Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T12:20:33.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE CLASSIFICATION AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THORONINI (HYMENOPTERA: PROCTOTRUPOIDEA, SCELIONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

The tribe Thoronini Kozlov, 1970 as interpreted here in its broader sense includes also the tribes Pseudanteridini and Tiphodytini as proposed by Kozlov (1970), i.e. the following genera: Thoron Haliday, 1833, Neothoron n. gen., Pseudanteris Fouts, 1927, Thoronella n. gen., Microthoron n. gen., Tanaodytes n. gen., and Tiphodytes Bradley, 1902. The new taxa described are: Neothoron lautus n. gen. and n. sp., Ecuador; Thoronella elegans n. gen. and n. sp., Brazil; Microthoron baeoides n. gen. and n. sp., Malaya; Tanaodytes longipes n. gen. and n. sp., Malaya; Tanaodytes soror n. sp., Ceylon; Tiphodytes godavari n. sp., Nepal; Tiphodytes mymar n. sp., Malaya; Tiphodytes selangor n. sp., Malaya.The genera Thoron, Pseudanteris, and Tiphodytes are recorded for the first time in Canada. The name Calliscelio Ashmead, 1893 is considered a synonym of Calotelea Westwood, 1837 (new synonymy).The species of Thoronini, the biology of which is known, parasitize eggs of water Heteroptera (Gerridae, Nepidae) and it is assumed that most if not all species of this tribe either live in, or are closely associated with, aquatic or semi-aquatic habitats. This is inferred, in the case of species for which definite information is lacking, from the sites in which the adults have been collected, all of which were near water.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. 1893. A monograph of the North American Proctotrypidae. Bull. U.S. nat. Mus., No. 45, 472 p.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. 1903. Classification of the pointed-tailed wasps, or the superfamily Proctotrupoidea. III. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 11: 8699.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. C. 1902. A recently discovered genus and species of aquatic Hymenoptera. Can. Ent. 34: 179180.Google Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1913. Himenópteros de la América Meridional. An. Mus. Hist. Nat. B. Aires 24: 35166.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous insects. VI + 688 p. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill, New York and London.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1830. British entomology. Vol. 3, p. 329. London.Google Scholar
Debauche, R. H. 1947. Scelionidae de la faune belge. Bull. Annls Soc. r. ent. Belg. 83: 255285.Google Scholar
Ferrière, Ch. 1916. Description d'un Hymenoptère nouveau (Anteris nepae) parasite des oeufs de la Nepe. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 55: 7580.Google Scholar
Ganin, M. 1869. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Entwicklungsgeschichte bei den Insekten. Z. wiss. Zool. 19: 381451, pls. 30–33.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1956. Chap. 12, Aquatic Hymenoptera, p. 289292. In Usinger, R. L., Aquatic insects of California. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hellén, W. 1971. Die Scelioninen Finnlands (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Fauna fenn. 23: 125.Google Scholar
Henriksen, K. L. 1918. De europaeiske Vandsnyltehvepse og deres Biologi. (The aquatic Hymenoptera of Europe and their biology.) Ent. Meddr 12: 137251.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, C. H. 1932. Hymenopterous parasites from eggs of aquatic and semi-aquatic insects. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 5(2): 3337.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1909. Description de quelques nouveaux Scelionides d'Europe (Hym.). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 1909: 268271.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1926. Scelionidae. Das Tierreich 48: 885 p. Gruyter, Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar