^{page 136 note 1} The account is headed: Honor⋮ sancti⋮ Walerici⋮

^{page 136 note 2} The manor of Beckley, with the hamlet of Horton, including a park with deer, was held of the king in chief as of the honour of St. Valery, service unknown. Cat. ing. p.m., iii. 466Google Scholar. The earl also held the advowson of the church. Ibid., p. 479.

^{page 138 note 1} For views pertaining to the honour of St. Valery see Cal. inq. p.m., iii. 468.Google Scholar

^{page 139 note 1} ‘Idem R' Computat’ written in first and second entries with ‘R’ expunged in the first two and partly erased in the third.

^{page 140 note 1} ‘R’ is partly erased.

^{page 140 note 2} The manor was held of the king in chief as of the honour of St. Valery, by service of a knight's fee. Cal. inq. p.m., iii. 466.Google Scholar

^{page 140 note 3} The following entry is crossed through: ‘de 2s. de lohanne filio Henrici de Cruce pro warda 3½ acrarum terre solvendis per annum vsque ad plenam et legittimam etatem heredis predicti Henrici’. This is followed by an entry above the line: ‘quia heres habuit seysinam terre sue anno preterito et plene etatis’.

^{page 141 note 1} The following entry is crossed through: ‘Idem computat quod de 2d. prouenientibus de lohanne fabro pro quadam wasta placia in Harewelle nichil respondit senescallus eo quod dictus Johannes non inhabitat super dictam placiam nee aliqua districtio super ipsum fieri potest’. Over this, above the line is written ‘vacat’.

^{page 141 note 2} Compare these names with the holders in 1300 of ½ knight's fee in Harwell and Ealing (Berks.), namely: Walter Aleyn, Walter de Aula, John Moygne, Hugh Huchild, William de Aula, William Attegrave, William Catewy, Henry Wylard and Henry dse Mountfort. Cal. inq. p.m., iii. 479.Google Scholar

^{page 141 note 3} On the tongue of the membrane is written: Beckele: Harewelle.

^{page 142 note 1} For these rents see Cal. ing. p.m., iii. 467–8, 479.Google Scholar

^{page 142 note 2} I.e., in Upper and,Lower Horsepath (Oxon.), held by the master of the knights of the Temple in England. Ibid., p. 467.

^{page 142 note 3} This payment was for a sergeanty in Fulbrook. Ibid.

^{page 142 note 4} These heirs held ¼ knight's fee in Astrop, in Brize Norton parish, Oxon. Ibid.

^{page 142 note 5} I.e., for knight's fee here. Cal. inq. p.m., iii. 467.Google Scholar

^{page 142 note 6} I.e., for the manor. Ibid.

^{page 143 note 1} For fixed view, hidage and wardpenny in the honour of St. Valery, see Cal. ing. p.m., iii. 468.Google Scholar

^{page 148 note 1} In refounding the abbey of Rewley as a house of study for Cistercians at Oxford, Edmund, earl of Cornwall, gave all his lands and tenements with their appurtenances in Osney (including suit of court owed there), saving only sufficient space for holding his court of the honour of St. Valery. He also gave them 60s. which he used to receive annually from the abbot of Thame for 2 knights' fees in Stoke Talmage. His endowment included also the manor of Yarnton and mills in Cassington, and the hamlet of Woolaston in Mixbury parish (all these formerly part of the honour of St. Valery). Dugdale, Monasticon, v. 199Google Scholar. Cf. Cal. inq. p.m., iii. 482, 484, etc.Google Scholar

^{page 148 note 2} Ibid., pp. 482, 483.

^{page 149 note 1} The yearly rent was 100 marks, i.e. £66 13s. 4d. Ibid., 465; Cal. charter rolls, ii. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 149 note 2} Crease in parchment.

^{page 150 note 1} The last few words are rubbed and illegible.

^{page 150 note 2} On the tongue of the membrane is written: Northoseneye: Lechelade.