^{page 116 note 1} Written above, but not as an original heading, are two lines in a small hand:—“Pointes de parlement. Ici commence la suite de Hugh …” The first petition corresponds to the first entry on Chancery Parliament Roll No. 1: see above p. 102.

^{page 116 note 2} MS. le.

^{page 116 note 3} Sic MS.

^{page 116 note 4} This petition corresponds to the second entry on Chancery Parliament Roll, no. 1: see above, p. 102.

^{page 117 note 1} This petition corresponds to the fifth and sixth entries on Chancery Parliament Roll no. 1: see above, p. 102.

^{page 117 note 2} MS. qi.

^{page 117 note 3} MS. omits.

^{page 118 note 1} MS. quele.

^{page 118 note 2} Rot. Parl., II. 8a, first paragraph: 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 2.

^{page 118 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 8a, second paragraph.

^{page 118 note 4} The next six words are vacated in Chancery Parliament Roll, no. 1, and are omitted in the Rotuli Parliamentorum.

^{page 118 note 5} Sic MS.

^{page 118 note 6} Rot. Parl., II. 8a (6).

^{page 119 note 1} Rot. Part., II 8a (7): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 3.

^{page 119 note 2} MS. issues.

^{page 119 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 9a (17).

^{page 119 note 4} Sic MS: Chanc. Parl. Roll, no. 1, dens.

^{page 119 note 5} A word such as granté is wanting.

^{page 119 note 6} Chanc. Parl. Roll, no. 1, inserts prelate, conies et grands.

^{page 119 note 7} Rot. Parl., II. 8a (8): 1 Edw. III. St. 2, cap. 4.

^{page 119 note 8} MS. tresores.

^{page 119 note 9} MS. omits.

^{page 120 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 8a (9): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 5.

^{page 120 note 2} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (10): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 6, 7.

^{page 120 note 3} Recte xv.

^{page 120 note 4} Recte xx.

^{page 120 note 5} Rot. Parl., II, 8b (12): 1 Edw. III., St. 2, cap. 8.

^{page 120 note 6} MS. biens.

^{page 121 note 1} Chanc. Parl. Roll, no. 1, reads: “pleider a torns des viscuntes ne a letes”.

^{page 121 note 2} From this point the text of the paragraph is corrupt, due to a misreading of an abbreviation for viscuntes as vse and a subsequent attempt to make sense.

^{page 121 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 10b (33).

^{page 121 note 4} Repeated in MS.

^{page 121 note 5} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (13).

^{page 121 note 6} Ibid., 7a (1: lines 28–30): see above, p. 102.

^{page 121 note 7} Ibid., 7a (3: lines 6–20): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 1.

^{page 122 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (11): of. 1 Edw. III, St. 1, cap. 4.

^{page 122 note 2} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (14): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 9.

^{page 122 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (15).

^{page 122 note 4} Ibid., 8b (16).

^{page 122 note 5} 24 September, 1326.

^{page 122 note 6} Rot. Parl., 9a (19).

^{page 122 note 7} MS. omits.

^{page 123 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 9a (20).

^{page 123 note 2} MS. atrement.

^{page 123 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (21): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 11.

^{page 123 note 4} Sic MS.: rectius suent.

^{page 123 note 5} Rot. Parl., II. 10a (32): 1 Edw. III, St. 1, cap 5.

^{page 123 note 6} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (23).

^{page 123 note 7} Sic MS.: rectius prioms.

^{page 123 note 8} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (24).

^{page 123 note 9} MS., omits.