^{page 64 note 1} It was known as “Liber Rubeus Parliamentorum” to the Elizabethan antiquaries: cf. Hearne, , Curious Discourses (1771), II. 116.Google Scholar

^{page 64 note 2} Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, VI. 152.Google Scholar

^{page 64 note 3} Cole, , Documents illustrative of English History, p. 46.Google Scholar

^{page 65 note 1} Below, p. 74.

^{page 66 note 1} L.T.R. Mem. Roll 12 Edw. II (E. 368/89), m. 85.

^{page 66 note 2} Ancient Petition E. 1389.

^{page 66 note 3} Many of the entries on membrane 2 can be identified with petitions between E. 356 and E. 417 in the modern file B.C. 8/319, and the wrapper probably belongs to this series. None of these petitions bears a reply on the dorse.

^{page 68 note 1} Title from Additional MS. 41612.

^{page 68 note 2} Additional MS. inserts si.

^{page 68 note 3} E. 459 adds “et sil y eit point en les chattres oscures pur veilles paroles qeles seient esclarsies et mis en chartre par paroles vsueles et conoisables.” This clause has been cancelled.

^{page 68 note 4} E. 459 adds the words (subsequently cancelled) “et an et wast des terres et tenements meismes ceux”.

^{page 68 note 5} E. 459 adds the words (subsequently cancelled) “an et wast”.

^{page 68 note 6} E. 459 inserts ne.

^{page 68 note 7} E. 459 adds the words (subsequently cancelled) “ou fute facent duement”. The following reply to this paragraph has then been inserted and subsequently cancelled:—

“II semble as iustices, clerks et autres [substituted for sergeantz] qe le roi poet granter a leuesqe qe maintenant apres le felonie atteint et fine faite il puisse par ses baillifs les ditz chateux seisir, auer et tenir de la grace le roi parce qil les ad du droit de sa eglise par chartres des rois.

“II plest au roi etc.”

^{page 69 note 1} A.P. 9518 reads erroneously “hundred et demy”.

^{page 69 note 2} To this paragraph E. 459 inserts the following reply, subsequently cancelled:—

“Quant au couoroner [sic] il semble qil est bien a faire solunc ce qi est endosse de cel endroit.

“Il plest au roi.”

^{page 69 note 3} E. 459 adds “si li plest”.

^{page 69 note 4} This paragraph, which we print in italics, is found only in E. 459 and has been struck through to indicate that it is not to be enrolled.

^{page 69 note 5} This sentence originally began “Quant al article des chateux des futifs et des felons, vis est a eux”. These words have been deleted.

^{page 70 note 1} The following words have then been written and struck through: “Et ceste chose pleise au roi et as grantz.”

^{page 70 note 2} In E. 459 son has been substituted for leur.

^{page 70 note 3} In E. 459 omissíon has been substituted for a word in the plural, now illegible, and continues “ont este faites”. Additional MS. reads “omissioun ont este fait”.

^{page 70 note 4} A.P. 9518 sic.

^{page 70 note 5} E. 459 reads “qil les face seisir et eit et teigne”, without mention of the bishop's successors.

^{page 70 note 6} These entries are struck through.

^{page 71 note 1} These entries are struck through.

^{page 71 note 2} Sic MS.

^{page 72 note 1} Recte le Flechcher: see A.P. E. 380.

^{page 72 note 2} Substituted for Prioris.

^{page 72 note 3} Substituted for Radulfi.

^{page 72 note 4} Substituted for Iohannis.

^{page 73 note 1} Substituted for Dougall' Mac dowell'.

^{page 73 note 2} These entries are struck through.

^{page 73 note 3} Substituted for de.

^{page 73 note 4} Presumably Adain of Limber.

^{page 73 note 5} Written after deletion of preceding entry.

^{page 74 note 1} These entries are struck through.

^{page 74 note 2} Substituted for Croyland.

^{page 77 note 1} This entry is struck through.

^{page 77 note 2} It is not clear to whom this petition is assigned.

^{page 78 note 1} This and the following entries to the next cross-heading appear to be all assigned to Askeby, except where noted.

^{page 80 note 1} Sic MS.