302.

^{page ix note 4} Cal. Pat. Rolls, i, 365, 439.

^{page ix note 5} Id., i, 556.

^{page ix note 6} Id., ii, 78.

^{page ix note 7} Id., ii, 102.

^{page ix note 8} Id., ii, 146.

^{page ix note 9} Id., iii, 39, 136, 351.

^{page ix note 10} Litterae Cantuarienses, ii, 84. 87, 9S.

^{page ix note 11} Murimuth, Chron., p. 117.

^{page ix note 12} Cal. Pat. Rolls, v, 427.

^{page x note 1} Cal. Close Rolls, x, 4.

^{page x note 2} The date of his death is given variously in the Inquisitions as 12, 24 or 31 August.

^{page x note 3} Leland, Itinerary, i, 117: “there lyeth one Stoner, sumtyme a juge, as it apperithe by his habits”.

^{page x note 4} See Nos. 3 and 4.

^{page x note 5} No. 2.

^{page x note 6} Litterae Cantuarienses, ii, 108.

^{page x note 7} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. II, iii, 553.

^{page x note 8} See vol. ii, p. 172.

^{page x note 9} Cal. Close Rolls, Edw. II, iv, 632.

^{page x note 10} See vol. ii, p. 166.

^{page x note 11} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. III, iv, 557.

^{page x note 12} Cal. Close Rolls, Edw. III, vi, 150.

^{page xi note 1} See vol. ii, p. 166 below. See also Brantingham, Issue Rolls, p. 188.

^{page xi note 2} Ancient Deeds, C. 3598, see vol. ii, p. 171 below ; Nash, Worcestershire, i, 2. In the next century, Philip Fitz Lewis called Sir William Stonor his cousin. See No. 326. The Visitation of Oxfordshire (Harleian Society), p. 143, describes Sir John's wife as a daughter ol the Lord Lisle; but this pedigree is very untrustworthy, and there seems to be a confusion with the wife of Edmund de Stonor.

^{page xi note 3} Cal. Close Rolls, x, 127.

^{page xi note 4} Year Book, 16 Edward III, i, 7–10; ii, 58.

^{page xi note 5} Cal. Close Rolls, viii, 264.

^{page xi note 6} Cal. Pat. Rolls, x, 67.

^{page xi note 7} Id., Edw. III, xii, 102.

^{page xi note 8} Id., i, 567.

^{page xi note 9} Id., xv, 171.

^{page xi note 10} See No. 137 giving the Oxfordshire lands of the second Thomas Stonor.

^{page xi note 11} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. III, File 164.

^{page xii note 1} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, File 85.

^{page xii note 2} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. II, ii, 569,663.

^{page xii note 3} Cal. Close Rolls, Edw. III, iii, 499.

^{page xii note 4} Cal. Pat. Rolls. Edw. III, viii, 290.

^{page xii note 5} Nos. 140 and 157.

^{page xii note 6} Ch. Inq.p.m., Edw. III, File 164.

^{page xii note 7} See No. 19.

^{page xii note 8} See No. 41.

^{page xii note 9} See No. 140.

^{page xii note 10} See Nos. 172, 233.

^{page xii note 11} No. 285.

^{page xii note 12} See No. 260.

^{page xii note 13} See No. 255.

^{page xiii note 1} Leland, Itinerary, v, 72.

^{page xiii note 2} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. II, iii, 47; Ancient Deeds, C. 3598.

^{page xiii note 3} Id., C. 1710, see vol. ii, p. 171 below.

^{page xiii note 4} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. III, File 164.

^{page xiii note 5} Id., Richard II, File 85.

^{page xiii note 6} Apparently in 1417, see No. 41.

^{page xiii note 7} See Nos. 54, 137, and 228. No. 137 gives the lands of the second Thomas Stonor in Berkshire.

^{page xiii note 8} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. III, File 128.

^{page xiii note 9} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. II, ii, 434; Ancient Deeds, C. 231, see also vol. ii, p. 172 below.

^{page xiii note 10} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, File 85.

^{page xiii note 11} See No. 54.

^{page xiii note 12} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. IV, File 82.

^{page xiv note 1} Ancient Deeds, C. 4688, see vol. ii, p. 171 below. See also No. 45, and Feudal Aids, i, 399.

^{page xiv note 2} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. III, ii, 146.

^{page xiv note 3} Year Book 20, Edw. III, i, 236–56.

^{page xiv note 4} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. III, ix, 205–6.

^{page xiv note 5} See Nos. 42, 45, 46, 63, 64, 71, 72, 79–82, 126, 127, and 184.

^{page xiv note 6} Feudal Aids, i, 399 ; see also Nos. 38, 79, and 81.

^{page xiv note 7} See No. 54.

^{page xiv note 8} See Nos. 137, 279, 284, 286, 291.

^{page xiv note 9} See Nos. 272, 313, and p. xxxii below.

^{page xiv note 10} Ch. Inq. p.m., 28 Edw. III, File 128; cf. Cal. Close Rolls, Edw. III, x, 127, and Feudal Aids, ii, 291.

^{page xv note 1} Ch. Inq. p.m., 5 Richard II, File 21.

^{page xv note 2} V.C.H., Hampshire, iv, 382.

^{page xv note 3} Feudal Aids, ii, 329; Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. III, File 164.

^{page xv note 4} Cal. Close Rolls, Edw. III, xiii, 195–99.

^{page xv note 5} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, Files 21, 61, 85.

^{page xv note 6} See Nos. 304, 305, 323, 325.

^{page xv note 7} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. III, File 128.

^{page xv note 8} See No. 54.

^{page xv note 9} Feudal Aids, iii, 203.

^{page xv note 10} See vol. ii, p. 177 below.

^{page xv note 11} Cat. Close Rolls, Edw. III, iii, 163.

^{page xv note 12} Ancient Deeds, C. 1223, see vol. ii, p. 173 below.

^{page xv note 13} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. III, File 128.

^{page xv note 14} See No. 33.

^{page xvi note 1} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, File 85.

^{page xvi note 2} See No. 54.

^{page xvi note 3} Cal. Close Rolls, Edw. III, iii, 339.

^{page xvi note 4} Cat. Inq., iv, 29.9.

^{page xvi note 5} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, Files 21, 61, and 85.

^{page xvi note 6} No. 54.

^{page xvi note 7} No. 202.

^{page xvi note 8} Cal. Close Rolls, Edw. II, ii, 235.

^{page xvi note 9} Id., Edw. III, v, 327.

^{page xvi note 10} Id., ix, 20.

^{page xvi note 11} Id., ix, 58a, 584.

^{page xvii note 1} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. III, ix, 205.

^{page xvii note 2} Id., x, 221.

^{page xvii note 3} Nash, Worcestershire, i, 2. Is there a possible error of Wenard Oxon. for Wenard Exon. ? In Burke's Commoners, ii, 440, he is described as Wenard of Cornwall. For the later connexion of the Devonshire Wennards with the Stonors, see p. xxxix.

^{page xvii note 4} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. III, xv, 93.

^{page xvii note 5} Id., xii, 57; see Nos. 6 and 7 below.

^{page xvii note 6} Cal. Pat. Rolls, xii, 82.

^{page xvii note 7} Cal. Close Rolls, Richard II, i, 356.

^{page xvii note 8} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Richard II, i, 466.

^{page xvii note 9} Id., i, 513.

^{page xvii note 10} Id., ii, 84.

^{page xvii note 11} Id., 87.

^{page xvii note 12} See Nos. 9 to 23 below.

^{page xviii note 1} No. 30.

^{page xviii note 2} No. 31.

^{page xviii note 3} No. 19.

^{page xviii note 4} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, File 21.

^{page xviii note 5} See No. 17. She is possibly the Dame Margaret of No. 29.

^{page xviii note 6} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Richard II, ii, 117.

^{page xviii note 7} Id., ii, 202, 204.

^{page xviii note 8} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, File 61. The Inquisitions were held at various dates between January and June; that for Southampton was held on 27 June and gives Ralph's age as 21 and a half and more.

^{page xviii note 9} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Richard II, iv, 174.

^{page xviii note 10} Id., v, 476, 482.

^{page xix note 1} Ch. Inq. p.m., Richard II, File 85.

^{page xix note 2} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Richard II, v, 621.

^{page xix note 3} P.C.C., 21 Marche. Proved 20 April, 1420. The expenses of his funeral, other than alms to the poor, were not to exceed 20s. Two of his executors were Thomas Joye, rector of Penyngton (Penton Mewsey) and John Starlyng, rector of Hampden.

^{page xix note 4} See note to No. 47 below.

^{page xix note 5} See Nos. 54 and 56 and ii, 173, 175.

^{page xix note 6} Nos. 75 and 187.

^{page xix note 7} Ch. Inq. p.m., Henry VI, File 132. See also vol. i, 50 and vol. ii, 181.

^{page xix note 8} See Nos. 144, 157,177, 170, and ii, 187. He married Anne, daughter of William Norris; see pedigree, ap. Harley MS., 1533, f. 57, and p. 118 below.

^{page xix note 9} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Richard II, v, 564.

^{page xix note 10} Id., Henry IV, ii, 335, 455.

^{page xix note 11} Ap. Harley MS., 1391, f. ig.

^{page xx note 1} See p. 30 below.

^{page xx note 2} For her descent, see Wrottesley, Pedigrees from the Plea Rolls, p. 323. She and Thomas Stonor sued John Isaak for lands in Hopelond, Chistlet and Stury as heirs of Ralph de St. Lawrence, temp. Edw. I.

^{page xx note 3} Ancient Deeds, C. 5558.

^{page xx note 4} No. 42.

^{page xx note 5} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Henry VI, i, 303, 568; ii, 51.

^{page xx note 6} Nos. 41–54.

^{page xx note 7} No. 46.

^{page xx note 8} No. 47.

^{page xx note 9} Nos. 42, 45 and 46.

^{page xxi note 1} See No. 46.

^{page xxi note 2} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Henry V, ii, 447.

^{page xxi note 3} Early Chancery Proceedings, 75/77 (P.R.O.).

^{page xxi note 4} See Nos. 63, 64, 71, 72, 79–82, and 91.

^{page xxi note 5} See p. xxxv below.

^{page xxi note 6} Ch. Inq. p.m., Henry VI, File 48.

^{page xxi note 7} No. 54.

^{page xxi note 8} Nos. 87, 115.

^{page xxi note 9} Nos. 60 and 87–88.

^{page xxi note 10} Burke, Commoners, ii, 440; cf. Nos. 135, 260.

^{page xxi note 11} Nos. 98 and 99.

^{page xxi note 12} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edw. IV, iii, 487.

^{page xxi note 13} No. 56.

^{page xxi note 14} Id.

^{page xxi note 15} Nos. 55 and 56, see also vol. ii, p. 181.

^{page xxi note 16} No. 91.

^{page xxii note 1} Nos. 69, 90, 100.

^{page xxii note 2} Cf. No. III, where he calls Drayton his father.

^{page xxii note 3} No. 89.

^{page xxii note 4} No. 182.

^{page xxii note 5} The keeper of the Accounts in No. 96 seems also to be a son or son-in-law of Alice Drayton ; he refers to “my brother Mull”. The reference in the Account to the “dethe of my modyr” may be a note by Thomas Stonor.

^{page xxii note 6} See No. 54. The Devonshire Inquisition at Alice Drayton's death (Ch. Inq. p.m., Edward IV, File 29) recites that her first husband being sused of the manor of Ermington and hundred of Ermington, forty acres in Bukford Walles, the water of Erme and its fishery, the “hundredespeny,” view of frank pledge of Great Modbury, “et de tremura de Kilbury,” with the advowson of Ermington and of the free chapel in the cemetery, enfeoffed Thomas Chaucer and others, who on 2nd May, 1432 demised all except the fishery to Alice for life. The feoffers in 1468 were John Hampden, John Wroughton, John Butteller, William Bekyngham, John Lydyard, Richard Bedford, and Henry Dogett.

^{page xxii note 7} No. 91.

^{page xxii note 8} See No. 77 and Ancient Deeds, C. 6944, vol. ii, p. 174 below.

^{page xxii note 9} Cf. Nos. 64 and 92

^{page xxii note 10} P.C.C., 26 Godyn.

^{page xxii note 11} Ch. Inq. p.m., Henry VI, File 48.

^{page xxii note 12} No. 54.

^{page xxiii note 1} See vol. ii, p. 181. Dogett appears frequently in the Letters. He died in 1491, and by his will directed that he should be buried in the church of Pusey in the chapel of St. Nicholas. P.C.C., 1 Dogett. Cf. No. 256.

^{page xxiii note 2} Visitation of Oxfordshire, p. 143, Harleian Society. In the pedigree ap. Nash, Worcestershire, i, 2, Thomas Stonor's wife is called a daughter of John de la Pole; this is of course absurd, as John de la Pole was not born till 1445. William de la Pole was serving in France from 1417 to 1430, and may well have had a daughter of suitable age “born in Normandy”.

^{page xxiii note 3} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Henry VI, vi, 70.

^{page xxiii note 4} No. 59.

^{page xxiii note 5} Nos. 70 and 112.

^{page xxiii note 6} See Nos. 82 and 97.

^{page xxiii note 7} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Edward IV, ii, 248–9; he only appears on one commission of earlier date.

^{page xxiii note 8} Id., ii, 285, 350.

^{page xxiii note 9} Id., i, 570; ii, 625; he held a session with William Marmion at Henley in January, 1465—see K. B., Ancient Indictments, 315/18 (P.R.O.).

^{page xxiv note 1} Nos. 71, 86, 92, 96, 98, 106.

^{page xxiv note 2} No. 106.

^{page xxiv note 3} No 91.

^{page xxiv note 4} No. 124.

^{page xxiv note 5} Nos. 65, 67, and 76.

^{page xxiv note 6} Nos. 63, 64, 71, 72, 79–82, and 91.

^{page xxiv note 7} Nos. 126, 127.

^{page xxiv note 8} Nos. 100, III.

^{page xxiv note 9} Nos. 121–24.

^{page xxiv note 10} Nos. 69, 100.

^{page xxiv note 11} No. 75.

^{page xxiv note 12} Nos. 87, 115, 197.

^{page xxiv note 13} Nos. 89, 179, and 182.

^{page xxiv note 14} Nos. 94, 116.

^{page xxiv note 15} No. 110.

^{page xxiv note 16} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. IV, File 82.

^{page xxiv note 17} No. 138.

^{page xxiv note 18} No. 157.

^{page xxiv note 19} No. 137.

^{page xxiv note 20} Nos. 109, 110, 128, 136.

^{page xxiv note 21} No. 294.

^{page xxiv note 22} No. 114.

^{page xxiv note 23} No. 153.

^{page xxv note 1} Early Chancery Proceedings, 64/910 (P.R.O.).

^{page xxv note 2} See p. xxxvi below.

^{page xxv note 3} See p. xxvi below.

^{page xxv note 4} Nos. 142, 151, and 153.

^{page xxv note 5} See p. xxxv below.

^{page xxv note 6} Nos. 152, 155, and 156.

^{page xxv note 7} See Nos. 228 and 232 ; perhaps he died of smallpox in 1476, see No. 169.

^{page xxv note 8} Nos. 175 and 180.

^{page xxv note 9} Nos. 70, 106, 120, and 158.

^{page xxv note 10} Nos. 157 and 158.

^{page xxv note 11} Nos. 301 and 320.

^{page xxv note 12} P.C.C., Vox 16. Proved 16th November, 1494.

^{page xxv note 13} Sotwell St. John, and Sotwell Stonor.

^{page xxvi note 1} See Note to No. 139. A Berkshire Inquisition held in October, 1482 (Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. IV, File 82) gives William Stonor's age as 33.

^{page xxvi note 2} No. 86.

^{page xxvi note 3} No. 115.

^{page xxvi note 4} Nos. 97, 118, 127, 128.

^{page xxvi note 5} No. 124.

^{page xxvi note 6} No. 127.

^{page xxvi note 7} No. 136.

^{page xxvi note 8} Nos. 121–4.

^{page xxvi note 9} No. 142.

^{page xxvii note 1} See Nos. 168, 183.

^{page xxvii note 2} Collections of a London Citizen, p. xlvi, where Gregory in his will dated 6th November, 1465, mentions his god-daughter Kateryn, daughter of Thomas Ryche.

^{page xxvii note 3} P.C.C., 4 Godyn.

^{page xxvii note 4} See No. 168, which suggests that Ryche died in August, 1474.

^{page xxvii note 5} P.C.C., 20 Wattys. It was not proved till 4th October, 1475. But Ryche certainly died before 1st July, 1475 (Letter Book, L., p. 131), and Elizabeth had probably remarried before that date.

^{page xxvii note 6} See Nos. 248–50.

^{page xxvii note 7} See Nos. 222, 224–5.

^{page xxviii note 1} Nos. 175, 180.

^{page xxviii note 2} No. 172.

^{page xxviii note 3} For her Letters, see Nos. 168–70, 172–3, 175–6, 180, 204, 208, 226, 229, 237.

^{page xxviii note 4} For his Letters see Nos. 161–2, 166, 185, 205, 207, 211, 212, 216–18, 224.

^{page xxviii note 5} No. 166.

^{page xxviii note 6} Fenn's Will, P.C.C., 17 Wattys.

^{page xxviii note 7} Nos. 172, 217–18.

^{page xxviii note 8} Nos. 249–51.

^{page xxviii note 9} Nos. 264, 282.

^{page xxviii note 10} P.C.C., 24 Logge. There is a codicil dated 30th September, 1485. The will; was proved on 12th May, 1486.

^{page xxix note 1} Nos. 163, 222, 251.

^{page xxix note 2} P.C.C., 25 Bennett.

^{page xxix note 3} P.C.C., 17 Wattys. Elizabeth Stonor bought wax for his mind in September 1477, see No. 227. Henry Fenn and Lawrence Fyncham were his executors.

^{page xxix note 4} As well as country gentlemen : see Nos. 94 and 116.

^{page xxix note 5} Calendar of Letter Book, L., p. 136.

^{page xxix note 6} See Nos. 185, 208.

^{page xxix note 7} No. 180.

^{page xxix note 1} Calendar of Letter Book, L., p. 162.

^{page xxix note 2} No. 249.

^{page xxix note 3} No. 183.

^{page xxix note 4} Nos. 282, 287, 288.

^{page xxix note 5} No. 287. See Calendar of Letter Book, L., p. 177.

^{page xxix note 6} Id., p. 131.

^{page xxix note 7} No. 248.

^{page xxix note 8} Nos. 179, 182.

^{page xxix note 9} Shaw, Knigkts of England, i, 137–8.

^{page xxix note 10} He seems to have been made a knight ot the body between July, 1478, and September, 1479 ; compare Nos. 220 and 247.

^{page xxix note 11} No. 255; see also No. 278.

^{page xxxi note 1} For other stewardships see Nos, 237, 239, 244.

^{page xxxi note 2} Cf. No. 312.

^{page xxxi note 3} No. 238.

^{page xxxi note 4} No. 260.

^{page xxxi note 5} No. 150. See also No. 179 where in 1477 Thomas Ramsey advises Stonor to keep “grete sadde rewle”.

^{page xxxi note 6} No. 211; see the references to debts in Nos. 222, 224, and 229.

^{page xxxi note 7} Nos. 261–2.

^{page xxxi note 8} Oliver, Monasticon Exoniense, pp. 404–6.

^{page xxxi note 9} P.C.C., 14 Rous.

^{page xxxi note 10} Id., 25 Godyn.

^{page xxxi note 11} The Devonshire Inquisition on Agnes Stonor's death deals with lands at Wonefordhill, South Woneford, East Woneford, Hode, Lowvale, Wyllemorlegh, Chollewylle, South Wympell, Brode Clyst, Cavykestrete, Wodelegh, Ayshe Hodewyle, Bukyngton, Manston, Sydbury, Kyngswere, Hatherleigh, Pynne, Sterton, Dawlish Kenton, and Exeter. Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. IV, File 42.

^{page xxxii note 1} See Nos. 267–8.

^{page xxxii note 2} See Nos. 268.

^{page xxxii note 3} See Nos. 266–8.

^{page xxxii note 4} Ch. Inq. p.m., Edw. IV, File 80; they were forfeited in 1483 (see p. xxxiv), but recovered and held by Stonor at his death, Cal. Inq., Henry VII, i, 977.

^{page xxxii note 5} Nos. 268, 272, 284, 285, 289.

^{page xxxii note 6} Cf. No. 285.

^{page xxxii note 7} Cf. Nos. 230, 287, 288.

^{page xxxii note 8} No. 285.

^{page xxxii note 9} Nos. 301.

^{page xxxii note 10} No. 320. Sir William Stonor had a dispute of his own with the Queen : see Nos. 313, 319.

^{page xxxiii note 1} See Nos. 305–6.

^{page xxxiii note 2} Nos. 306, 314.

^{page xxxiii note 3} Cf. Nos. 321, 322.

^{page xxxiii note 4} No. 328.

^{page xxxiii note 5} Nos. 330, 331.

^{page xxxiii note 6} Excerpta Historica, p. 384.

^{page xxxiii note 7} No. 333.

^{page xxxiii note 8} In his will—P.C.C., Vox. 12—dated 22nd August, 1483, and proved 20th October, 1493, he makes bequests to the high altars of the church within the Temple and at Horton. He refers to Beterys his late wife, and left his son Edmond his lands in Kent, with remainder to his grandson Richard, son of his son Henry.

^{page xxxiv note 1} No. 326.

^{page xxxiv note 2} Nos. 263, 282, 287–8.

^{page xxxiv note 3} Nos. 282, 287, 288.

^{page xxxiv note 4} Nos. 247, 276, 309, 310, 321.

^{page xxxiv note 5} Nos. 322, 324, 326–7.

^{page xxxiv note 6} Nos. 220, 221.

^{page xxxiv note 7} Nos. 291, 311.

^{page xxxiv note 8} Nos. 313, 317.

^{page xxxiv note 9} Nos. 299–301.

^{page xxxiv note 10} Nos. 190–2, 275, 304.

^{page xxxiv note 11} No. 303.

^{page xxxiv note 12} Cf. Harley MS. 433, f. 121, for estates in Bucks, and Beds, on 2nd Nov., 1483.

^{page xxxiv note 13} Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1476–85, pp. 378, 433, 481.

^{page xxxiv note 14} See p. xxxii above.

^{page xxxiv note 15} Harley MS. 433, f. 286. For Anne Kedwell and Barowyscotte or Buscot see No. 228.

^{page xxxv note 1} Harley MS. 433, f. 59, and Cal. Pat. Rolls, p. 454.

^{page xxxv note 2} Cal. Pat. Rolls, Henry VII, i, 205.

^{page xxxv note 3} Id. ib.

^{page xxxv note 4} Paston Letters, vi, 187.

^{page xxxv note 5} Cal. Inq., Henry VII, i, 161.

^{page xxxv note 6} Cf. Nos. 321–2; he was returned as 4 years old at his mother's death.

^{page xxxv note 7} Cal. Inq., Henry VII, i, 977; for his will see P.C.C., 20 Vox.

^{page xxxv note 8} Cal Pat. Rolls, Henry VII, iii, 21.

^{page xxxv note 9} In 1499, cf. Cal. Inq., ii, 118.

^{page xxxvi note 1} Statutes of the Realm, iii, 690–93, ed. 1807, 28 Henry VIII, cap. 36.

^{page xxxvi note 2} The John Stonor who died on 29th August, 1512, and was buried at Wyrardisbury, seems to have been a son of Walter Stonor. Coll. Top et Gen., viii, 400.

^{page xxxvi note 3} See vol. ii, p. 184.

^{page xxxvii note 1} There are no papers at all between 1483 and 1492.

^{page xxxvii note 2} No. 59.

^{page xxxvii note 3} Nos. 148, 151, 204, 229, 330, 331.

^{page xxxvii note 4} See No. 54.

^{page xxxvii note 5} E.g. Nos. 134 and 298 only came to light in 1916. No. 59 was reprinted in the Paston Letters from Archæologia, the original not then being forthcoming.

^{page xxxvii note 6} Chancery Miscellanea, 37. See the list in vol. ii, pp. 165–70. They include all the documents relating to the office of sheriff, household accounts, inventories, and other miscellaneous papers such as the Funeral Accounts in Nos. 47 and 138.

^{page xxxvii note 7} The omitted Letters are all too fragmentary to be worth printing; some of those which are printed are slight in themselves, but any omissions would have been open to exception; English letters of this early date are seldom devoid of interest of some kind, and even the slightest have generally some value for the illustration of other Letters or Documents.

^{page xxxviii note 1} Nos. 80, 82 (the greater part), and 182.

^{page xxxviii note 2} A. C. = Ancient Correspondence; Ch. Misc. = Chancery Miscellanea.

^{page xxxviii note 3} See vol. ii, pp. 165–84.

^{page xxxviii note 4} Vol. ii, pp. 185–8.

^{page xxxviii note 5} There are 256 letters (not counting fragments), and upwards of 600 documents all told ; see vol. ii, pp. 165–88. .

^{page xxxix note 1} Nos. 70 and 112.

^{page xxxix note 2} Nos. 152 and 153.

^{page xxxix note 3} No. 59.

^{page xxxix note 4} No. 73.

^{page xxxix note 5} No. 112.

^{page xxxix note 6} Nos. 113, 170, 172, 220, 239, 287, 288, 313.

^{page xxxix note 7} No. 204.

^{page xxxix note 8} No. 223.

^{page xxxix note 9} No. 318.

^{page xxxix note 10} Nos. 331–2; they were printed in Excerpta Historica, pp. 16, 17.

^{page xxxix note 11} No. 333.

^{page xl note 1} See vol. ii, pp. 177–82.

^{page xl note 2} Nos. 10–12, 14, 16, 17, 22, 23.

^{page xl note 3} Nos. 9, 13, 15, 18, 20, 21.

^{page xl note 4} No. 19.

^{page xl note 5} No. 84.

^{page xl note 6} No. 52.

^{page xl note 7} No. 85, cf. also No. 78, and Ch. Misc., v, 21; ix, 12, and Ancient Deeds, C. 5650, 1968; see vol. ii, p. 174.

^{page xl note 8} No. 83.

^{page xl note 9} Nos. 94, 200, 220, 243.

^{page xl note 10} Nos. 136, 199, 237, 239, 240, 344, 255.

^{page xl note 11} No. 41.

^{page xl note 12} No. 42.

^{page xl note 13} Nos. 171, 231, 245, 256, 265.

^{page xl note 14} Cf. Nos. 189, 244.

^{page xli note 1} Nos. 263, 282, 287, 288.

^{page xli note 2} Nos. 63, 64, 71, 81, 126, 174, 184, 270.

^{page xli note 3} No. 193.

^{page xli note 4} Nos. 299, 301.

^{page xli note 5} No. 298.

^{page xli note 6} Nos. 268, 272.

^{page xli note 7} No. 313.

^{page xli note 8} Nos. 291, 311.

^{page xli note 9} Nos. 45, 46.

^{page xli note 10} Nos. 63, 64.

^{page xlii note 1} No. 69, cf. No. 79.

^{page xlii note 2} No. 80.

^{page xlii note 3} No. 91.

^{page xlii note 4} See Appendix to Introduction, pp. xlviii-lvi below.

^{page xlii note 5} Nos. 310, 311.

^{page xlii note 6} No. 313.

^{page xlii note 7} No. 320.

^{page xlii note 8} Nos. 266–68, 313.

^{page xlii note 9} No. 50.

^{page xlii note 10} No. 140.

^{page xlii note 11} Nos. 19, 55, 101, 146, 233.

^{page xlii note 12} No. 39.

^{page xlii note 13} No. 227.

^{page xlii note 14} No. 234.

^{page xlii note 15} Nos. 235, 317.

^{page xliii note 1} No. 222.

^{page xliii note 2} No. 252.

^{page xliii note 3} See Nos. 146 and 233.

^{page xliii note 4} No. 95.

^{page xliii note 5} Nos. 164, 209, 210, 235, 313.

^{page xliii note 6} No. 106.

^{page xliii note 7} No. 234.

^{page xliii note 8} No. 262.

^{page xliii note 9} No. 176.

^{page xliii note 10} No. 183.

^{page xliii note 11} No. 155.

^{page xliii note 12} No. 110.

^{page xliii note 13} No. 138.

^{page xliv note 1} See Nos. 75, 76, 87, 110, 119, 236, 242.

^{page xliv note 2} No. 130.

^{page xliv note 3} Nos. 86 and 198.

^{page xliv note 4} Nos. 269, 274.

^{page xliv note 5} No. 172.

^{page xliv note 6} Nos. 163, 164, 222, 223.

^{page xliv note 7} No. 223, compare No. 159.

^{page xlv note 1} Nos. 61, 157, and 196.

^{page xlv note 2} No. 18.

^{page xlv note 3} No. 31.

^{page xlv note 4} No. 84.

^{page xlv note 5} No. 85.

^{page xlv note 6} No. 74.

^{page xlv note 7} No. 181.

^{page xlv note 8} No. 280.

^{page xlv note 9} No. 195.

^{page xlv note 10} No. 303.

^{page xlv note 11} No. 271.

^{page xlvi note 1} No. 274.

^{page xlvi note 2} Nos. 188, 250, 275.

^{page xlvi note 3} No. 166.

^{page xlvi note 4} No. 176.

^{page xlvi note 5} No. 260.

^{page xlvi note 6} No. 298.

^{page xlvi note 7} No. 268.

^{page xlvi note 8} No. 272.

^{page xlvi note 9} Vol. i, p. 318

^{page xlvii note 1} No. 230.

^{page xlvii note 2} Nos. 199, 299–302.

^{page xlvii note 3} Nos. 163–5, 167, 222, 251.

^{page xlvii note 4} Stonor commonly wrote “v ” in place of “w ”; cf. No. 296.

^{page xlvii note 5} Cf. Nos. 98 and 99, 103–5, 107–10, and 298–301.